The Official June 2016 Study Group Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by Hennessy » Tue May 31, 2016 5:29 pm

forum_user wrote:Deep dish pizza is just half-assed casserole with soggy crust fight me
cosign

Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by Hennessy » Tue May 31, 2016 5:31 pm

forum_user wrote:Now THIS--this is pizza
Image
DC style slice, y'all don't know bout that shit

User avatar
proteinshake

Gold
Posts: 4643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by proteinshake » Tue May 31, 2016 5:47 pm

HennessyVSOP wrote:
forum_user wrote:Now THIS--this is pizza
Image
DC style slice, y'all don't know bout that shit
I went to a place in DC called "Jumbo Slice" that seems similar to this but it wasn't good. I think it was a drunk food spot though.

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by Mikey » Tue May 31, 2016 5:49 pm

HennessyVSOP wrote:
forum_user wrote:Now THIS--this is pizza
Image
DC style slice, y'all don't know bout that shit
"Yeah I'm on a diet so I will have just 1 slice of pizza" LMAO.

Hennessy

Gold
Posts: 2516
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by Hennessy » Tue May 31, 2016 5:55 pm

proteinshake wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:
forum_user wrote:Now THIS--this is pizza
Image
DC style slice, y'all don't know bout that shit
I went to a place in DC called "Jumbo Slice" that seems similar to this but it wasn't good. I think it was a drunk food spot though.
no yeah that's exactly what this is
DC jumbo slices
drunk food

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
tofuspeedstar

Platinum
Posts: 8121
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:54 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by tofuspeedstar » Tue May 31, 2016 6:04 pm

Best of luck this weekend guys, you're gonna crush it. Wish I had gotten ready in time for this one instead of September/December.

User avatar
forum_user

Silver
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by forum_user » Tue May 31, 2016 6:18 pm

HennessyVSOP wrote:
proteinshake wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:
forum_user wrote:Now THIS--this is pizza
Image
DC style slice, y'all don't know bout that shit
I went to a place in DC called "Jumbo Slice" that seems similar to this but it wasn't good. I think it was a drunk food spot though.
no yeah that's exactly what this is
DC jumbo slices
drunk food
TCR

Can't imagine getting it when not tipsy though lol I feel like I'd just be disappointed

User avatar
proteinshake

Gold
Posts: 4643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by proteinshake » Tue May 31, 2016 6:21 pm

forum_user wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:
proteinshake wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:
forum_user wrote:Now THIS--this is pizza
Image
DC style slice, y'all don't know bout that shit
I went to a place in DC called "Jumbo Slice" that seems similar to this but it wasn't good. I think it was a drunk food spot though.
no yeah that's exactly what this is
DC jumbo slices
drunk food
TCR

Can't imagine getting it when not tipsy though lol I feel like I'd just be disappointed
LOL I had it sober, but it was 2AM so I didn't have many options in the area I was in.

User avatar
forum_user

Silver
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by forum_user » Tue May 31, 2016 6:24 pm

proteinshake wrote:
forum_user wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:
proteinshake wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:
forum_user wrote:Now THIS--this is pizza
Image
DC style slice, y'all don't know bout that shit
I went to a place in DC called "Jumbo Slice" that seems similar to this but it wasn't good. I think it was a drunk food spot though.
no yeah that's exactly what this is
DC jumbo slices
drunk food
TCR

Can't imagine getting it when not tipsy though lol I feel like I'd just be disappointed
LOL I had it sober, but it was 2AM so I didn't have many options in the area I was in.
Actually that's a lie I'd still be down to munch. You have to be in a certain mood though, similar to the taco bell mood

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
proteinshake

Gold
Posts: 4643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by proteinshake » Tue May 31, 2016 6:28 pm

forum_user wrote:
proteinshake wrote:
forum_user wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:
proteinshake wrote:
HennessyVSOP wrote:
forum_user wrote:Now THIS--this is pizza
Image
DC style slice, y'all don't know bout that shit
I went to a place in DC called "Jumbo Slice" that seems similar to this but it wasn't good. I think it was a drunk food spot though.
no yeah that's exactly what this is
DC jumbo slices
drunk food
TCR

Can't imagine getting it when not tipsy though lol I feel like I'd just be disappointed
LOL I had it sober, but it was 2AM so I didn't have many options in the area I was in.
Actually that's a lie I'd still be down to munch. You have to be in a certain mood though, similar to the taco bell mood
ahh you are speaking the truth right now.

ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Tue May 31, 2016 8:15 pm

tofuspeedstar wrote:Best of luck this weekend guys, you're gonna crush it. Wish I had gotten ready in time for this one instead of September/December.
Thanks broseph!

