What the **** is up with PT 55? Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
jamlip

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 5:08 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by jamlip » Fri May 21, 2010 5:34 am

visualpurple wrote:I got 175 on PT55 - my best PT ever
Same here - 169. Hopefully this bodes well for the rest of my PTs.

tomwatts

Gold
Posts: 1710
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by tomwatts » Fri May 21, 2010 12:00 pm

I can't for the life of me find my notes for this test, but now I'm kind of curious. I remember the buses kind of sucking, but I don't remember having any real problems in the RC (could just be that I'm forgetting — it was maybe a year ago that I first did this, I think). My students are going to be working through this one for class next week; I suppose I'll do it myself and let you guys know what I think.

JasonR

Bronze
Posts: 410
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:09 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by JasonR » Fri May 21, 2010 3:53 pm

For a half-second I thought Sourpunch was back to crapping his special grade of stupidity all over the board. Whew.

User avatar
DaveBear07

Bronze
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:21 pm

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by DaveBear07 » Sat May 22, 2010 5:11 pm

Just took this one, did well (171) but I have a question---

The key says the correct answer for question 4 on the LGs is B. I couldn't see why my diagrams were wrong. Anybody else?

Cambridge LSAT

Bronze
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by Cambridge LSAT » Sat May 22, 2010 5:52 pm

Since R is with V, we know that M is with G (first rule). This leaves S to be paired with L. Since L prepares an opening argument (second rule), S must prepare a final argument. Although we know the composition of all three teams, the division of duties for two of them is uncertain. The third rule allows for two possibilities:
F: G V
O: M R

F: M R
O: G V

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
DaveBear07

Bronze
Posts: 187
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:21 pm

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by DaveBear07 » Sat May 22, 2010 10:31 pm

Cambridge LSAT wrote:Since R is with V, we know that M is with G (first rule). This leaves S to be paired with L. Since L prepares an opening argument (second rule), S must prepare a final argument. Although we know the composition of all three teams, the division of duties for two of them is uncertain. The third rule allows for two possibilities:
F: G V
O: M R

F: M R
O: G V
You are most definitely right. Thank you sir.

shoop

Bronze
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:52 pm

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by shoop » Mon May 24, 2010 11:08 am

I went into PT55 yesterday thinking it had that stupid dinosaur LG that everyone feels so violated by (turns out it's in 57). I had a huge rain cloud over my head and was expecting low 170s, so I was pretty thrilled over my 174.

Does anyone know a fast way to actually figure out the answer to the final LG question (last Q on the bus stop game)? I got the right answer, but only by guessing. I threw together a diagram that incorporated all the local info and the global rules, but I think it was a "must be true" question and my diagram involved more than one of the answers, so I guessed D with 10 seconds left.

Cambridge LSAT

Bronze
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by Cambridge LSAT » Mon May 24, 2010 11:29 am

The question gives us G - S. Applying the fourth rule, we have J - F. Combining this with the third rule gives V - J - F. Thus, choice D must be false.

d34d9823

Gold
Posts: 1879
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by d34d9823 » Mon May 24, 2010 11:35 am

Weird, I got my best score yet on 55. I've been PTing at like 176, but I made a 179 on this one.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
malfurion

Bronze
Posts: 159
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:40 pm

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by malfurion » Mon May 24, 2010 1:43 pm

I had been avoiding reading this thread until now cause I didn't want to bias my results, but finally took PT55 today. Didn't feel too confident after I finished but I only missed 6 for a 174 so I'm happy with that. That damn talk-story passage messed me up bad; that's the exact type of passage that I just can't stand. It wasn't that it was particularly difficult to read, but it made it really hard to stay focused and the questions were pretty ridiculous. The cotton fiber/cloth was a total WTF. So I missed 3 on that passage, but amazingly didn't miss any others on RC. Both of the LR sections seemed easier than normal to me, I finished them both with 6-7 minutes remaining and missed 1 on each. I flew through the first 3 games and had 15 minutes left for the last game, which was good because I needed almost all of that time to do the bus stop game. Figured I must have screwed it up and missed something for it to take that long, but apparently not. I made one stupid mistake on a question in the email game and that was my only miss on LG. It seems like I always make one just completely retarded, inexcusable, dumbass mistake on each test... counting is hard, apparently.

User avatar
BigA

Bronze
Posts: 448
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 7:22 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by BigA » Mon May 24, 2010 5:07 pm

hmmn, guess everyone's different then. I thought the first LR section was one of the hardest ever given. What gives?

am060459

Silver
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:14 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by am060459 » Wed May 26, 2010 6:09 pm

took PT 55 today and balanced in my view of it. i got a 160 on it (bounced back after break yesterday in which i was crying over my 154 on PT 54 from the day before that).

RC was a bitch on this. the first and last passages were okay but passages 2 (purple lossestrife) and passage 3 (Kingston) were hard (more so Kingston).

the first LR was harder than the second one.

the freaking buses game tripped me up and i got my -2 for the section from the last two questions.

PT 55
LR -8
LG -2
RC -13 FML!!!!!!

