-11 Curve, September 2017 Waiter's Thread Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

What did you get?

Poll ended at Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:19 am

180-178
10
7%
177-175
15
11%
174-172
18
13%
171-169
21
15%
168-166
23
17%
165-160
27
20%
159-155
13
9%
154-150
7
5%
<150
4
3%
 
Total votes: 138

User avatar
sodomojo

Bronze
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:17 am

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by sodomojo » Sun Sep 17, 2017 8:48 pm

abujabal wrote:"Are you comfortable writing long, multi-page essays on a digital device"

As their MCs before the certifying statement instead of the typical "how did you prepare?" It seems to be an indication that this test could be about to go digital, and given that last question, maybe even change format? (Essays instead of MC?)
That has to be in reference to the writing sample. I don't see how it could be about anything else.

User avatar
april_ludgate

Bronze
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 9:28 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by april_ludgate » Sun Sep 17, 2017 8:54 pm

Barry grandpapy wrote:I really thought cuddlefishing would take the cake
I actually don't remember any question about a cuttlefish and now I'm questioning my whole test experience/memory :shock:

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Mikey » Sun Sep 17, 2017 8:57 pm

so who is going to be the first person to pic whore

velyvely

New
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:32 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by velyvely » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:10 pm

Does anyone know if the September curve will be released the same day of score release? And when the test itself gets released for sale?

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Mikey » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:12 pm

velyvely wrote:Does anyone know if the September curve will be released the same day of score release? And when the test itself gets released for sale?
yeah. they will give everyone who gets a score the chart that shows the scores/how many to get wrong for a score

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Lalalsat96

New
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:35 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Lalalsat96 » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:14 pm

Mikey wrote:
heyduchess wrote:
Lalalsat96 wrote:Im pretty salty that on the June 2017 LSAT. I got 25/27 questions right for RC and the games were relatively easy in June. AND Then in september i guessed all my answers for the final 2 passages. My score can either go amazing or real really bad october. I am over this

*goes to write an out of this world PS and researches about the GRE*
This is where I am. I missed 2 on RC in June and I'm pretty sure I missed 12 on this RC.

But who knows! We all thought we bombed that inference passage.
I'm like 99% sure this RC will be lowest ever.

I thought the second one was easy but for some reason I thought the rest were hard.. Didn't even get to finish the fourth passage... I low key freaked tho

By you didnt finish do you mean you guessed and bubbled in something or do you mean you literally didnt bubble ? I am in the former bc I couldnt bare dealing with the latter of leaving blank answers *cringe

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Mikey » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:20 pm

Lalalsat96 wrote:
Mikey wrote:
heyduchess wrote:
Lalalsat96 wrote:Im pretty salty that on the June 2017 LSAT. I got 25/27 questions right for RC and the games were relatively easy in June. AND Then in september i guessed all my answers for the final 2 passages. My score can either go amazing or real really bad october. I am over this

*goes to write an out of this world PS and researches about the GRE*
This is where I am. I missed 2 on RC in June and I'm pretty sure I missed 12 on this RC.

But who knows! We all thought we bombed that inference passage.
I'm like 99% sure this RC will be lowest ever.

I thought the second one was easy but for some reason I thought the rest were hard.. Didn't even get to finish the fourth passage... I low key freaked tho

By you didnt finish do you mean you guessed and bubbled in something or do you mean you literally didnt bubble ? I am in the former bc I couldnt bare dealing with the latter of leaving blank answers *cringe
no no noooooo, I bubbled things in lol. I'm dumb enough to let that RC passage fuck me, but I'm not dumb enough to leave things blank haha

velyvely

New
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:32 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by velyvely » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:22 pm

Mikey wrote:
velyvely wrote:Does anyone know if the September curve will be released the same day of score release? And when the test itself gets released for sale?
yeah. they will give everyone who gets a score the chart that shows the scores/how many to get wrong for a score
Oooh okay, thanks! Sigh.

Lalalsat96

New
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:35 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Lalalsat96 » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:31 pm

Mikey wrote:
no no noooooo, I bubbled things in lol. I'm dumb enough to let that RC passage fuck me, but I'm not dumb enough to leave things blank haha
Ook haha then you arent that fucked. It may have gone well as said before maybe we all are just freaking out ( i doubt it tho) ?


Side note: does anyone remember how many questions were for judges/candor and in Freud/marx? I want to determine how many RC i could have gotten wrong?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Impressionist

Bronze
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 10:24 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Impressionist » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:37 pm

The 4 passages went, in terms of the number of questions per passage, 6-7-8-6.

