The Official June 2015 Study Group Forum

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:36 am

JackelJ wrote:You missed mine and Shak's which is very unfortunate

Is IRL Shak as creepy as her avatar?

Rigo · Post by **Rigo** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:37 am

RZ5646 wrote:
JackelJ wrote:You missed mine and Shak's which is very unfortunate
Is IRL Shak as creepy as her avatar?

No.

Rhymes With Wolf · Post by **Rhymes With Wolf** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:38 am

RZ5646 wrote:Is IRL Shak as creepy as her avatar?

Go watch Amélie right now, sir!

ChoboPie · Post by **ChoboPie** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:38 am

RZ5646 wrote:I'd PW but I'm too ugly. Sorry.

DON'T DODGE. DODGING = 120. PW = 180.

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:40 am

Guys think about how much study time we just wasted on here

TheWalkingDebt · Post by **TheWalkingDebt** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:40 am

ChoboPie wrote:
RZ5646 wrote:I'd PW but I'm too ugly. Sorry.
DON'T DODGE. DODGING = 120. PW = 180.

We're linking up conditional logic chains here.

RZ PW --> Chobo PW --> others pw (I forget who else).

ChoboPie · Post by **ChoboPie** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:41 am

RZ5646 wrote:Guys think about how much study time we just wasted on here

Only wasted because we didn't have more PWs

ETA2: @ TWD, so far it's: RZ --> Chobo --> nlee --> McJim -->

betterLawyerUP · Post by **betterLawyerUP** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:41 am

RZ5646 wrote:
betterLawyerUP wrote:
Don't worry I'm just going to assume you're a spitting image of Leo.
your assumption is flawed, need to brush up on your LR there ~~pal~~ old sport
You missed a great opportunity there Leo Gatsby.

WOW i hate myself, trying to force LSAT terms in my daily life/forums has blinded me of thinking outside the box.

McJimJam · Post by **McJimJam** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:44 am

Post removed.

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:46 am

If I'm the sufficient condition it doesn't matter. I can not PW and you guys can still do whatever you want.

So get going. PWs. Now.

ETA: See, we really are studying here after all haha

JackelJ · Post by **JackelJ** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:51 am

I'm disappointed ITT. Shak had too much confidence in comparing it to Sept
I'm off to bed, nighty night

TheWalkingDebt · Post by **TheWalkingDebt** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:51 am

The next poll should be if you're a bad OP or the worst OP.

RZ5646 · Post by **RZ5646** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:54 am

TheWalkingDebt wrote:The next poll should be if you're a bad OP or the worst OP.

Normally I hate reaction gifs but in this case one is justified.

McJimJam · Post by **McJimJam** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 2:01 am

Post removed.

TheProdigal · Post by **TheProdigal** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 5:44 am

I chose the wrong night to go to bed early.

Smallville · Post by **Smallville** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:18 am

ChoboPie wrote:
nlee10 wrote:
ChoboPie wrote:
JackelJ wrote:when are we getting a Chobo PW?
and I see you lurking nlee, your pws are always cute
I'll pw if RZ pw's. I'll even add a sloth pillow and sloth poster.
I'll pw if Chobo pw's.
YES! We need to grow the chain--smallville, gamerish, dirigo, zacboro, pepper, anyone who's lurking, anyone who's ever shitpoasted here, let's do dis.

wasn't lurking... was sleeping

TheProdigal wrote:I chose the wrong night to go to bed early.

this.... missed all the PWs :/ sad stuff

JackelJ · Post by **JackelJ** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:26 am

Smallville wrote:
TheProdigal wrote:I chose the wrong night to go to bed early.
this.... missed all the PWs :/ sad stuff

No, you made a good call to go to bed early, I wish I had. You've already seen me and Shak so you only missed a mid-shave one of TWD

To OP: We don't hate you so don't quit this thread. I'm just sad that I failed at peer pressuring you to pw

biggestlawman · Post by **biggestlawman** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:25 am

nlee10 wrote:
biggestlawman wrote:Some people have found the Trainer to be useless, and they swear by the MLSAT books for all three section types. But given the rave reviews overall, I will do the Trainer. My impression is that anyone with a score below 170 can learn something from the Trainer.

Trainer: Next 10 days.
MLSAT LG: Days 11 to 25
MLSAT LR: Days 11 to 40
MLSAT RC: Days 11 to 40

This accompanied by PT 51-60, and Cambridge Bundles for the next 40 days.

Then, with 8 weeks to go, more drill baby drill, and 6-section PTs.

Hopefully this plan (mutatis mutandis) works! Any suggestions?
I'd be a bit weary to use up 10 PT's after going through the lesson books. Maybe do 2-3 PT's and then hone in on your weaknesses by drilling Cambridge?

See your point. Thanks!

biggestlawman · Post by **biggestlawman** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:27 am

Smallville wrote:
nlee10 wrote:
biggestlawman wrote:Some people have found the Trainer to be useless, and they swear by the MLSAT books for all three section types. But given the rave reviews overall, I will do the Trainer. My impression is that anyone with a score below 170 can learn something from the Trainer.

Trainer: Next 10 days.
MLSAT LG: Days 11 to 25
MLSAT LR: Days 11 to 40
MLSAT RC: Days 11 to 40

This accompanied by PT 51-60, and Cambridge Bundles for the next 40 days.

Then, with 8 weeks to go, more drill baby drill, and 6-section PTs.

Hopefully this plan (mutatis mutandis) works! Any suggestions?
I'd be a bit weary to use up 10 PT's after going through the lesson books. Maybe do 2-3 PT's and then hone in on your weaknesses by drilling Cambridge?

+1... maybe, what is your current score range?

I do not know my current score range. I have not touched LSAT stuff in months. I got 164 last June.

biggestlawman · Post by **biggestlawman** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:30 am

JackelJ wrote:
biggestlawman wrote:Also, why is everyone dissing the Trainer all of a sudden, right when I have decided to plunge into it?
who is dissing the Trainer? Its a good book, dive in

I see a lot of posts saying that the Trainer was useless, that it was very basic, etc. Is there a need to do the Trainer when I plan on doing the MLSAT books? I just want to make sure that I am not wasting my time.

chaipancakes · Post by **chaipancakes** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:37 am

Ugh I just can't motivate myself to start studying again. I know it's not, but June feels soooo far away.

sfoglia · Post by **sfoglia** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:41 am

biggestlawman wrote:
JackelJ wrote:
biggestlawman wrote:Also, why is everyone dissing the Trainer all of a sudden, right when I have decided to plunge into it?
who is dissing the Trainer? Its a good book, dive in
I see a lot of posts saying that the Trainer was useless, that it was very basic, etc. Is there a need to do the Trainer when I plan on doing the MLSAT books? I just want to make sure that I am not wasting my time.

WHAT? Trainer is the best book, IMO. I studied Education. It may SEEM basic, because it is scaffolded. But that's what good teaching does; it makes it easy to learn.

I'd take the Trainer over MLSAT any day. I read it twice.

sfoglia · Post by **sfoglia** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:42 am

chaipancakes wrote:Ugh I just can't motivate myself to start studying again. I know it's not, but June feels soooo far away.

LG, my friend. L frickin' G. Thirty-five minutes and you're done.

santoki · Post by **santoki** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:50 am

Post removed.

chaipancakes · Post by **chaipancakes** » Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:56 am

sfoglia wrote:
chaipancakes wrote:Ugh I just can't motivate myself to start studying again. I know it's not, but June feels soooo far away.
LG, my friend. L frickin' G. Thirty-five minutes and you're done.

Okok, yes, motivation. Today's the day I get back to it. Adios again, social life.