Feb Waiters: is TODAY the DAY? [New Poll] Forum
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:15 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
And I wrote on both sides of the sheet but I have pretty big handwriting.
Anyone else take it at Chapman law?
Anyone else take it at Chapman law?
- nrand001
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:28 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
It's either section 1 or 4. Pretty sure it was the 1st though, overall weird LR section and the difficulty was up there as well!calbear123 wrote:Anyone else find the bebop RC passage to be pretty difficult btw?
Also, just wanted to check one last time. For those of you that did NOT have LR experimental section, you don't remember the british/small knights question? It was the first one of the section so if you don't remember this it will be very very relieving for me to know that it was exp. That was one hard ass section.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:10 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
Hahahaha, I would have told her "you're writing sample isn't going to make up for your utter failure on the LG section you just did".TERS wrote:Awesome. I was worried I got that canoe/rowboat one wrong.
Some chick was actually going so hard during the writing sample at my location. It was nuts. Some guy was rocking his feet and she fucking freaked on him.
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:29 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
She was just a shitty person generally. Late initially and after the break. Nice ass though.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:10 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
Maybe better luck marrying a lawyer than being one.TERS wrote:She was just a shitty person generally. Late initially and after the break. Nice ass though.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
I still am truly baffled by all the assholes who voted -7. Asinine.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
-8 is more acceptable, but still dumb. -9 is feasible, but pretty doubtful.
- princeR
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:10 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
Does anyone really think the curve could possibly be lower than a -10? It felt like a -10, maybe -11, but a -9 would be brutal.ws81086n wrote:I still am truly baffled by all the assholes who voted -7. Asinine.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
It really would be. No way -9. -10 or -11. Between LR, a reasonably challenging RC, and a LG that people are slightly underestimating the difficult of, we'll make it to -10 at least.princeR wrote:Does anyone really think the curve could possibly be lower than a -10? It felt like a -10, maybe -11, but a -9 would be brutal.ws81086n wrote:I still am truly baffled by all the assholes who voted -7. Asinine.
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:29 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
ws, stop taking it so seriously. lol. it'll won't be worse than -9, surely
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
There hasn't been a -9 or lower since October of '08, and I definitely think there have been easier tests since that time. My guess is that it's very likely to be either -10 or -11.princeR wrote:Does anyone really think the curve could possibly be lower than a -10? It felt like a -10, maybe -11, but a -9 would be brutal.ws81086n wrote:I still am truly baffled by all the assholes who voted -7. Asinine.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
secondedEconomist Erik wrote:There hasn't been a -9 or lower since October of '08, and I definitely think there have been easier tests since that time. My guess is that it's very likely to be either -10 or -11.princeR wrote:Does anyone really think the curve could possibly be lower than a -10? It felt like a -10, maybe -11, but a -9 would be brutal.ws81086n wrote:I still am truly baffled by all the assholes who voted -7. Asinine.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
+14 is what I'm hoping for. I'm shooting for a 165 and I figure I can about 21 and hit that and I'm guessing I missed 21 exactly so here's to hoping..
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:13 am
Re: Feb Waiters
All right, my two cents on this test. I did all the tests from ~40 on.
I think it's going to be around -11. The RC first section was difficult and so was the 26 question LR section.
I'm shooting for a 169 to 170 and I think my scores will correspond to a score around the upper 160s.
My predictions:
LR 1 (26Q) : 22
LR 2 (25Q): 23
RC (27Q): 22
LG (23Q): 22
--------------------------
I think it's going to be around -11. The RC first section was difficult and so was the 26 question LR section.
I'm shooting for a 169 to 170 and I think my scores will correspond to a score around the upper 160s.
My predictions:
LR 1 (26Q) : 22
LR 2 (25Q): 23
RC (27Q): 22
LG (23Q): 22
--------------------------
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- eav1277
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am
Re: Feb Waiters
mod edit
Last edited by eav1277 on Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
- eav1277
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am
Re: Feb Waiters
mod edit
Last edited by eav1277 on Sun Feb 10, 2013 4:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login