I heard from the kinds of people who have a history of knowing these things that the 24th isn't going to be a thing.TheMikey wrote:Wasn't there a prediction somewhere that we COULD get our scores even on the 24th?
June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum
-
ponderingmeerkat

- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
- Dodocogon

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:45 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Yeah, I'm not one to skimp on instructions, as I assume you aren't either. I was talking to people about it today and I heard many a joke about a lawyer not reading/signing right! Who knows, these things happen. Regardless, I think it'll end up alright for us.hip to be Square wrote:My first post as a non-lurker... of course it took something extreme for me to speak up. I too received a similar message today, and I'm so confused by it. I can say with near certainty that I copied the statement verbatim and signed it on test day. I assumed maybe I had missed a filler word or punctuation or something, but when I asked via email today they said "the test center has reported that you provided neither a certifying statement nor a signature". !!!!!!!!! Freaking out because I know that I did. I re-wrote and emailed it right away of course, but I'm just so confused..Dodocogon wrote:Thinking back, I think I just forgot to sign it. I remember making sure sure everything was right with the statement!Dodocogon wrote:Just got an email from LSAC saying a hold was placed on my account; apparently I didn't fill out the certifying statement verbatim, so I just have to copy it down again and send it in via post... Severe moment of panic when I got the email though! Doesn't sound like I should have any delay since I'm sending it out today.
-
ponderingmeerkat

- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
A good way for the LSAC to generate some additional cash flow from people taking Sept en masse.forum_user wrote:That one person who votes for a -7 curve and just wants to watch the world burn......................HennessyVSOP wrote:New poll. Good god i love me some new poll.
- meeseeks

- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:06 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Welcome back sir Meerkat. It's been a hot secondponderingmeerkat wrote:I heard from the kinds of people who have a history of knowing these things that the 24th isn't going to be a thing.TheMikey wrote:Wasn't there a prediction somewhere that we COULD get our scores even on the 24th?
- Thelaw23

- Posts: 794
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:23 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Guys, I got a question.
So percentile/and LSAT score. Like, 170 is always near a certain percentile, right?
It can't be that you got a 170 but percentile wise it's crap?
So percentile/and LSAT score. Like, 170 is always near a certain percentile, right?
It can't be that you got a 170 but percentile wise it's crap?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
ponderingmeerkat

- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Yea brother. Damn shame too...looks like our pagecount could've used some shitpoasting around here.Mr. Meeseeks wrote:Welcome back sir Meerkat. It's been a hot secondponderingmeerkat wrote:I heard from the kinds of people who have a history of knowing these things that the 24th isn't going to be a thing.TheMikey wrote:Wasn't there a prediction somewhere that we COULD get our scores even on the 24th?
How's everyone doing? No full-blown neurotic breakdowns or anything right???
-
ponderingmeerkat

- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
It's always close to the same percentile but it's not going to be exact.Thelaw23 wrote:Guys, I got a question.
So percentile/and LSAT score. Like, 170 is always near a certain percentile, right?
It can't be that you got a 170 but percentile wise it's crap?
LSAC's been doing this for a while and they've got their curve down so usually a 170 will be nearly the same as the next 170 from a different administration.
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
It's theoretically possible for a 170 to end up being a crappy percentile but you're literally more likely to get struck by lightning so I wouldn't worry about it.Thelaw23 wrote:Guys, I got a question.
So percentile/and LSAT score. Like, 170 is always near a certain percentile, right?
It can't be that you got a 170 but percentile wise it's crap?
- Bearlyalive

- Posts: 933
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 3:35 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Nonono, that's the 180 curveforum_user wrote:That one person who votes for a -7 curve and just wants to watch the world burn......................HennessyVSOP wrote:New poll. Good god i love me some new poll.
-
Hennessy

- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
this is a boring question
i am sorry
i will try harder
work is tearing me to pieces
i am sorry
i will try harder
work is tearing me to pieces
- UltimateSplitter

