I'd take the Olympics over anything else. Olympics are the absolute best.Alexandros wrote:Only sport thing I consistently pay attention to is FIFA world cup. Once every four years suits me well.oopsu812 wrote:It's certainly losing its magic these days. The playacting and whining is completely out of control and is embarrassing to watch. I still love playing it, it was almost my whole life, but watching is it whatever now.dj9i27 wrote:Soccer is lameoopsu812 wrote:Lulz, that's how I picked my soccer team. Whatever would antagonise my family the most.Alexandros wrote:Traiter.dj9i27 wrote:srs alex? Blind allegiance to the motherland is appreciated I suppose.
(My approach to sports is just to cheer on whatever team is playing against the one the rest of the room is rooting for.)
The Official September 2017 Study Group Forum
- oopsu812

- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
- twiix

- Posts: 858
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 12:41 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Not URM - Normal white guy. I have been working in engineering firms for the last 2.5 years (will be 3.5 by next fall), so that helps. Softs aren't unique but I have a decently strong personal statement/gpa addenda. I've talked to Spivey's firm about it and will likely seek out their services to help as much as possible.dj9i27 wrote:T4 being Chi or Columbia? because columbia is in the realm of actuality. Seems like Penn is still good even if you have a 2.6, just make sure your app is air tight. Are you URM/have relevant WE or volunteering/Unique softs? There is talk about the 2.7/177 URM having a shot at Stanny.TWiiX wrote:
Being realistic.. T4 is out. I'm fine with it. My realistic reaches will likely be Penn/Duke/Mich with targets of NU/Cornell/Berkeley/UVA. Who knows though. I'm STEM, and going into IP.. I'll hopefully get patent bar registered before attending, so that might help the resume. Regardless, going into big law isn't impossible from a T20 if I do IP.. but I'm keeping my goals there.
edit: ill of course throw the yalemary and the stanmary (praise treegod) just for good measures. I have no issues with sucking ass. I'll give every school a Why X and it will be a damn convincing essay at that. I'll at least make them shed a tear before rejecting me.
- 34iplaw

- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
AFAIK, only people are CLS aficionados use the term T4.TWiiX wrote:Not URM - Normal white guy. I have been working in engineering firms for the last 2.5 years (will be 3.5 by next fall), so that helps. Softs aren't unique but I have a decently strong personal statement/gpa addenda. I've talked to Spivey's firm about it and will likely seek out their services to help as much as possible.dj9i27 wrote:T4 being Chi or Columbia? because columbia is in the realm of actuality. Seems like Penn is still good even if you have a 2.6, just make sure your app is air tight. Are you URM/have relevant WE or volunteering/Unique softs? There is talk about the 2.7/177 URM having a shot at Stanny.TWiiX wrote:
Being realistic.. T4 is out. I'm fine with it. My realistic reaches will likely be Penn/Duke/Mich with targets of NU/Cornell/Berkeley/UVA. Who knows though. I'm STEM, and going into IP.. I'll hopefully get patent bar registered before attending, so that might help the resume. Regardless, going into big law isn't impossible from a T20 if I do IP.. but I'm keeping my goals there.
edit: ill of course throw the yalemary and the stanmary (praise treegod) just for good measures. I have no issues with sucking ass. I'll give every school a Why X and it will be a damn convincing essay at that. I'll at least make them shed a tear before rejecting me.
CLS is probably possible with a sub 3.0 if it's near the 3.0. I know someone who got in with around a 3 and a super tight LSAT score, but he also had softs that schools would possibly find impressive. I imagine a 3.0//173 has a better shot than a 3.3//170 at CLS.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Splitters are so weird; I've seen 3.5/175 pull S but wonder if a 3.3/4 180 could pull it as well. I think a lot of softs come into play more so than with strong number applicants. With a kickass PS and GPA addendum I see him pulling CLS, whether or not any merit aid is given is to be determined I mean this happened http://lawschoolnumbers.com/kkdk.34iplaw wrote:AFAIK, only people are CLS aficionados use the term T4.TWiiX wrote:Not URM - Normal white guy. I have been working in engineering firms for the last 2.5 years (will be 3.5 by next fall), so that helps. Softs aren't unique but I have a decently strong personal statement/gpa addenda. I've talked to Spivey's firm about it and will likely seek out their services to help as much as possible.dj9i27 wrote:T4 being Chi or Columbia? because columbia is in the realm of actuality. Seems like Penn is still good even if you have a 2.6, just make sure your app is air tight. Are you URM/have relevant WE or volunteering/Unique softs? There is talk about the 2.7/177 URM having a shot at Stanny.TWiiX wrote:
Being realistic.. T4 is out. I'm fine with it. My realistic reaches will likely be Penn/Duke/Mich with targets of NU/Cornell/Berkeley/UVA. Who knows though. I'm STEM, and going into IP.. I'll hopefully get patent bar registered before attending, so that might help the resume. Regardless, going into big law isn't impossible from a T20 if I do IP.. but I'm keeping my goals there.
edit: ill of course throw the yalemary and the stanmary (praise treegod) just for good measures. I have no issues with sucking ass. I'll give every school a Why X and it will be a damn convincing essay at that. I'll at least make them shed a tear before rejecting me.
CLS is probably possible with a sub 3.0 if it's near the 3.0. I know someone who got in with around a 3 and a super tight LSAT score, but he also had softs that schools would possibly find impressive. I imagine a 3.0//173 has a better shot than a 3.3//170 at CLS.
HYS are weird in general, their lowest GPA for H and S has been low 3.X but I wonder what those folks did. No point in throwing all my coal into those trains.
- oopsu812

- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
That student loan payment thread will be a great thread to read through when making making the decision about where to go.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sun Apr 23, 2017 4:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Chi and them trade spots every now and again.Alexandros wrote:Since when is CLS #4?34iplaw wrote:AFAIK, only people are CLS aficionados use the term T4.TWiiX wrote:Not URM - Normal white guy. I have been working in engineering firms for the last 2.5 years (will be 3.5 by next fall), so that helps. Softs aren't unique but I have a decently strong personal statement/gpa addenda. I've talked to Spivey's firm about it and will likely seek out their services to help as much as possible.dj9i27 wrote:T4 being Chi or Columbia? because columbia is in the realm of actuality. Seems like Penn is still good even if you have a 2.6, just make sure your app is air tight. Are you URM/have relevant WE or volunteering/Unique softs? There is talk about the 2.7/177 URM having a shot at Stanny.TWiiX wrote:
Being realistic.. T4 is out. I'm fine with it. My realistic reaches will likely be Penn/Duke/Mich with targets of NU/Cornell/Berkeley/UVA. Who knows though. I'm STEM, and going into IP.. I'll hopefully get patent bar registered before attending, so that might help the resume. Regardless, going into big law isn't impossible from a T20 if I do IP.. but I'm keeping my goals there.
edit: ill of course throw the yalemary and the stanmary (praise treegod) just for good measures. I have no issues with sucking ass. I'll give every school a Why X and it will be a damn convincing essay at that. I'll at least make them shed a tear before rejecting me.
CLS is probably possible with a sub 3.0 if it's near the 3.0. I know someone who got in with around a 3 and a super tight LSAT score, but he also had softs that schools would possibly find impressive. I imagine a 3.0//173 has a better shot than a 3.3//170 at CLS.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Mormons knocked on my door while reading MH LR and I wasn't having it; just started to speak the 30 words of Arabic over and over again. I was complementing their shoes so much.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sun Apr 23, 2017 1:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
SLS is God, SLS is King. CLS is a false prophet.Alexandros wrote: I'm only kidding. I love CLS.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sun Apr 23, 2017 7:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- oopsu812

- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
You know, it's sad to say, but I find this is a great way to get anyone to go away.dj9i27 wrote:Mormons knocked on my door while reading MH LR and I wasn't having it; just started to speak the 30 words of Arabic over and over again. I was complementing their shoes so much.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Just stood there silent until they introduced themselves and said, "My name is X" in Arabic, they looked at me weird and when they started to talk about Joseph Smith I just went off on tangents. They left after like a minute and confused since neon whitey was claiming he didn't know English.Alexandros wrote:Oh no. What did you do?dj9i27 wrote:Mormons knocked on my door while reading MH LR and I wasn't having it; just started to speak the 30 words of Arabic over and over again. I was complementing their shoes so much.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
My Iranian born friend is the only one in my circle who knows it; everyone else speaks spanish, french, german or engilish in my group so Arabic is typically my go tooopsu812 wrote:You know, it's sad to say, but I find this is a great way to get anyone to go away.dj9i27 wrote:Mormons knocked on my door while reading MH LR and I wasn't having it; just started to speak the 30 words of Arabic over and over again. I was complementing their shoes so much.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sun Apr 23, 2017 7:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- abujabal

