RC: -2
LR: -3

LG: -2

LR: -1
174.
You and I are having the same exact problem! I KEEP getting 169s and I feel all of them just taunting meAmerision wrote:Mannnnn, I am so frustrated. Took PT 73 today and got a 169. That's three in a row. All three times, I've been really tired, but that's not an excuse. I'm getting so many more wrong in reading comp than I should be and a freaking -4 in LG. This is driving me insane. Just let me stay in the 170s!!
Review your basics, and put a lot of effort into understanding why you got things both. Try to remember what you were thinking during a question and your reasoning and see where things don't match up. Once you break through this plateau you'll probably see a big increase!!principalagent wrote:You and I are having the same exact problem! I KEEP getting 169s and I feel all of them just taunting meAmerision wrote:Mannnnn, I am so frustrated. Took PT 73 today and got a 169. That's three in a row. All three times, I've been really tired, but that's not an excuse. I'm getting so many more wrong in reading comp than I should be and a freaking -4 in LG. This is driving me insane. Just let me stay in the 170s!!
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
169 forever crew represent!principalagent wrote:You and I are having the same exact problem! I KEEP getting 169s and I feel all of them just taunting meAmerision wrote:Mannnnn, I am so frustrated. Took PT 73 today and got a 169. That's three in a row. All three times, I've been really tired, but that's not an excuse. I'm getting so many more wrong in reading comp than I should be and a freaking -4 in LG. This is driving me insane. Just let me stay in the 170s!!
so good at LG he doesn't even have to list itMint-Berry_Crunch wrote:Went back over the test and I think I got a 170.
So maybe it wasn't easier on a tablet I was just not paying attention haha.
-4 RC
-3 LR1
-4 LR2
I made a lot of dumb mistakes, but there are def some LR I didn't understand. Kind of a good reminder, bc imo I think the LR and RC on tests 70+ are really different than previous tests
dm1683 wrote:so good at LG he doesn't even have to list itMint-Berry_Crunch wrote:Went back over the test and I think I got a 170.
So maybe it wasn't easier on a tablet I was just not paying attention haha.
-4 RC
-3 LR1
-4 LR2
I made a lot of dumb mistakes, but there are def some LR I didn't understand. Kind of a good reminder, bc imo I think the LR and RC on tests 70+ are really different than previous tests
I hate you
Drill games. Drill games. Drill games.HenryHankPalmer wrote:I'm hitting a wall in the high 160s and it is very frustrating. My last five diagnostics have been 167, 166, 169, 167, 169. I'm getting nearly perfect on LR, but LG is still the bane of my existence. I don't find the sections difficult, I usually get through 3 of the 4 sections perfectly, but run out of time on the last one and leave 4-5 points on the table. Similar situation in reading comp, which is even more frustrating because it was my strongest section to begin with, and now I'm getting -5/-6 on every RC section. I think at this point it is gonna come down to cleaning up little things, but does anyone have any advice for how to get more efficient?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
same boat as you.heyduchess wrote:I'm so frustrated by RC.
I keep either killing it or being killed. I've drilled. I've reviewed. I've tried everything. And I can't figure out the difference between the times when I do well and when I don't.
BSHALKFDJA;SDLFKJAS;DLKFJ
Ugh, yeah I got the PT 19-28 book solely for some extra RC practice. Took PT 19's RC this morning..... I got destroyed. Not helping the confidence since my previous 3 RC sections were -1, -4, -3, after not breaking -7 on the previous 10 RC sections. Hoping it was just an off day. I thought I had figured something out. Some days I have to read so much slower than others in order to comprehend everything :/heyduchess wrote:I'm so frustrated by RC.
I keep either killing it or being killed. I've drilled. I've reviewed. I've tried everything. And I can't figure out the difference between the times when I do well and when I don't.
BSHALKFDJA;SDLFKJAS;DLKFJ
Exactly this. I'm -6 LR, -0 LG, and then total wildcard on RC. So it's the difference between a 174 and a 168 for me at this point.saf18hornet wrote:Ugh, yeah I got the PT 19-28 book solely for some extra RC practice. Took PT 19's RC this morning..... I got destroyed. Not helping the confidence since my previous 3 RC sections were -1, -4, -3, after not breaking -7 on the previous 10 RC sections. Hoping it was just an off day. I thought I had figured something out. Some days I have to read so much slower than others in order to comprehend everything :/heyduchess wrote:I'm so frustrated by RC.