And APB for all June 2016 test takers, don't be confused (e.g., Jeeves), the test is NOT, in fact, this weekend. It is on Monday! Strength and honor.

lawpro82

New
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:55 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by lawpro82 » Tue May 31, 2016 8:18 pm

Alright, I gotta get us off food

Anybody wanna take a stab at what the flawed logic is in any of these ads:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy34Xkb0k4k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J22lWqc ... dPPoJmj58N

ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Tue May 31, 2016 8:21 pm

And I'm going to add my 2 cents to the great pizza debate. As a dood who went to Colorado for school, any debate on the relative merits of pizza would be incomplete without Beau Jo's. Mother...Fucking...Mountain...Pies! Nom nom bitches.

Image

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
proteinshake

Gold
Posts: 4643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by proteinshake » Tue May 31, 2016 8:33 pm

UGH NOW I WANT PIZZA

User avatar
forum_user

Silver
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by forum_user » Tue May 31, 2016 8:52 pm

lawpro82 wrote:Alright, I gotta get us off food

Anybody wanna take a stab at what the flawed logic is in any of these ads:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy34Xkb0k4k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J22lWqc ... dPPoJmj58N
"Presumes, without providing justification, that because a policy has a certain effect, it is intended to have that effect" :wink:

User avatar
appind

Gold
Posts: 2266
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by appind » Tue May 31, 2016 9:14 pm

lawpro82 wrote:Alright, I gotta get us off food

Anybody wanna take a stab at what the flawed logic is in any of these ads:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy34Xkb0k4k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J22lWqc ... dPPoJmj58N
overlooks the fact that men could be superior drivers despite not receiving bonus reward from the auto insurance

presumes that a company not performing an action that could lead to potential benefit for an animal implies the company hates the animal.

User avatar
ayylmao

Silver
Posts: 543
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:38 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by ayylmao » Tue May 31, 2016 10:11 pm

ponderingmeerkat wrote:And I'm going to add my 2 cents to the great pizza debate. As a dood who went to Colorado for school, any debate on the relative merits of pizza would be incomplete without Beau Jo's. Mother...Fucking...Mountain...Pies! Nom nom bitches.

Image
Too much crust. Come to NJ. 8)

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
ayylmao

Silver
Posts: 543
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:38 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by ayylmao » Tue May 31, 2016 10:13 pm

lawpro82 wrote:Alright, I gotta get us off food

Anybody wanna take a stab at what the flawed logic is in any of these ads:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy34Xkb0k4k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J22lWqc ... dPPoJmj58N
Presumes, without providing justification, that a property that applies to an individual within a group must apply to the group as a whole. :lol:

StopLawying

Silver
Posts: 691
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:23 am

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by StopLawying » Tue May 31, 2016 10:21 pm

So sometimes I watch these 7sage explanations and think to myself there's no freakin way I would've gotten that set up in real time. Look at PT 38 G4 for example. Did you guys go with a similar setup or did you just brute force? This game wrecked me

User avatar
New_Spice180

Bronze
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 11:01 am

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by New_Spice180 » Tue May 31, 2016 10:22 pm

Hey guys,

I'm taking the LSAT in September, but I wanted your seasoned opinion on how best to drill. I've been drilling for a bit now and I feel like I'm improving but spending a bit too much time on each packet. For instance, I'm currently finishing flaw and moving on to Inference, but the issue is I have 90 or so questions. How did you all go through drilling for LR, did you stop when you saw your scoring become perfect( because even with drilling 60 questions I still had a bit of trouble on the harder higher level questions). I'm aiming for 175+ so those who are hitting around that range, give your wisdom!!!!!

Thanks!

lawpro82

New
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:55 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by lawpro82 » Tue May 31, 2016 10:57 pm

New_Spice180 wrote:Hey guys,

I'm taking the LSAT in September, but I wanted your seasoned opinion on how best to drill. I've been drilling for a bit now and I feel like I'm improving but spending a bit too much time on each packet. For instance, I'm currently finishing flaw and moving on to Inference, but the issue is I have 90 or so questions. How did you all go through drilling for LR, did you stop when you saw your scoring become perfect( because even with drilling 60 questions I still had a bit of trouble on the harder higher level questions). I'm aiming for 175+ so those who are hitting around that range, give your wisdom!!!!!

Thanks!
The best way to drill is to pre answer. You can pre answer about 80% of the questions, especially strengthen, weaken, method of reasoning, flaw, and resolve the discrepancy type of questions. Don't drill with time until you get into the 90+% accuracy range.