Lalalsat96

New
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:35 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Lalalsat96 » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:50 pm

Impressionist wrote:The 4 passages went, in terms of the number of questions per passage, 6-7-8-6.
Judges had 8 questions?! (My memory of yesterday has pretty much blurred) F$#k like actually why does lsac hate us. I wish i could go back to june 2017 :roll:

former_yooper

New
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:43 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by former_yooper » Sun Sep 17, 2017 9:54 pm

Lalalsat96 wrote:
Impressionist wrote:The 4 passages went, in terms of the number of questions per passage, 6-7-8-6.
Judges had 8 questions?! (My memory of yesterday has pretty much blurred) F$#k like actually why does lsac hate us. I wish i could go back to june 2017 :roll:
It definitely had 8. I remember because I always do the longest one first and I started with it and thus fucked myself for the other passages :cry:

merdblah

New
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:53 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by merdblah » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:08 pm

april_ludgate wrote:
Barry grandpapy wrote:I really thought cuddlefishing would take the cake
I actually don't remember any question about a cuttlefish and now I'm questioning my whole test experience/memory :shock:
...same... I'm usually pretty good with remembering prompt topics and such too.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
GnarMarBinx

Bronze
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 3:21 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by GnarMarBinx » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:09 pm

Lalalsat96 wrote:
Impressionist wrote:The 4 passages went, in terms of the number of questions per passage, 6-7-8-6.
Judges had 8 questions?! (My memory of yesterday has pretty much blurred) F$#k like actually why does lsac hate us. I wish i could go back to june 2017 :roll:
I'm pretty sure it was 7-6-8-6. Didn't the first passage have 7 questions?

Lxwind

New
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:30 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Lxwind » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:14 pm

Am I the only one who feel that the first 2 passages weren't that easy :shock: ?

dietcoked

Bronze
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 11:33 pm

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by dietcoked » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:17 pm

april_ludgate wrote:
Barry grandpapy wrote:I really thought cuddlefishing would take the cake
I actually don't remember any question about a cuttlefish and now I'm questioning my whole test experience/memory :shock:
Me too what is this cuttlefish others speak of

Lalalsat96

New
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:35 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Lalalsat96 » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:23 pm

Lxwind wrote:Am I the only one who feel that the first 2 passages weren't that easy :shock: ?

No they were not easy but they werent hard exactly. The topics were a bit dry and thats coming from someone who likes RC because its like read fun little articles about something new. The first 2 were fine i guess judges just ate up so much time and then that made the last passage seem harder since, at least for me, i was short on time. There were no "easy" passages for me where i knew i got all the questions right but the first 2 were doable by LSAT standards imo
Last edited by Lalalsat96 on Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


littlewing67

Silver
Posts: 779
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by littlewing67 » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:23 pm

.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Lxwind

New
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:30 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Lxwind » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:35 pm

Lalalsat96 wrote:
Lxwind wrote:Am I the only one who feel that the first 2 passages weren't that easy :shock: ?

No they were not easy but they werent hard exactly. The topics were a big dry and thats coming from someone who like RC because its like read fun little articles about something new. The first 2 were fine i guess judges just ate up so much time and then that made the last passage seem harder since, at least for me, i was short on time. There were no "easy" passages for me where i knew i got all the questions right but the first 2 were doable by LSAT standards imo
I have really weird feelings about the RC section...the first passage took me 9 minutes, and I was highly uncertain about around 2 questions, then the second passage I wasn't sure about my answers either. When I finished the two 15 minutes passed, which seemed fine time-wise. I don't feel the judges passage was that awful, I only circled one question as highly uncertain(couldn't find support for any of the answers, had to guess), went to Marx with 8~9 minutes left, finished it in 6~7 minutes feeling pretty confident about that one.. Then I spent the last 1~2 minutes on the question I circled under Judges, still couldn't find the support, completely wasted the time and didn't change a thing. Now I feel I should've spent my last minute on either of the first two passages, since I may have left some points on table. If I could just take a look at the passage again and check my uncertain answers...UGH IDK, the entire section just felt difficult. But I'm not good at RC so who knows ╮(╯_╰)╭

Barry grandpapy

Bronze
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Barry grandpapy » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:47 pm

Taking new poll ideas. Otherwise we're stuck w/ whatever my drunk mind comes up with in the next hour

User avatar
Impressionist

Bronze
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 10:24 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Impressionist » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:56 pm

GnarMarBinx wrote:
Lalalsat96 wrote:
Impressionist wrote:The 4 passages went, in terms of the number of questions per passage, 6-7-8-6.
Judges had 8 questions?! (My memory of yesterday has pretty much blurred) F$#k like actually why does lsac hate us. I wish i could go back to june 2017 :roll:
I'm pretty sure it was 7-6-8-6. Didn't the first passage have 7 questions?
Possible. I may have gotten the first two confused but like you say the last two were definitely 8 and 6.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
creed

Bronze
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:08 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by creed » Sun Sep 17, 2017 11:34 pm

Judges had 8 but if I remember correctly like 4 of them were pretty straightforward weren't they? Unless my memory is more comforting than it should be lol

Barry grandpapy

Bronze
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Barry grandpapy » Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:08 am

NEW POLL

Lalalsat96

New
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:35 pm

Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Lalalsat96 » Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:48 am

creed wrote:Judges had 8 but if I remember correctly like 4 of them were pretty straightforward weren't they? Unless my memory is more comforting than it should be lol
There were straightforward ones but they ate up a lot of time for me. Usually RC is easier for me... idek i just want my score atm

User avatar
Jack_Kelly

Silver
Posts: 900
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am

Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread

Post by Jack_Kelly » Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:54 am

april_ludgate wrote:
Barry grandpapy wrote:I really thought cuddlefishing would take the cake
I actually don't remember any question about a cuttlefish and now I'm questioning my whole test experience/memory :shock:
Oh thank god, this way I can go back to assuming people who don't find me funny are just missing something.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”