real The Official December 2016 Waiters Group - Patience is a Virtue Forum

[SunDevil14]

Brewpubs are stupid, and basically immoral. Are you eating or are you drinking? Decide. If I want a beer with dinner, I have MGD in the fridge and a frozen pizza, thanks.
You need to recognize the inherent superiority of a wholesome union between bar and taco truck, just as God intended

Poor Tony is gonna be slaving away in a kitchen making mediocre burgers for the local drunks when he could be chasing his dream of spreading glorious beers across the region.

+180

Laughed way too hard at this #TEAMBREWERY

#TEAMPUB.

Tony names the place "JuuGs". Skimpily dressed waitresses pay their way through college by serving Tony's beer in a signature Jug rather than a pitcher.

1.The waitresses are happy because of the Pay.
2. The Drunks are happy for the abundance of booze and boobs
3. Tony is happy because he enjoys fancical success along with the benefits that come from being surrounded by attractive young women that are desperate for attention and the cash Tony now has.

Everybody Wins. The idea sells itself.

[bearedman8]

The only LR question that had me stumped was about students waking up early. Don't remember figs or cat food.

I'm with you on that. From this thread, the only question that I remember that I'm not more than 90% on was teenage driving accidents.

https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=13007

[180orDie]

It blows my mind that there are people quick enough on their feet to figure out a game like game 4 on the fly. I guess that's what separates the men (YHS) from the boys.

[#gobroncos]

#miradoblackwarrior

You're after my own heart. Best writing experience, though the Ticonderoga has the best erasure for sure.

[zot1]

I'll take some ketchup. Thanks!

[alpha kenny body]

This BIG 10 Championship game is getting out of hand, and will be just as entertaining in the second half.

[batlaw]

It blows my mind that there are people quick enough on their feet to figure out a game like game 4 on the fly. I guess that's what separates the men (YHS) from the boys.

And the ever elusive non-men, non-boys who could figure it out lol.

[nimbus cloud]

.

[SunDevil14]

It blows my mind that there are people quick enough on their feet to figure out a game like game 4 on the fly. I guess that's what separates the men (YHS) from the boys.

Don't trip 180orDie, we all worked hard. It's not like we had any game similar to Game 4 that would could have studied and reviewed. We all left no stone unturned, and it just so happened that the test makers got sadistic and threw a giant boulder onto the pile.

What separates the men from the boys is that men work as hard as they can and give it all they can, not the school or any talents/apptitudes. As far as I am concerned all the usual posters on our study group are men despite the eventual outcome.

Forgive the sentimentality guys, still haven't gotten over that fact that it's finally over.

[Instrumental]

It blows my mind that there are people quick enough on their feet to figure out a game like game 4 on the fly. I guess that's what separates the men (YHS) from the boys.

tbh, I think it's more an issue of time than anything. Conceptually it didn't seem too bizarre, just not much can be inferred after drawing out the game and rules. I think I had 6 minutes going into it so I was really rushing and not fully checking my answers like the other games.

[Instrumental]

As far as I am concerned all the usual posters on our study group are men despite the eventual outcome.

Enjoy your sex change ladies. Peeing standing up is boss innit?

[SunDevil14]

As far as I am concerned all the usual posters on our study group are men despite the eventual outcome.

Enjoy your sex change ladies. Peeing standing up is boss innit?

Haha.
A.The poster pees standing up
B. The flaw in the question is that the poster overlooks the possibility of both sexes

[#gobroncos]

It blows my mind that there are people quick enough on their feet to figure out a game like game 4 on the fly. I guess that's what separates the men (YHS) from the boys.

I empathize with this. When I took the test last December, I remember all these folks saying, "Game 3 was actually really easy guys!" and I wanted to scream. But that experience had me prepped for a really weird one this time around.

Also, after mentally preparing myself to have missed all five questions on that game, I only missed two in the entire section. So you never know. You might've done better than you think.

[dj9i27]

.

[dontsaywhatyoumean]

I remember until the 60's or so I was able to complete almost all the LG questions (by my standards, like -3 or so).