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:32 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
checking in as actually taking September testAlexandros wrote:You're the only one left now, dude.dj9i27 wrote:suh dudeAlexandros wrote:Right choice, imo.oopsu812 wrote:Sorry, I'm not taking the LSAT this September. It just doesn't make much sense when I still have 2 years of UG left, and want to get a Masters and WE before LS.dj9i27 wrote:y u no take lsatoopsu812 wrote:Wow, going from drinking multiple times a week, to not once in 4 months really screws with your tolerance. Yikes.
I'm going to crack open the LR book tomorrow. I'm not taking the LSAT anymore, but it can't hurt to familiarise myself with some of the logic. I'd love to get comfortable with necessary and sufficient assumptions ASAP.
did Stanny say something to you?
... although the amount of people ITT actually taking in Sept 2017 is growing slim....
This thread should be renamed "DJ's personal LSAT study thread."
- Rupert Pupkin

- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
CLS is #1 !!! <3333Alexandros wrote:I'm only kidding. I love CLS.dj9i27 wrote:Chi and them trade spots every now and again.Alexandros wrote:Since when is CLS #4?34iplaw wrote:AFAIK, only people are CLS aficionados use the term T4.TWiiX wrote:Not URM - Normal white guy. I have been working in engineering firms for the last 2.5 years (will be 3.5 by next fall), so that helps. Softs aren't unique but I have a decently strong personal statement/gpa addenda. I've talked to Spivey's firm about it and will likely seek out their services to help as much as possible.dj9i27 wrote:T4 being Chi or Columbia? because columbia is in the realm of actuality. Seems like Penn is still good even if you have a 2.6, just make sure your app is air tight. Are you URM/have relevant WE or volunteering/Unique softs? There is talk about the 2.7/177 URM having a shot at Stanny.TWiiX wrote:
Being realistic.. T4 is out. I'm fine with it. My realistic reaches will likely be Penn/Duke/Mich with targets of NU/Cornell/Berkeley/UVA. Who knows though. I'm STEM, and going into IP.. I'll hopefully get patent bar registered before attending, so that might help the resume. Regardless, going into big law isn't impossible from a T20 if I do IP.. but I'm keeping my goals there.
edit: ill of course throw the yalemary and the stanmary (praise treegod) just for good measures. I have no issues with sucking ass. I'll give every school a Why X and it will be a damn convincing essay at that. I'll at least make them shed a tear before rejecting me.
CLS is probably possible with a sub 3.0 if it's near the 3.0. I know someone who got in with around a 3 and a super tight LSAT score, but he also had softs that schools would possibly find impressive. I imagine a 3.0//173 has a better shot than a 3.3//170 at CLS.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
SLS is God, I will fight for them if they accept me.jagerbom79 wrote:
CLS is #1 !!! <3333
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sun Apr 23, 2017 4:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I'm not getting in but I will be the most loyal student ever if I do. They have gone down to a 3.0 GPA before, so there is hope.Alexandros wrote:SLS definitely drugged DJ.
- oopsu812

- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
He speaks Arabic and not Persian/Farsi? Interesting.dj9i27 wrote:My Iranian born friend is the only one in my circle who knows it; everyone else speaks spanish, french, german or engilish in my group so Arabic is typically my go tooopsu812 wrote:You know, it's sad to say, but I find this is a great way to get anyone to go away.dj9i27 wrote:Mormons knocked on my door while reading MH LR and I wasn't having it; just started to speak the 30 words of Arabic over and over again. I was complementing their shoes so much.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
ugh, gotta get back on the LSAT grind pretty soon.. I just got off of my LSAT break a few days ago and took another break right after that day. September needs to hurry up, I want to get this shit done with
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sun Apr 23, 2017 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
dj9i27

- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by dj9i27 on Sun Apr 23, 2017 1:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Alexandros

- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sun Apr 23, 2017 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
