On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- Refractory Period Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Locked
User avatar
PlugInBaby

Bronze
Posts: 386
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:40 am

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by PlugInBaby » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:42 pm

jpSartre wrote:
CryingMonkey wrote:bold words, zworykin - hope you're right!

Personally, I'm really hoping that the destruction I rained down on the writing sample will make up for the rest of my test. I think I'll get at least a 175 based solely on my essay.
Country 2 FTW
Indeed.....Country 2 had worthwhile things as well and a way better chance to experience the main inspiration on why the Ortegas wanted to take a vacation in the first place.

I must say though in a selfish way hearing that high PT acheivers such as KnockGlock had some moments of hurrying and frustration sort of makes me feel better about my prospects (They are mortal too.) Sure its like lighting a cigarette off of a person in fire...but thanks for the encouragement :)

User avatar
CryingMonkey

Bronze
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 1:22 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by CryingMonkey » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:44 pm

I hate to weigh in, but anyone repping country one clearly hasn't read my writing sample. If you had, you would definitely repent and come to where it's at. My logic was relentless, my prose lurid, my conclusions inescapable. Country two - it's like country one, only better in every way.

User avatar
Knock

Platinum
Posts: 5151
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by Knock » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:44 pm

Country 1 all day baby!

User avatar
jpSartre

Bronze
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:05 am

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by jpSartre » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:45 pm

PlugInBaby wrote:
jpSartre wrote:
CryingMonkey wrote:bold words, zworykin - hope you're right!

Personally, I'm really hoping that the destruction I rained down on the writing sample will make up for the rest of my test. I think I'll get at least a 175 based solely on my essay.
Country 2 FTW
Indeed.....Country 2 had worthwhile things as well and a way better chance to experience the main inspiration on why the Ortegas wanted to take a vacation in the first place.
That's what I'm sayin.

User avatar
Barbie

Gold
Posts: 3746
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:51 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by Barbie » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:46 pm

Knockglock wrote:Country 1 all day baby!
woop woop

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
zworykin

Bronze
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:18 am

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by zworykin » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:47 pm

CryingMonkey wrote:I hate to weigh in, but anyone repping country one clearly hasn't read my writing sample. If you had, you would definitely repent and come to where it's at. My logic was relentless, my prose lurid, my conclusions inescapable. Country two - it's like country one, only better in every way.
Plus when the guerillas finally finish overthrowing that weakass C2 government, that poor family will never even have another chance to visit!

User avatar
Chimica

New
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:30 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by Chimica » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:54 pm

So the fact I added a cartoon to my essay...How badly would that hurt me?

It made sense to me. I just thought they should rent a plane and that would solve everything.

Though by the time I wrote that, I was deep into country 2 in my essay. But, then I would have chosen C2 anyhow.


(This only makes sense if you got the same writing prompt I guess)

User avatar
James Bond

Gold
Posts: 2344
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by James Bond » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:54 pm

darby girl wrote:
Knockglock wrote:Country 1 all day baby!
woop woop
hoo-rah

tomwatts

Gold
Posts: 1710
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by tomwatts » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:59 pm

CryingMonkey wrote:my prose lurid
o.O

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Shrimps

Bronze
Posts: 269
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by Shrimps » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:11 am

tomwatts wrote:
CryingMonkey wrote:my prose lurid
o.O
That may've been "lucid". Thank God there is no vocabulary section on the LSAT.

itseightfortyfive

New
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 1:20 am

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by itseightfortyfive » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:13 am

PlugInBaby wrote:
jpSartre wrote:
CryingMonkey wrote:bold words, zworykin - hope you're right!

Personally, I'm really hoping that the destruction I rained down on the writing sample will make up for the rest of my test. I think I'll get at least a 175 based solely on my essay.
Country 2 FTW
Indeed.....Country 2 had worthwhile things as well and a way better chance to experience the main inspiration on why the Ortegas wanted to take a vacation in the first place.

I must say though in a selfish way hearing that high PT acheivers such as KnockGlock had some moments of hurrying and frustration sort of makes me feel better about my prospects (They are mortal too.) Sure its like lighting a cigarette off of a person in fire...but thanks for the encouragement :)

Country 2 allllll the way!

itseightfortyfive

New
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 1:20 am

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by itseightfortyfive » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:14 am

Chimica wrote:So the fact I added a cartoon to my essay...How badly would that hurt me?

It made sense to me. I just thought they should rent a plane and that would solve everything.

Though by the time I wrote that, I was deep into country 2 in my essay. But, then I would have chosen C2 anyhow.


(This only makes sense if you got the same writing prompt I guess)

LOLZZZ one of my really good friends in HS on one of those standardized test you have to take to graduate wrote "Train of thought derailing" and drew a picture of a train.

