The Official October Waiter's Oasis Forum

sanibella · Post by **sanibella** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:25 pm

RZ5646 wrote:
ChillTomG wrote:
RZ5646 wrote:
ChillTomG wrote:I found LG to be much harder than that of a typical LSAT. Maybe I was missing something here, but I usually finish the LG section with 5-10 minutes to spare, both in PTs and for real in June. I finished this LG section with only two minutes to spare, then went back and realized that I missed a rules question. I would be very surprised if I missed any questions, but it felt much harder than usual.

The biggest surprise was RC. I thought it was surprisingly easy. Usually, I am seriously cramped for time and rushing during my PTs, barely finishing before the buzzer is called. The same thing happened during the June test. Here, I blew through the Schoenberg passage in 6 minutes, and finished with a few minutes to spare, without rushing. I usually miss 3 or 4 questions on RC (three on the June test). I would be very surprised if I missed more than two questions on this test. I am guessing one miss, and would not be surprised if I scored perfectly.

The LR sections were both about average I thought, neither seemed easier than the other. I didn't have as much time as I would have like to check answers on either section. I am expecting a total of -2/-3 from both sections combined.

Overall, I am predicting -3 or -4 for the test. With the worst curve in history, and a -4, that puts me at a 175, but I think that this test was overall average-hard, putting me at a 177-179. I hope my predictions are right!

I am also completely convinced that LR#2, question #24 did not have a valid answer. It was necessary assumption question. I don't know how in detail I can go about the question and answer choices, but I think I am going to throw the challenge flag at LSAC.
What was the topic of that question? Try to get us to remember it without breaking the rules
The question was about introductory science courses being "proving" courses
Hmmm I think that question was okay. Idk how to explain it in a TLS-friendly way though and I don't want to get banned.

+1

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:26 pm

Post removed...

whacka · Post by **whacka** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:27 pm

Post removed.

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:27 pm

Post removed.

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:27 pm

Post removed.

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:28 pm

Post removed...

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:28 pm

gamerish wrote:Ok so anyone else think -8 curve

all those in favor of banning this ridiculous kind of speech ITT say I

nlee10 · Post by **nlee10** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:29 pm

theugg wrote:
whacka wrote:Just wanted to drop this link here so you all can be neurotic about the application process with us in addition to being neurotic about LSAT scores:

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=252258
Dude. Give us a few days!!!

We need a few days away from the process to recover.

chalky · Post by **chalky** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:29 pm

Post removed...

TheWalkingDebt · Post by **TheWalkingDebt** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:29 pm

I think probably -11.

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:30 pm

Post removed.

chalky · Post by **chalky** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:30 pm

Post removed...

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:31 pm

Post removed...

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:31 pm

Post removed.

The Abyss · Post by **The Abyss** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:32 pm

gamerish wrote:
TheWalkingDebt wrote:I think probably -11.
I hope to god. I doubt I did so well that I could still hit 170 on a -8 just because that's completely unprecedented in my PT'ing but I've never felt so good about a test before.

I'm also pretty drunk right now so sorry if I offended anyone.

Drunk and really confident here too.

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:32 pm

Post removed.

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:32 pm

Post removed...

EnderWiggin · Post by **EnderWiggin** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:32 pm

gamerish wrote:
TheWalkingDebt wrote:I think probably -11.
I hope to god. I doubt I did so well that I could still hit 170 on a -8 just because that's completely unprecedented in my PT'ing but I've never felt so good about a test before, not even my best PT.

I'm also pretty drunk right now so sorry if I offended anyone.

not offended, just hope you're wrong!

cub1014 · Post by **cub1014** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:33 pm

mod edit: too much info

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:33 pm

Post removed...

sorry4lurking · Post by **sorry4lurking** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:34 pm

gamerish · Post by **gamerish** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:34 pm

Post removed...

chalky · Post by **chalky** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:34 pm

Post removed...

ugg · Post by **ugg** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:35 pm

Post removed.

chalky · Post by **chalky** » Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:35 pm

Post removed...

The Official October Waiter's Oasis Forum

What did you score?

Re: The Official October Waiter's Oasis

Post removed...

Post removed.

Post removed.

Post removed.

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Post removed...

Re: The Official October Waiter's Oasis

Re: The Official October Waiter's Oasis

Post removed...

Register for access!

Re: The Official October Waiter's Oasis

Post removed.

Post removed...

Post removed...

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Post removed.

Re: The Official October Waiter's Oasis

Post removed.

Post removed...

Register now!

Re: The Official October Waiter's Oasis

Re: The Official October Waiter's Oasis

Post removed...

Re: The Official October Waiter's Oasis

Register now, it's still FREE!

Post removed...

Post removed...

Post removed.

Post removed...

Seriously? What are you waiting for?