February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!) Forum

[Fyo'Couch]

I'm bad luck.

Dec 2010 - tied longest wait ever.

Dec 2011- crushed the record for longest wait ever.

Feb 2012 - closest to projected date in recent history.

Had those three as well. For fucks sakes.

[maxmartin]

how hard it could be if curve is pre-determined? This only makes me think the curve probably is not entirely pre-determined.

[Jsa725]

.

[odoylerulez]

Yeah, I'm giving up at this point. LSAC will be receiving a nasty e-mail from me. I'm tired of organizing my schedule around theoretical release dates because they are too incompetent to actually set a solid one.

I'm not even really convinced scores will be here by Wednesday if something really got messed up.

[Skunky Bumps]

Yeah, I'm giving up at this point. LSAC will be receiving a nasty e-mail from me. Tired of organizing my schedule around theoretical release dates because they are too incompetent to actually set a solid one.

I'm not even really convinced scores will be here by Wednesday if something really got messed up.

Oh christ, I don't even want to imagine that.

[ross1004]

Yeah, I'm giving up at this point. LSAC will be receiving a nasty e-mail from me. I'm tired of organizing my schedule around theoretical release dates because they are too incompetent to actually set a solid one.

I'm not even really convinced scores will be here by Wednesday if something really got messed up.

+1

[lnoy]

[Clearly]

Yeah, this is pretty disappointing, I was thinking Friday, after that didn't work out I thought it would be today for sure. Pretty bummed, I actually spent the day studying for June. Def got rusty with logic games, it was rough.

[LargeNinCharge]

Deleted.

[senhorquick]

WELP..... Mass Effect 3 releases at midnight. At least I'll be able to take on the reaper invasion while I wait longer.

Amen sistah.

But, why is everyone acting like because the scores were released today that we will have to wait until Wednesday? Is there some strange reason that would prevent scores from being released tomorrow? Or are people just being melodramatic?

[ross1004]

Whoever is LSACtrollop and LSACsilverfox is awesome.

Whoever is @Official_LSAT is not.

[roflmaozedong]

I'm also waiting to hear back from a summer internship that I really want. They told me end of February initially then moved it back to sometime early this week. Knowing me, I'll probably get both pieces of news on the same day, get rejected and score 10 points below my PT average.

[Clearly]

Wow wow wow is anyone else's page doing anything crazy with PDF logos at the bottom?

[Fad]

Yeah, I'm giving up at this point. LSAC will be receiving a nasty e-mail from me. I'm tired of organizing my schedule around theoretical release dates because they are too incompetent to actually set a solid one.

I'm not even really convinced scores will be here by Wednesday if something really got messed up.

LSAC never stated or implied that the release date was theoretical. If you want to look at charts of previous releases and assume that means this release date is not "solid," that's your own fault. I don't see how they've done anything wrong by not releasing it early, as it was never guaranteed. Incompetent would be releasing it after the stated release date. All a nasty email will do is give them a reason to not release them early at all.

[barrotmartin]

Wow wow wow is anyone else's page doing anything crazy with PDF logos at the bottom?

screenshot.

[foosbol21]

Wow wow wow is anyone else's page doing anything crazy with PDF logos at the bottom?

Just the page loading slowly. Did the same thing on Friday for me.

[Jsa725]

.

[pgmeister]

Wow wow wow is anyone else's page doing anything crazy with PDF logos at the bottom?

stop trolling

[barrotmartin]

Yeah, I'm giving up at this point. LSAC will be receiving a nasty e-mail from me. I'm tired of organizing my schedule around theoretical release dates because they are too incompetent to actually set a solid one.

I'm not even really convinced scores will be here by Wednesday if something really got messed up.

LSAC never stated or implied that the release date was theoretical. If you want to look at charts of previous releases and assume that means this release date is not "solid," that's your own fault. I don't see how they've done anything wrong by not releasing it early, as it was never guaranteed. Incompetent would be releasing it after the stated release date. All a nasty email will do is give them a reason to not release them early at all.

Nah. LSAC would continue to not care what you think, nasty email or no.

[odoylerulez]

Yeah, I'm giving up at this point. LSAC will be receiving a nasty e-mail from me. I'm tired of organizing my schedule around theoretical release dates because they are too incompetent to actually set a solid one.

I'm not even really convinced scores will be here by Wednesday if something really got messed up.

LSAC never stated or implied that the release date was theoretical. If you want to look at charts of previous releases and assume that means this release date is not "solid," that's your own fault. I don't see how they've done anything wrong by not releasing it early, as it was never guaranteed. Incompetent would be releasing it after the stated release date. All a nasty email will do is give them a reason to not release them early at all.

It kind of is because they never release the scores on the date that they say. I'd rather them not release the tests early as long as they DID give a definite release date.

[noleknight16]

I'm legit shocked we arent getting scores today.

What if we have to wait for the UTampa people to take their test on the 10th?

[foosbol21]

Wow wow wow is anyone else's page doing anything crazy with PDF logos at the bottom?

Just the page loading slowly. Did the same thing on Friday for me.

It's the icon legend.

[Clearly]

Wow wow wow is anyone else's page doing anything crazy with PDF logos at the bottom?

screenshot.

Can't, on iPad in class... I'm sure it's just a display glitch, it's repeating the PDF logo a milln times across the bottom of the page, Im pretty sure it wasn't doing that before however

[ampersand5]

the lsac website should put up ads. They'd make a fortune from pageviews.

[odoylerulez]

Yeah, I'm giving up at this point. LSAC will be receiving a nasty e-mail from me. I'm tired of organizing my schedule around theoretical release dates because they are too incompetent to actually set a solid one.

I'm not even really convinced scores will be here by Wednesday if something really got messed up.

LSAC never stated or implied that the release date was theoretical. If you want to look at charts of previous releases and assume that means this release date is not "solid," that's your own fault. I don't see how they've done anything wrong by not releasing it early, as it was never guaranteed. Incompetent would be releasing it after the stated release date. All a nasty email will do is give them a reason to not release them early at all.

Nah. LSAC would continue to not care what you think, nasty email or no.

That kind of attitude keeps way too many people from speaking up when they feel something is wrong. Sure, I know saying something will probably achieve nothing, but if there's any small chance that what I say will be read, I will be happy.