User avatar
zworykin

Bronze
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:18 am

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by zworykin » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:14 am

Shrimps wrote:
tomwatts wrote:
CryingMonkey wrote:my prose lurid
o.O
That may've been "lucid". Thank God there is no vocabulary section on the LSAT.

Lurid:
1. vivid in shocking detail; sensational

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
oxford_don

Bronze
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:06 am

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- Refractory Period

Post by oxford_don » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:15 am

Country 2 what up

Shrimps

Bronze
Posts: 269
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by Shrimps » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:16 am

zworykin wrote: Lurid:
1. vivid in shocking detail; sensational
Merriam-Webster's:
1 a : causing horror or revulsion : gruesome b : melodramatic, sensational; also : shocking <paperbacks in the usual lurid covers — T. R. Fyvel>
2 a : wan and ghastly pale in appearance b : of any of several light or medium grayish colors ranging in hue from yellow to orange
3 : shining with the red glow of fire seen through smoke or cloud

synonyms see ghastly

Calling something "lurid" is not really a compliment.

User avatar
zworykin

Bronze
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:18 am

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- Refractory Period

Post by zworykin » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:27 am

Melodramatic/sensational isn't necessarily a bad thing here. They're looking for ability to develop an argument and to write well--not necessarily for writing that would fit in a professional context ;)

akak179

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:56 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- Refractory Period

Post by akak179 » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:35 am

Country 1 easssssy, examine the facts...The only advantage country 2 had was that there was a larger chance of seeing the eclipse (Still not a garuntee!!)...Country 1 had...travel advantage (both in price and ease to get there along with flexibility of having a car over having to go by the "tour companys" itinerary..."Unrivaled cultural center" (which thankfully was not under the possibility of having the embassies within said cities taken over due to political unrest...and some members of the family had been there before, which can be interpreted to mean that they had such a pleasant time that they would debate returning there for a second time over visiting an unknown location...yeah city 1 allll day babayyyyy





for the record this was by far the part of the test that I feel most confident in....I most likely scored anywhere from 5-9 points lower than my average...so im fighting til the death for my writing sample :roll:

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Ragged

Silver
Posts: 1496
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- Refractory Period

Post by Ragged » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:37 am

Country 1 is #1 for a reason. Its better. Forget the politicly unstable country 2.

Shrimps

Bronze
Posts: 269
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- Refractory Period

Post by Shrimps » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:44 am

zworykin wrote:Melodramatic/sensational isn't necessarily a bad thing here. They're looking for ability to develop an argument and to write well--not necessarily for writing that would fit in a professional context ;)
I've heard that most essays go unread. Sigh. I think I was fairly lurid/lucid on mine. I'd rather have that section scored than the games.

User avatar
James Bond

Gold
Posts: 2344
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 12:53 am

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- Refractory Period

Post by James Bond » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:45 am

Country 2 is so AGP. Who wants to go to that dump?

User avatar
lebob

New
Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:25 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- Refractory Period

Post by lebob » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:53 am

lol, i chose country two (am i the only one?)

not because i was tryin to be maverick, but because i seriously thought i could write a better argument for it

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


pbmoore

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:16 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- Refractory Period

Post by pbmoore » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:54 am

Will post in-depth details about the ESSAY get us banned?

User avatar
CryingMonkey

Bronze
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 1:22 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by CryingMonkey » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:54 am

zworykin wrote:
CryingMonkey wrote:I hate to weigh in, but anyone repping country one clearly hasn't read my writing sample. If you had, you would definitely repent and come to where it's at. My logic was relentless, my prose lurid, my conclusions inescapable. Country two - it's like country one, only better in every way.
Plus when the guerillas finally finish overthrowing that weakass C2 government, that poor family will never even have another chance to visit!
This is the credited response.

User avatar
CryingMonkey

Bronze
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 1:22 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- KILL IT TODAY!!!!

Post by CryingMonkey » Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:00 am

Shrimps wrote:
zworykin wrote: Lurid:
1. vivid in shocking detail; sensational
Merriam-Webster's:
1 a : causing horror or revulsion : gruesome b : melodramatic, sensational; also : shocking <paperbacks in the usual lurid covers — T. R. Fyvel>
2 a : wan and ghastly pale in appearance b : of any of several light or medium grayish colors ranging in hue from yellow to orange
3 : shining with the red glow of fire seen through smoke or cloud

synonyms see ghastly

Calling something "lurid" is not really a compliment.
Also, just to state for the record, I did indeed mean to use "lurid" in its "sensational/melodramatic" sense. In fact, the essay was so lurid that it pretty much failed to be lucid.

User avatar
DaveBear07

Bronze
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:21 pm

Re: On Track for the June 2010 LSAT -- Refractory Period

Post by DaveBear07 » Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:07 am

Seriously? Country #2 was way better. Much better chance of actually seeing the event you are planning your vacation around. AND cost and convenience were in no way included in the criteria for determining which country to visit. Nor was safety for that matter.. haha.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Locked

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”