June 2011 Study Group Forum
- pkrtbx
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:11 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
PT 46 today
RC -1
RCe -0
LR1 -3
LR2 -1
LG -0
Scaled: 176
Either I am finally getting better at LG, or LG has been WAY easier on PTs 44-46. I am hoping for the former but not holding my breath. I just need to eek out a couple of those extra points...
RC -1
RCe -0
LR1 -3
LR2 -1
LG -0
Scaled: 176
Either I am finally getting better at LG, or LG has been WAY easier on PTs 44-46. I am hoping for the former but not holding my breath. I just need to eek out a couple of those extra points...
- mickeyD
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:43 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
SuperPrep LG Drilling:
A: (30:58), 0
B: (33:46), 0
C: (32:12), -1
Whew. Those were just as challenging as I remember them. Haven't seen these since I took them as PTs at the beginning of April and went -4, -3, -3 respectively. I think SPB is one of the hardest LG sections ever.
Only gave myself one run-through and then hit stop on the timer. I don't like to bank on the idea that I'll be able to check my answers, especially since catching errors in LG involves a lot of luck.
A: (30:58), 0
B: (33:46), 0
C: (32:12), -1
Whew. Those were just as challenging as I remember them. Haven't seen these since I took them as PTs at the beginning of April and went -4, -3, -3 respectively. I think SPB is one of the hardest LG sections ever.
Only gave myself one run-through and then hit stop on the timer. I don't like to bank on the idea that I'll be able to check my answers, especially since catching errors in LG involves a lot of luck.
- mandolin
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:37 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
I took PT 54 today and ended up with some unusual results.
--I finished all 4 Logic Games with time to spare (usually I can only do 2 1/2 games)
--Had -3 on LG (Usually have -12 or -13)
--Struggled through all logical reasoning sections (Usually my best section)
--Had -10 and -11 on LR (Usually have -4 or -5)
Was it just me or did PT 54 have a super easy LG section, and a super hard LR section? After I finished all Logic Games with time to spare, I thought that I was in the mid-160's for sure, but ended up with only a 156 because I sucked hard on LR.
RC -7
LR-10
LG-3
LR-11
Scaled Score 156
--I finished all 4 Logic Games with time to spare (usually I can only do 2 1/2 games)
--Had -3 on LG (Usually have -12 or -13)
--Struggled through all logical reasoning sections (Usually my best section)
--Had -10 and -11 on LR (Usually have -4 or -5)
Was it just me or did PT 54 have a super easy LG section, and a super hard LR section? After I finished all Logic Games with time to spare, I thought that I was in the mid-160's for sure, but ended up with only a 156 because I sucked hard on LR.
RC -7
LR-10
LG-3
LR-11
Scaled Score 156
- gaud
- Posts: 5765
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:58 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
PT 57 Today
LG - -0
LR1 - -4
LR2 - -3
RC - -5
Raw 89, Scaled 169
Lame focus throughout the entire test (B & N was a madhouse today for some reason) , although I know that it a poor excuse.
LG - -0
LR1 - -4
LR2 - -3
RC - -5
Raw 89, Scaled 169
Lame focus throughout the entire test (B & N was a madhouse today for some reason) , although I know that it a poor excuse.
Last edited by gaud on Thu May 26, 2011 12:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Strange
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:23 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
Hate to be the one to tell ya, but LG's in the mid-40's are a total cakewalk. Start working on the late-50's to get better practicepkrtbx wrote:PT 46 today
RC -1
RCe -0
LR1 -3
LR2 -1
LG -0
Scaled: 176
Either I am finally getting better at LG, or LG has been WAY easier on PTs 44-46. I am hoping for the former but not holding my breath. I just need to eek out a couple of those extra points...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- OhOkay
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:14 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
Hey guys. I'm trying to prioritize all the remaining unused preptests I have, given that there's only eleven days left. I have 7 recent (post-PT50) full-length PTs to do on seven different days, but which of the following PTs should I try to make sure I expose myself to via experimental sections or drilling (or maybe even one or two more full-length PTs): PTs 25-31, 36-39, 46-49.
- northwood
- Posts: 5036
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
do the recent pts for exp and for the real deal holyfield ( practice tests that is)
- OhOkay
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:14 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
So you mean 46-49? Or that i should repeat post-PT50 sections for my experimentals?northwood wrote:do the recent pts for exp and for the real deal holyfield ( practice tests that is)
- UnamSanctam
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
Worse performance than I'd like on PT 54. Misbubbled one LG answer. Missed 3 in a row on RC and a couple of LR questions due to zoning out. I don't know what happening to my endurance, but I may need some tips. How do you guys keep focus?
- northwood
- Posts: 5036
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
OhOkay wrote:So you mean 46-49? Or that i should repeat post-PT50 sections for my experimentals?northwood wrote:do the recent pts for exp and for the real deal holyfield ( practice tests that is)
yes. make sure you get enough of the comparative RC section if you need the extra work for it, so use 46-49 as exp.
- OhOkay
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:14 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
I don't know if this is the case for you, but if you've been studying in the same place so far, it might help to change up the location. I tried PT-ing in different local libraries and it's made a huge difference in my energy and my focus, as compared to studying at home everyday (so close to my fridge and my bed...).UnamSanctam wrote:Worse performance than I'd like on PT 54. Misbubbled one LG answer. Missed 3 in a row on RC and a couple of LR questions due to zoning out. I don't know what happening to my endurance, but I may need some tips. How do you guys keep focus?
- UnamSanctam
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
Will try that, thanks!OhOkay wrote:I don't know if this is the case for you, but if you've been studying in the same place so far, it might help to change up the location. I tried PT-ing in different local libraries and it's made a huge difference in my energy and my focus, as compared to studying at home everyday (so close to my fridge and my bed...).UnamSanctam wrote:Worse performance than I'd like on PT 54. Misbubbled one LG answer. Missed 3 in a row on RC and a couple of LR questions due to zoning out. I don't know what happening to my endurance, but I may need some tips. How do you guys keep focus?
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
PT 57 today!
LG -0
LR -2
LR -1
RC -1
97/177
This is my first -1 RC in freaking AGESSSSSSSSSSSSSS. I just finished the Manhattan RC guide so it was a relief to actually see some change. Is 57's RC a little easier than usual? I was expecting a slight jump but not quite so much! (I usually get around -4/-5 on RC).
LG -0
LR -2
LR -1
RC -1
97/177