People said the games were getting EASIER lol. Maybe they were. They certainly don't feel easier now though. I would totally rather take the older games.

Anyway, I went a little over 50% on this games section, but RC and LR I often get almost everything right, and this one felt easier than usual, so hopefully that will carry me to my score.

[gwillygecko]

after bombing in september(and canceling my score..) i am so relieved that the lsat is now over for me!!

congrats to everyone who took it today and isnt planning on taking it again ever.

my impressions:

lr was pretty straight forward. there seems to be a recent trend to questions involving two speakers and that continues.

lg3 was a time sink, but once i figured out the "key inference" it was easier.

lg4 looked confusing at first, but unlike the virus game, which i only had 4-5 mins to do, i had a "full" 8:45 for this bad boy, and even had enough to check over/verify my answers. once i "got going" on it things were fine.

rc seemed pretty straight forward, i was thrilled that the comp. passage was about insider trading, i felt like i was reading a magazine article, ha. the last passage was the hardest read, but the questions did not seem too bad all things considered.

i dont know what the curve will be, but hope i didnt miss more than 6 or 7. fingers crossed!

good luck and best wishes to my fellow test takers.

[calpolisci2016]

December waiters thread oddly quiet compared to the September thread. What gives?

[Pozzo]

December waiters thread oddly quiet compared to the September thread. What gives?

That's what, to name just 3.

[Pozzo]

after bombing in september(and canceling my score..) i am so relieved that the lsat is now over for me!!

congrats to everyone who took it today and isnt planning on taking it again ever.

my impressions:

lr was pretty straight forward. there seems to be a recent trend to questions involving two speakers and that continues.

lg3 was a time sink, but once i figured out the "key inference" it was easier.

lg4 looked confusing at first, but unlike the virus game, which i only had 4-5 mins to do, i had a "full" 8:45 for this bad boy, and even had enough to check over/verify my answers. once i "got going" on it things were fine.

rc seemed pretty straight forward, i was thrilled that the comp. passage was about insider trading, i felt like i was reading a magazine article, ha. the last passage was the hardest read, but the questions did not seem too bad all things considered.

i dont know what the curve will be, but hope i didnt miss more than 6 or 7. fingers crossed!

good luck and best wishes to my fellow test takers.

Awesome time management on games to leave yourself close to 9 for game 4. Games 2 and 3 could sink a lot of time if we weren't careful. (Spoiler: I wasn't.)

[emkay625]

Came in here to say good luck to all and to tell you all that you better be drinking tonight. Then I saw that yall are already on page 117. Well done.

[bearedman8]

.

[gwillygecko]

after bombing in september(and canceling my score..) i am so relieved that the lsat is now over for me!!

congrats to everyone who took it today and isnt planning on taking it again ever.

my impressions:

lr was pretty straight forward. there seems to be a recent trend to questions involving two speakers and that continues.

lg3 was a time sink, but once i figured out the "key inference" it was easier.

lg4 looked confusing at first, but unlike the virus game, which i only had 4-5 mins to do, i had a "full" 8:45 for this bad boy, and even had enough to check over/verify my answers. once i "got going" on it things were fine.

rc seemed pretty straight forward, i was thrilled that the comp. passage was about insider trading, i felt like i was reading a magazine article, ha. the last passage was the hardest read, but the questions did not seem too bad all things considered.

i dont know what the curve will be, but hope i didnt miss more than 6 or 7. fingers crossed!

good luck and best wishes to my fellow test takers.

Awesome time management on games to leave yourself close to 9 for game 4. Games 2 and 3 could sink a lot of time if we weren't careful. (Spoiler: I wasn't.)

I really breezed through game 1 and that helped a lot. Also Ive gotten pretty good at games similar to the 2nd. 3 took me some time.

[dj9i27]

.

[Pozzo]

How do you think you did Pozzo? I know that games didn't go as well as you'd have liked.

LR and RC were really smooth for me. It's going to come down to games. If I was able to eek out those last two games despite my timing challenges, my bet is 175+. Otherwise, I'm guessing low 170s.

How about you?

[bearedman8]

.