lol. What are your normal pt scores?TheProdigal wrote:PT57 in the bag.
LG -1
LR1 -2
LR2 -2
RC -2
174.![]()
I've never even BRed that high.
I blind review really high, (my last blind review test was 176) but then I got a 161 on that test.
lol. What are your normal pt scores?TheProdigal wrote:PT57 in the bag.
LG -1
LR1 -2
LR2 -2
RC -2
174.![]()
I've never even BRed that high.
It's 57. I rather enjoyed that one. Anything but dense legalese -- which makes me question many things about this entire process.flash21 wrote:I did a reading comp passage about geometric fractals today.. it was so horrible. I think it was a section of a PT in the 50's .
This was my first PT of this prep cycle. Last time I was almost only at 170 (BR as high as 172), previous time averaged 167 (no BR).flash21 wrote:lol. What are your normal pt scores?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Don't think ill be able to cheaply find one in time.somethingelse55 wrote:@nlee - Have you done Feb 1997 as well? That's probably the rarest PT.
@RZ - I hear you on that one. I'm planning on getting up at 5, I like to be awake for a solid couple of hours before taking an exam. Its been tough trying to fall asleep so early though, but I'm slowly getting used to it.
I always sleep by 11pm and am up by 6:30am so I'm used to it.RZ5646 wrote:How early do you guys plan on waking up? I've been having a lot of trouble trying to change my sleep schedule.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I'm confused at your separation for reading and analysis? Could you explain a bit?appind wrote:just got done drilling pt-33 RC doing each passage one at a time to improve rc in this last stretch.
i've been trying taking more time reading the passage to be very clear about its idea before moving to questions.
P1: initial read 2:43, analyze 3:15, bubble done 7:20: -0/7
P2: initial read 4:45, analyze 5:24, bubble done 9:33: -0/7
P3: initial read 3:45, analyze 4:20, bubble done 9:35: -0/8
P4: initial read 4:58, analyze 5:25, bubble done 8:31: -1/6
-1/28 in 34:59 min
the numbers next to stages are the time marks when i am done with that stage for the passage.
i think i am probably taking too long on the initial read and analysis of the passage, and this may not translate well to 60s/70s RC.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
as i read the passage, while i'm trying to notice the structure and main point, i find that at the end of the initial read they're sometimes still a bit fluid.sanibella wrote:I'm confused at your separation for reading and analysis? Could you explain a bit?appind wrote:just got done drilling pt-33 RC doing each passage one at a time to improve rc in this last stretch.
i've been trying taking more time reading the passage to be very clear about its idea before moving to questions.
P1: initial read 2:43, analyze 3:15, bubble done 7:20: -0/7
P2: initial read 4:45, analyze 5:24, bubble done 9:33: -0/7
P3: initial read 3:45, analyze 4:20, bubble done 9:35: -0/8
P4: initial read 4:58, analyze 5:25, bubble done 8:31: -1/6
-1/28 in 34:59 min
the numbers next to stages are the time marks when i am done with that stage for the passage.
i think i am probably taking too long on the initial read and analysis of the passage, and this may not translate well to 60s/70s RC.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login