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:44 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
You almost tricked me into convincing myself of a sweet sweet curve.ponderingmeerkat wrote:A good way for the LSAC to generate some additional cash flow from people taking Sept en masse.forum_user wrote:That one person who votes for a -7 curve and just wants to watch the world burn......................HennessyVSOP wrote:New poll. Good god i love me some new poll.
- Dodocogon

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:45 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Eh, it at least kind of confirmed what we knew... That RC was what we perceived as the toughest section. I went for LG because I still felt strong on the other fronts thoHennessyVSOP wrote:this is a boring question
i am sorry
i will try harder
work is tearing me to pieces
- UltimateSplitter

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:44 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
What'd you think of LR? I had an LR as my first section and that is pretty much a blank in memory from the first-section jitters (I remember the 2nd being average to on the easier side).Dodocogon wrote:Eh, it at least kind of confirmed what we knew... That RC was what we perceived as the toughest section. I went for LG because I still felt strong on the other fronts thoHennessyVSOP wrote:this is a boring question
i am sorry
i will try harder
work is tearing me to pieces
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- UltimateSplitter

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:44 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
P.S. we hit the 6 page daily goal already. Once we get to page 180 I'm chugging a Four loko for added good luck.
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
All good here brother. Dwindling post count but pretty much the same. How's your week been?ponderingmeerkat wrote:Yea brother. Damn shame too...looks like our pagecount could've used some shitpoasting around here.Mr. Meeseeks wrote:Welcome back sir Meerkat. It's been a hot secondponderingmeerkat wrote:I heard from the kinds of people who have a history of knowing these things that the 24th isn't going to be a thing.TheMikey wrote:Wasn't there a prediction somewhere that we COULD get our scores even on the 24th?
How's everyone doing? No full-blown neurotic breakdowns or anything right???
- Dodocogon

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:45 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Specifics of LR are lost on me, I went LR-LG-LR-LR-RC, so I had a lot to wade through. For overall LR though, I had ample time to finish and even went reviewed/change two answers total (I hope I made the right decision on those...), which is usually a sign for me of a good section. I did have to go back to the political party/mayor problem and diagram it like a game for it to make sense to me, but that was the only one that really stumped me. I had the cocoa/island experimental if that helps.UltimateSplitter wrote:What'd you think of LR? I had an LR as my first section and that is pretty much a blank in memory from the first-section jitters (I remember the 2nd being average to on the easier side).Dodocogon wrote:Eh, it at least kind of confirmed what we knew... That RC was what we perceived as the toughest section. I went for LG because I still felt strong on the other fronts thoHennessyVSOP wrote:this is a boring question
i am sorry
i will try harder
work is tearing me to pieces
- meeseeks

- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:06 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
You are my spirit brother. 100% guaranteeUltimateSplitter wrote:P.S. we hit the 6 page daily goal already. Once we get to page 180 I'm chugging a Four loko for added good luck.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- UltimateSplitter

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:44 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
That's exactly how mine went. I ended up with a few minutes left on the real ones and changed one and I had probably 5 left on the experimental.Dodocogon wrote:Specifics of LR are lost on me, I went LR-LG-LR-LR-RC, so I had a lot to wade through. For overall LR though, I had ample time to finish and even went reviewed/change two answers total (I hope I made the right decision on those...), which is usually a sign for me of a good section. I did have to go back to the political party/mayor problem and diagram it like a game for it to make sense to me, but that was the only one that really stumped me. I had the cocoa/island experimental if that helps.UltimateSplitter wrote:What'd you think of LR? I had an LR as my first section and that is pretty much a blank in memory from the first-section jitters (I remember the 2nd being average to on the easier side).Dodocogon wrote:Eh, it at least kind of confirmed what we knew... That RC was what we perceived as the toughest section. I went for LG because I still felt strong on the other fronts thoHennessyVSOP wrote:this is a boring question
i am sorry
i will try harder
work is tearing me to pieces
- UltimateSplitter