This is my first -1 RC in freaking AGESSSSSSSSSSSSSS. I just finished the Manhattan RC guide so it was a relief to actually see some change. Is 57's RC a little easier than usual? I was expecting a slight jump but not quite so much! (I usually get around -4/-5 on RC).
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- iphone7
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 8:46 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
Whenever I start to feel myself losing focus, I just mentally slap myself in the face and remind myself that this is the most important test I will ever take and I had better give it the appropriate amount of focus. I don't know if that'll work to make me focus or just psych me out on test day, but it motivates me on practice tests.UnamSanctam wrote:Worse performance than I'd like on PT 54. Misbubbled one LG answer. Missed 3 in a row on RC and a couple of LR questions due to zoning out. I don't know what happening to my endurance, but I may need some tips. How do you guys keep focus?
- coldshoulder
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 4:05 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
Holy shit nice crumpets! Even though you thought I was a woman I'm stoked on your scorecrumpetsandtea wrote:PT 57 today!
LG -0
LR -2
LR -1
RC -1
97/177![]()
This is my first -1 RC in freaking AGESSSSSSSSSSSSSS. I just finished the Manhattan RC guide so it was a relief to actually see some change. Is 57's RC a little easier than usual? I was expecting a slight jump but not quite so much! (I usually get around -4/-5 on RC).

- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
coldshoulder wrote:Holy shit nice crumpets! Even though you thought I was a woman I'm stoked on your scorecrumpetsandtea wrote:PT 57 today! This is my first -1 RC in freaking AGESSSSSSSSSSSSSS. I just finished the Manhattan RC guide so it was a relief to actually see some change. Is 57's RC a little easier than usual? I was expecting a slight jump but not quite so much! (I usually get around -4/-5 on RC).


