If you read the instructions like you're SUPPOSED to, the LG section clearly said to take a hit of that good shit before you begin the last game. LSAC might be wondering why I was drawing monopoly buildings on my answer sheet.SunDevil14 wrote:Pozzo wrote:That's me on the right.laqueredup wrote:
Post the image that best correlates to your brain during game 4.
Seems about right, once I got to game 4 I was wondering if the test makers were going to pass the crack pipe.
real The Official December 2016 Waiters Group - Patience is a Virtue Forum
- Instrumental
- Posts: 1393
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:38 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
.
Last edited by latetothis on Mon Apr 10, 2017 5:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Greenteachurro
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 11:20 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Okay completely pointless guess at my score
Lr 1:-1
LR 2: -3
RC: -2
Lg: -2
Lr 1:-1
LR 2: -3
RC: -2
Lg: -2
- VMars
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:06 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Think all the LR you mentioned are real (I had exp RC)latetothis wrote:Checking in. I had LR-RC-LR-LG-LR. I took September's test and got a 164, and this one seemed WAY easier. I'm slightly worried that I missed something because I don't trust that it could've been this easy, especially when I didn't study nearly as much as I should have since finding out my Sept. score AND because I was operating on 4 hours of sleep, max. Also worried about the curve not being so generous if the test really was that easy (either way, I lose!)
LG is my worst section, so I was happy to not have an experimental LG like I did in September. Loved the Rawls passage in RC, since I was a philosophy major. I find science-y passages most difficult to stay interested in, so fMRI was a bit challenging.
I suspected during the test that the second LR was experimental because it almost seemed like LSAC was playing a joke on us with some of the answer choices. They seemed too ridiculous/tongue-in-cheek to be real. Kind of concerning, but I don't recognize a single one of the experimental LR questions listed on PowerScore. Random questions I remember having trouble with: students waking up early/teenage driver accidents, Television station with a very highly watched program (Bliss), and Global warming and ocean levels (also a question on a car dealership selling a record number of cars, and most of its customers coming from a certain town). I ran out of time and guessed on Australia/South America reptiles (iguanas) coming on rafts across Pacific and Cat Food, but I think I got those.
LG seemed to go fairly smoothly except for the last game, which I never expect to finish anyway. I answered two of the questions in a rush, and guessed on the last three. The game would've been doable if I had more time, even though it was unconventional.
Most importantly, BREWPUB on Carlene Blvd all the way! I'm all for taking risks, but not dumb ones like opening a production brewery when all you want to do is to make a good product and experiment with different beer. Just sayin'
Sept. breakdown was:
LR1 -6
RC -1
LG -8
LR2 -4
Prediction for this time around:
LR1 -3
RC -1
LR2 - 4
LG -4
170 or over would be a dream, but I'll guess high 160s. Fingers crossed. Good luck to everyone here!!
- SunDevil14
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2016 7:35 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Damn, I knew I shouldn't have smoked it all during break.Instrumental wrote:If you read the instructions like you're SUPPOSED to, the LG section clearly said to take a hit of that good shit before you begin the last game. LSAC might be wondering why I was drawing monopoly buildings on my answer sheet.SunDevil14 wrote:Pozzo wrote:That's me on the right.laqueredup wrote:
Post the image that best correlates to your brain during game 4.
Seems about right, once I got to game 4 I was wondering if the test makers were going to pass the crack pipe.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cherrygalore
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:13 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
No clue, but here is my shot in the dark:
LR1: -1
LR2: -2
RC: -0
LG: -4
LR1: -1
LR2: -2
RC: -0
LG: -4
- amta
- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
LR1: -4
RC: -6
LR2: -2
LG: -0
RC: -6
LR2: -2
LG: -0
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
.
Last edited by dj9i27 on Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dontsaywhatyoumean
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:35 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Is RC generally your weaker section?amta wrote:LR1: -4
RC: -6
LR2: -2
LG: -0
Anyway, for me,
-2/3 lr
-2/3 lr
-2/3 rc
-9-11 lg??
(Totally may have gone -1 on any of those non LG sections too though. I'm just saying -3 because I suppose I may have done that poorly. I only really recall maybe 1/2 per section where I felt confused.)

- cherrygalore
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:13 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
No, I've always been an RC/LR kind of gal. But usually go -1 on LG. I guess I just feel uncertain about the last game so I'd rather assume I did the worst and be pleasantly surprised than vice versa.dj9i27 wrote:-4 on LG? Wasn't that your fortecherrygalore wrote:No clue, but here is my shot in the dark:
LR1: -1
LR2: -2
RC: -0
LG: -4
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
wow super exhausted after this weekend.
- dontsaywhatyoumean
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:35 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Anything other than the LSAT contribute to this?34iplaw wrote:wow super exhausted after this weekend.
- amta
- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
yeah it usually is and i didnt feel great about the 4th passage. first LR im giving. a -4 because of the girl having a very audible panic attack next to me for most of the section.dontsaywhatyoumean wrote:Is RC generally your weaker section?amta wrote:LR1: -4
RC: -6
LR2: -2
LG: -0
Anyway, for me,
-2/3 lr
-2/3 lr
-2/3 rc
-9-11 lg??
(Totally may have gone -1 on any of those non LG sections too though. I'm just saying -3 because I suppose I may have done that poorly. I only really recall maybe 1/2 per section where I felt confused.)
at LG
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Quizasdontsaywhatyoumean wrote:Anything other than the LSAT contribute to this?34iplaw wrote:wow super exhausted after this weekend.
Quizas
Quizas
- dontsaywhatyoumean
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:35 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Alright34iplaw wrote:Quizasdontsaywhatyoumean wrote:Anything other than the LSAT contribute to this?34iplaw wrote:wow super exhausted after this weekend.
Quizas
Quizas
Alright
Alright
- cherrygalore
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:13 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Me too.34iplaw wrote:wow super exhausted after this weekend.
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Just doing a little late night reading...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- cherrygalore
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:13 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Haha you need to put a trigger warning before that!Pozzo wrote:Just doing a little late night reading...
- bearedman8
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:43 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
MRW I realize that I might have misread a sufficient condition as a necessary one in an LR question I thought I got right.
- laqueredup
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 1:05 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
I was laughing to myself because I kept thinking of this video during the writing sample:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3SVj0aAciU0
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3SVj0aAciU0
- Instrumental
- Posts: 1393
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
I fell asleep before 9 pm last night. Goddamncherrygalore wrote:Me too.34iplaw wrote:wow super exhausted after this weekend.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- VMars
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:06 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
When it's the end of the term and you could cruise on your last 2 papers for the A or die for the A+
Don't even have my 'gotta study for the lsat!!' excuse

- Greenteachurro
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 11:20 am
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
hmm I'm pretty worried about my second LR i kinda powered through it because it was my last section and i didn't check the time when we started the section so I had very little sense of pacing. Finished the section 5 minutes early, went back and checked my circled questions and even had time after that to completely go over the first ten questions and double check. So I don't know.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
I've been procrastinating forever for my final two papers (one of which I have along with it a presentation this week and it requires a lot of reading which I haven't started)VMars wrote:When it's the end of the term and you could cruise on your last 2 papers for the A or die for the A+Don't even have my 'gotta study for the lsat!!' excuse

-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group
Ok, so #teambrewpub has the popular vote. But could production brewery win the electoral vote? That couldn't possibly happen, right?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login