real The Official December 2016 Waiters Group - Patience is a Virtue Forum

[VMars]

For those retaking, how was this compared to September? Any weird games or terrible passages?

I found Sept LG super doable + RC brutal, opposite this time around. A lot of people hated viruses though obv which I didn't find too bad.

[34iplaw]

For those retaking, how was this compared to September? Any weird games or terrible passages?

Fourth game was really bizarre. Far weirder than Virus IMO but not as hard.

Third game was hard barring what I assume was a valid inference.

RC I felt was really easy. one LR I felt was really hard. Other was average.

[Capt_Beatty]

For those retaking, how was this compared to September? Any weird games or terrible passages?

I had LR RC LR LG LR, which was the exact setup at September. I think the December LG as a whole was more difficult, games 3 and 4. For some reason the first passage of RC tripped me up. LR was nothing ordinary but that last section, I was just burnt out. Pretty bummed right, I don't think I beat my Sept score

[VMars]

Hey, guys. I had two RC. I did pretty poorly on the first one. I remember the first passage was about a person's theory against utilitarian theory, and something about the veil of ignorance. was that the real one?


Thanks in advance

Looks like that one was real. Sorry it's not the answer you were hoping for

[Greenteachurro]

Okay post game synopsis LG by far one of the hardest ever but game 4 wasn't so bad after taking a pause, 3rd game felt harder but I think there were 2 biggish inferences that made it doable. RC probably the easiest in recent times, first 1 easy 1 average LR

[Lahtso Nuggin]

Checking in. i hope I don't have to do that again.

[34iplaw]

brolo

[CHyde]

.

[simplypara588]

Anyone remember if small businesses was real for LR? I thought this was tougher than September. Brain scans was a killer for me

[theboringest]

Did anyone have a parallel flaw question where it was about studying history, and having a characteristic if you did? Real or not real? That one fucked me good.

[34iplaw]

Anyone remember if small businesses was real for LR? I thought this was tougher than September. Brain scans was a killer for me

Small businesses sounds familiar, but it seems somewhat vague enough to be a pretty often recurring topic on LSATs.

[Mikey]

Sooooo guys, how did it go?!?!?

[34iplaw]

Yolo

[VMars]

Did anyone have a parallel flaw question where it was about studying history, and having a characteristic if you did? Real or not real? That one fucked me good.

Pretty sure real

[CHyde]

.

[theboringest]

Ok so my post test feelings (I had LR RC LR break LG LR, which was basically a perfect order/setup for me):

LR1- 25 questions. Average difficulty? I didn't notice it being super hard, but I did take a bit longer than normal. Maybe a lot of medium difficulty questions without many super tough ones.

RC- 27 questions. Holy shit based RC thank you. I honestly thought passage 1 (utilitarian) was the hardest. The last question for that threw me. But still not a tough passage. The middle two passages were a gift from the LSAT gods. Passage 4 (brains) was dense but pretty clearly structured and I had lots of time, so...yeah. RC is going to bring the curve down. Calling it.

LR 2- 25 questions. Same as LR1 really. There were two really difficult questions and one parallel flaw question where I honestly think they fucked up and didn't mean parallel flaw- there was not flaw I could find in a super straightforward inference chain...

LG- 23 questions. Hahahahaha fuck you LSAC first time in like 20 years we get back to back tests with weird games and I get them, go fuck yourselves. Game 1- easy. MOD EDIT: DON'T DESCRIBE WHAT KINDS OF GAMES THEY WERE

LR3- 26 questions. Harder than average. Did not like. Fuck cats and their food.

Overall I'd say it was on par with September in difficulty, but in different ways- September had a super tough RC, this had easy, September had easier LR, this one was tougher. I'm calling a -11 curve based on not hard RC and the fourth game being only 5 questions.

[CHyde]

.

[wedidit1991]

Oh boy... had two LGs and the real one was the one I got screwed over on. One of the LRs seemed way harder than the other. Definitely not in a good place after finding out the real LG.

[theboringest]

Fuck cats and their food.

This is some truth. I narrowed it to two and I think both called for some extra assumptions.

Same. I did not like either answer and picked based on which one required less jumping by me.

[Mikey]

how'd it go for you bro?

[VMars]

Anyone remember how many qs LG 3 had? 4th game was 5 I think?

[34iplaw]

Anyone remember how many qs LG 3 had? 4th game was 5 I think?

3rd was long IIRC. I got the game but it still took some time to trudge through.

[34iplaw]

how'd it go for you bro?

I'm fairly convinced I got -0 on LG.
I felt good about RC and wouldn't be shocked for my current trend of -1 to -2 on RC.

One LR I'd be shocked at over -2. Other I could see up to -4. Pretty confident in cracking 170 this time, but the curve could be less friendly. Depends how people did on game 3 and game 4.

[connordalto]

I had RC lr RC lr lg... thought the exp RC sec was brutal but I finished both in time and was able to check... thought lr2 was hard af, dunno about that one. Cats food I think I biffed. Lg is a crapshoot.. I figured out the buildings but was super rushed, fuck that painting game took me 15 min+.

Sooo curve... maybe -12??

And production facilities ftwww

Time for a beer.

[theboringest]

Production facility plebs can fuck right off, pub all the way.