-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
Cold, I thought you were a girl too.
coldshoulder wrote:Holy shit nice crumpets! Even though you thought I was a woman I'm stoked on your scorecrumpetsandtea wrote:PT 57 today!
This is my first -1 RC in freaking AGESSSSSSSSSSSSSS. I just finished the Manhattan RC guide so it was a relief to actually see some change. Is 57's RC a little easier than usual? I was expecting a slight jump but not quite so much! (I usually get around -4/-5 on RC).
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Eichörnchen
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:51 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
Nice work crumpets...and did I miss a random streak of self-tarring or something?crumpetsandtea wrote:coldshoulder wrote:Holy shit nice crumpets! Even though you thought I was a woman I'm stoked on your scorecrumpetsandtea wrote:PT 57 today! This is my first -1 RC in freaking AGESSSSSSSSSSSSSS. I just finished the Manhattan RC guide so it was a relief to actually see some change. Is 57's RC a little easier than usual? I was expecting a slight jump but not quite so much! (I usually get around -4/-5 on RC).![]()
<3 FWIW, I told someone else from these boards that I thought you were a girl before you posted the pics and they were like "what? how?? he practically screams 'dude'" So...basically I'm just le dumb XD

- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
Thanks!! (: And nope, just....the lounge being the lounge (read: a crazy, pic-whoring, hilarious circle-jerk of a timesuckEichörnchen wrote:Nice work crumpets...and did I miss a random streak of self-tarring or something?crumpetsandtea wrote:coldshoulder wrote:Holy shit nice crumpets! Even though you thought I was a woman I'm stoked on your scorecrumpetsandtea wrote:PT 57 today! This is my first -1 RC in freaking AGESSSSSSSSSSSSSS. I just finished the Manhattan RC guide so it was a relief to actually see some change. Is 57's RC a little easier than usual? I was expecting a slight jump but not quite so much! (I usually get around -4/-5 on RC).![]()
<3 FWIW, I told someone else from these boards that I thought you were a girl before you posted the pics and they were like "what? how?? he practically screams 'dude'" So...basically I'm just le dumb XD
- Eichörnchen
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:51 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
Haha figures. I've done my best to avoid it so far. Both out of fear and knowledge that I don't need another timesuck
(although I was totally glued to it April Fools' day because the mass chaos was amazing.)

- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
HAHAHHAHA April Fool's was fucking amazing. I <3 waterman. And yeah, I got sucked into a megathread after like my FIRST post in the lounge. I went from <100 posts to my current post count (Eichörnchen wrote:Haha figures. I've done my best to avoid it so far. Both out of fear and knowledge that I don't need another timesuck(although I was totally glued to it April Fools' day because the mass chaos was amazing.)



Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Group
On my break between halves of PT58. Took the 1st 2 secs and an exp sec. The RC sec totally owned me. Did others find it hard in PT58? I'm still sick from yesterday, so I guess my 10 min break has turned into a day break. I came home from the library to sleep. I'll do the other half of PT58 tomorrow. The 1st LR also was NOT easy or maybe my sick mind was not focused enough.
How much did you guys get on PT58?
How much did you guys get on PT58?
- Ginj
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:53 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
PT58 is the one that owned me on LR2. And by "owned," I mean, "made me its bitch."jim-green wrote:On my break between halves of PT58. Took the 1st 2 secs and an exp sec. The RC sec totally owned me. Did others find it hard in PT58? I'm still sick from yesterday, so I guess my 10 min break has turned into a day break. I came home from the library to sleep. I'll do the other half of PT58 tomorrow. The 1st LR also was NOT easy or maybe my sick mind was not focused enough.
How much did you guys get on PT58?
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:22 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
Hey guys, does anyone have thoughts on the difficulty of PT 51? I got my best score so far on it, but my euphoria is semi-tempered because I thought the test as a whole was pretty easy. The curve seems kind of generous though so I don't know.
- pkrtbx
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:11 am
Re: June 2011 Study Group
I figured as much, so I did games from 54 and 55, which I had already taken (and bombed LG) as full PTs. I was able to work through them a lot more accurately and under time, so I am hoping that the new strategy is making somewhat of a difference even if the games in my current PTs are obviously easier. What really gets me these days is a game with an unusual setup that I can't figure out how to diagram effectively, or strange rules that I can't easily symbolize.Strange wrote: Hate to be the one to tell ya, but LG's in the mid-40's are a total cakewalk. Start working on the late-50's to get better practice
PT 47 today
LR1 -3
RCe -0
RC -0
LR2 -2
LG -1
Raw 94 Scaled 174
I brushed up on RC strategy this morning before the PT so hopefully that helped. There were some bitchin LRs on this one though that even going back I am not sure why tcr is such.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login