User avatar
Knock

Platinum
Posts: 5151
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by Knock » Thu May 27, 2010 6:26 pm

Taking this PT now. Halfway through, on my 15 min break. The RC was really tough, especially the talk-story passage, which was probably the hardest ever for me. Guess we will see when I grade it.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
jpSartre

Bronze
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:05 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by jpSartre » Thu May 27, 2010 6:40 pm

Knockglock wrote:Taking this PT now. Halfway through, on my 15 min break. The RC was really tough, especially the talk-story passage, which was probably the hardest ever for me. Guess we will see when I grade it.
I went -3 on that RC, and missed 1 on the talk story passage. But that, combined with -2 on both LRs, -3 on LGs and the tight curve... 169 coming off of a 176 on 54 didn't feel so great. Both those were after two days of 5 hour LG/RC sessions which I think depressed me a little. I took the day off yesterday and did light review of 54/55 today. 56 tomorrow, hoping the burnout feelings will be gone.

User avatar
pilawpcv

New
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:29 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by pilawpcv » Fri May 28, 2010 1:22 am

You know, I had finally managed to forget about the madness that was October '08. Thanks for bringing it up again * tear *

Seriously, it was pretty bizarre; RC is always my best section, and I was freaked out when I had a ton of trouble with it. And! The buses! It was my second take of the LSAT, and I thought I was ready. Oops. Hence, October '10 here I come!

User avatar
absolutazn87

Silver
Posts: 715
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:16 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by absolutazn87 » Fri May 28, 2010 1:54 pm

Wow. Glad to see I wasn't the only one that felt totally screwed by this test.

I actually took it for real in October 2008 and was shellshocked when I got my score and saw the curve.

But I took it as a PT a month ago and scored a 171. So....progress! 10 more days til June 7th!

User avatar
Dr. Strangelove

Silver
Posts: 557
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:59 pm

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by Dr. Strangelove » Fri May 28, 2010 1:56 pm

I'm taking PT 55 today.
I'll let you know what happens..

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
confusedlawyer

Bronze
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 11:21 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by confusedlawyer » Fri May 28, 2010 2:55 pm

took it yesterday, 167, actually got the cotton fiber right but -3 on the talk story passage. First LR really screwed me made some dumb mistakes

User avatar
confusedlawyer

Bronze
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 11:21 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by confusedlawyer » Fri May 28, 2010 2:58 pm

The last logic game was time consuming, but the only thing that bothered me was the last question. I got to it when time was done so I just guessed D without even reading it (D is my de facto guess choice and lucky enough the answer was D). However I took some time just to do the question and it took me 5 minutes on a count of it being an absolutely rediculous question. Safe to say if I see anything like that on test day I'll gladly guess D and move along

User avatar
jmc8y

New
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:16 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by jmc8y » Fri May 28, 2010 11:39 pm

visualpurple wrote:I got 175 on PT55 - my best PT ever
I'm with you. this was my best PT ever. looooved the reading comp but maybe it's because i'm a humanities guy

User avatar
Rotor

Silver
Posts: 914
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:06 pm

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by Rotor » Sat May 29, 2010 12:52 am

jmc8y wrote:
visualpurple wrote:I got 175 on PT55 - my best PT ever
I'm with you. this was my best PT ever. looooved the reading comp but maybe it's because i'm a humanities guy
Nope. I'm a humanities guy and got pwned by stupid talk stories. Hated the bus game too, but did OK on it. I was amazed when scores were released and we saw what the curve was.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
typ3

Silver
Posts: 1362
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:04 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by typ3 » Sat May 29, 2010 1:15 am

Yea, normally i only miss -2 on RC and I was bent over a barrel with -8 on this RC. No idea why.

User avatar
jmc8y

New
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 1:16 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by jmc8y » Sat May 29, 2010 3:14 am

that's really strange. i'm normally in the -2 - -6 range on RC but pulled a -0 on that one. didn't think the talk story was a problem at all.

User avatar
zworykin

Bronze
Posts: 438
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:18 am

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by zworykin » Sat May 29, 2010 3:47 pm

Agreed; the RC passages didn't seem anything out of the ordinary for me. I made a mistake bubbling one of my responses on loosestrife--bringing me to a -2 overall for the test and a 179. I really, really have to remember to check my bubbling on test day!

My other miss was a stupid mistake on LR1 #19.

And I made a major mistake on LG that could have cost me big-time. My strategy is to rewrite all the rules even if I'm not trying to make diagrams, and I properly wrote first=last, but somehow I internalized it as first=/=last. That cost me a couple minutes of time redoing the first few questions. I ended the section with 50 seconds left. The bus game took me 10 minutes, much longer than my average.

Maddie

New
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:17 pm

Re: What the **** is up with PT 55?

Post by Maddie » Sat May 29, 2010 6:12 pm

I just took this one and ended up with a 161 which is a tie for my worst PT score. I was blaming it on having cramps until reading this. Now I have 2 excuses so I feel even better :D

LR -7 combined which is my average
LG -3 ( avg. is -2) but I got lucky and guessed D correctly on 2 of those bus questions)
RC -10 (my avg. is -6)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”