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:44 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Haha. I actually just remembered that the state that I'm in for the summer outlawed those things.. I'll go with some stiff Coronaritas.Mr. Meeseeks wrote:You are my spirit brother. 100% guaranteeUltimateSplitter wrote:P.S. we hit the 6 page daily goal already. Once we get to page 180 I'm chugging a Four loko for added good luck.
-
ponderingmeerkat

- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
A little sporty man. Privert's interim mandate is up. He doesn't want to leave and his party supporters (same party as Aristide had back in 2004) are willing to take to the streets to make sure he stays despite not having any constitutionally approved mandate. So, basically, Haiti standard. But made for a busy week.R. Jeeves wrote:All good here brother. Dwindling post count but pretty much the same. How's your week been?ponderingmeerkat wrote:Yea brother. Damn shame too...looks like our pagecount could've used some shitpoasting around here.Mr. Meeseeks wrote:Welcome back sir Meerkat. It's been a hot secondponderingmeerkat wrote:I heard from the kinds of people who have a history of knowing these things that the 24th isn't going to be a thing.TheMikey wrote:Wasn't there a prediction somewhere that we COULD get our scores even on the 24th?
How's everyone doing? No full-blown neurotic breakdowns or anything right???
Last edited by ponderingmeerkat on Mon Jun 20, 2016 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
ponderingmeerkat

- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Is Four Loko still I thing?? I thought those were outlawed by the pearl clutches like, 5 years ago.UltimateSplitter wrote:P.S. we hit the 6 page daily goal already. Once we get to page 180 I'm chugging a Four loko for added good luck.
(Outted as old??)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- UltimateSplitter

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:44 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I know you can still buy them around Chicago. But that's the only place that I know for sure.ponderingmeerkat wrote:Is Four Loko still I thing?? I thought those were outlawed by the pearl clutches like, 5 years ago.UltimateSplitter wrote:P.S. we hit the 6 page daily goal already. Once we get to page 180 I'm chugging a Four loko for added good luck.
(Outted as old??)
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
If you're looking for an excuse for neglecting your shitpoasting duties you're going to have to do a little better than this. It's not even a civil war.ponderingmeerkat wrote:A little sporty man. Privert's interim mandate is up. He doesn't want to leave and his party supporters (same party as Aristide had back in 2004) are willing to take to the streets to make sure he stays despite not having any constitutionally approved mandate. So, basically, Haiti standard. But made for a busy week.R. Jeeves wrote:All good here brother. Dwindling post count but pretty much the same. How's your week been?ponderingmeerkat wrote:Yea brother. Damn shame too...looks like our pagecount could've used some shitpoasting around here.Mr. Meeseeks wrote:Welcome back sir Meerkat. It's been a hot secondponderingmeerkat wrote:I heard from the kinds of people who have a history of knowing these things that the 24th isn't going to be a thing.TheMikey wrote:Wasn't there a prediction somewhere that we COULD get our scores even on the 24th?
How's everyone doing? No full-blown neurotic breakdowns or anything right???
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Damn, I haven't had one of those in so long... I know some of the bodegas around me still sell themUltimateSplitter wrote:I know you can still buy them around Chicago. But that's the only place that I know for sure.ponderingmeerkat wrote:Is Four Loko still I thing?? I thought those were outlawed by the pearl clutches like, 5 years ago.UltimateSplitter wrote:P.S. we hit the 6 page daily goal already. Once we get to page 180 I'm chugging a Four loko for added good luck.
(Outted as old??)
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
The old formula was banned (with caffeine) so they changed it and back on market, it was pretty much never off the shelves completelyUltimateSplitter wrote:I know you can still buy them around Chicago. But that's the only place that I know for sure.ponderingmeerkat wrote:Is Four Loko still I thing?? I thought those were outlawed by the pearl clutches like, 5 years ago.UltimateSplitter wrote:P.S. we hit the 6 page daily goal already. Once we get to page 180 I'm chugging a Four loko for added good luck.
(Outted as old??)
Don't ask why I know all this
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login