Take every answer you ever get wrong, cut it out and paste it to a 3x5 card. Go back a month or so later and go through all the ones you missed and answer them again. See what your new accuracy rate is with the new LSAT skills you acquired

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


footballlax55

New
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 2:33 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by footballlax55 » Tue May 31, 2016 11:27 pm

pretzeltime wrote:
mjjames wrote:
there is a shift in some sections since late 60, but not so much to make this big difference. it depends if your drop is due to those changes.

what were your typical section scores before the drop and after?
The drop has been coming primarily from RC sections. I've been getting -4 to -6 regularly since PT 72, from -3 to -0 pre-72.
I think that is common, RCs do get a bit harder in the 70s.

HOWEVER, do you think there is any possibility that you are burned out on RC and not able to put your complete effort into practice sections of it? Like, maybe you're putting 95% effort but not that last 5%?

I think that can happen with burnout and RC is the section most likely to suffer if that is the case because it requires a longer attention span/does not have answer that are as clear cut.

I thought I had the same problem as you but recently took pt75 and got 0 wrong on RC, hoping to perform similarly tomorrow on 76.

But if others have theories?
I think it's due to the RC slightly changing and also not being 100% focused on the reading section.

I've seen similar things happen sometimes. My average score on reading from the old to new tests is fairly similar, but the new tests are more of a crapshoot. If I'm not focused and/or get bogged down on one question, I'm rushed the whole rest of the time and making tons of stupid mistakes.

Meanwhile on the old tests I feel like even if I wasn't 100% focused the questions didn't share inferences about the passage tone etc. So I might miss a single one and/or find it easier to just rush through that one question and move one. I think it was also easier to use POE on the old ones and narrow it down to a couple answer choices but now there are more questions where you look at it and have no clue what the correct answer is.

I'm just hoping that come Monday I'm bringing my A game because I'm fine when I perform 100%, but if I get too distracted I'm screwed. I range 0-5 on reading for that reason. LG is kinda similar. If I slack off in the middle of a section and don't keep up the pace I find myself rushing a bunch towards the end. Or if I miss a rule when writing them down and do the entire game incorrectly then I can be screwed. I also go 0-5 in LG.

I much prefer Lr because worst case scenario I spend too much time on a few questions and am a little rushed. And since theyre not all linked together in groups of 5-8 like LG or R, it's much easier to recover if I mess up a little. It only affects one. So I'm way more consistent with them.

User avatar
Rupert Pupkin

Gold
Posts: 2170
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by Rupert Pupkin » Wed Jun 01, 2016 12:13 am

New_Spice180 wrote:Hey guys,

I'm taking the LSAT in September, but I wanted your seasoned opinion on how best to drill. I've been drilling for a bit now and I feel like I'm improving but spending a bit too much time on each packet. For instance, I'm currently finishing flaw and moving on to Inference, but the issue is I have 90 or so questions. How did you all go through drilling for LR, did you stop when you saw your scoring become perfect( because even with drilling 60 questions I still had a bit of trouble on the harder higher level questions). I'm aiming for 175+ so those who are hitting around that range, give your wisdom!!!!!

Thanks!
I was thinking the same thing while I am drilling. I was going to break it up into 25 Q sections and do 2 "sets" right now once or twice and then leave 2 to come back to later, in a few chapters. I think that will help to check to make sure i retained all the strats. Thats the approach I am taking, don't know if its the best way or recommended way.

And god, I hate you all with these junk food posts. I have never thought about pretzels and pizza so much before until now...

User avatar
New_Spice180

Bronze
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 11:01 am

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by New_Spice180 » Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:24 am

lawpro82 wrote:
New_Spice180 wrote:Hey guys,

I'm taking the LSAT in September, but I wanted your seasoned opinion on how best to drill. I've been drilling for a bit now and I feel like I'm improving but spending a bit too much time on each packet. For instance, I'm currently finishing flaw and moving on to Inference, but the issue is I have 90 or so questions. How did you all go through drilling for LR, did you stop when you saw your scoring become perfect( because even with drilling 60 questions I still had a bit of trouble on the harder higher level questions). I'm aiming for 175+ so those who are hitting around that range, give your wisdom!!!!!

Thanks!
The best way to drill is to pre answer. You can pre answer about 80% of the questions, especially strengthen, weaken, method of reasoning, flaw, and resolve the discrepancy type of questions. Don't drill with time until you get into the 90+% accuracy range.

Take every answer you ever get wrong, cut it out and paste it to a 3x5 card. Go back a month or so later and go through all the ones you missed and answer them again. See what your new accuracy rate is with the new LSAT skills you acquired
I think that this approach definitely will help me hone my skills especially on those questions. I've marked "review" above the questions that I had trouble finding the answer or just got plan wrong. I'll definitely try this out!

User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: The Official June 2016 Study Group

Post by pretzeltime » Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:20 am

5 dayss

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”