I keep either killing it or being killed. I've drilled. I've reviewed. I've tried everything. And I can't figure out the difference between the times when I do well and when I don't.
BSHALKFDJA;SDLFKJAS;DLKFJ
If I can get -4 or better on test day RC, I'm guaranteed 170+.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I'm planning to sacrifice a goat on Friday if you want inlynn.wibi wrote:How do you guys push from the 174-176 zone to 177+?
Is this a consistency of application of method issue or not understanding the questions?heyduchess wrote:Exactly this. I'm -6 LR, -0 LG, and then total wildcard on RC. So it's the difference between a 174 and a 168 for me at this point.saf18hornet wrote:Ugh, yeah I got the PT 19-28 book solely for some extra RC practice. Took PT 19's RC this morning..... I got destroyed. Not helping the confidence since my previous 3 RC sections were -1, -4, -3, after not breaking -7 on the previous 10 RC sections. Hoping it was just an off day. I thought I had figured something out. Some days I have to read so much slower than others in order to comprehend everything :/heyduchess wrote:I'm so frustrated by RC.
I keep either killing it or being killed. I've drilled. I've reviewed. I've tried everything. And I can't figure out the difference between the times when I do well and when I don't.
BSHALKFDJA;SDLFKJAS;DLKFJ
If I can get -4 or better on test day RC, I'm guaranteed 170+.
Sweet, I'll PM you later. I like getting to centers early also just to not feel rushedNik9639 wrote:90% chance I'll drive, so just PM me closer to the day to double check and I'll send you my cell number. I'm planning to get there a little earlier on the d day to get a lay of the land.Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:Appreciated but no pressure to bring it! Driving can be annoying.Nik9639 wrote:IF I decide to drive you are welcome to lock your stuff in my car.Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:blahNik9639 wrote:blahMint-Berry_Crunch wrote:Nik9639 wrote: suh dude
Suh same tc
This is TCR.Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:I'm planning to sacrifice a goat on Friday if you want inlynn.wibi wrote:How do you guys push from the 174-176 zone to 177+?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I'm a vegan and goats are my favorite... But for a 178?archer grandpapy360 wrote:What's the buy in? If I bring my own goat am I covered?Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:I'm planning to sacrifice a goat on Friday if you want inlynn.wibi wrote:How do you guys push from the 174-176 zone to 177+?
heyduchess wrote:I'm a vegan and goats are my favorite... But for a 178?archer grandpapy360 wrote:What's the buy in? If I bring my own goat am I covered?Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:I'm planning to sacrifice a goat on Friday if you want inlynn.wibi wrote:How do you guys push from the 174-176 zone to 177+?
Where we meeting, fam?
Platopus wrote:There are some good indications, for example "S is either in slot 1 or else in slot 7" - split that bitch.Jack_Kelly wrote:Thanks, I'll try that. I've discovered my main issue is not knowing when to split a board (and when I specifically look for how to split it, I somehow manage to split it wrong a lot).Platopus wrote:Radically reconsider your approach. If you usually do the "multiple scenario" set up like 7 sage, try a parsed down set up, or vice versa. Also, maybe consider spending more time in the actual set up when you are taking the test. I started going from like -4 / -5 to -0/-1 once I spent considerably more time working with the rules on each game. Not always, but sometimes a game will have a key inference, that if figured out blows the whole game wide-open. It feels like cheating, but you are meant to be rewarded for figuring it out. If you don't know what I'm talking about, I would take that as a sign that you should spend more time up front with the rules figuring out how they affect one another. Other tricks: look for logically equivalent answers, use other questions to knock out global MBT, CBT, MBF, etc.Jack_Kelly wrote:Anyone have any advice for rapid LG improvement beyond 7sage and PowerScore?
I'm doing better than most people on here in the 170s on the other sections but just tragic in the games, regularly double digits missed.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login