I had the same as you, my 4th LR was real. not too sure on the 1st/3rd thoughrosieposie12 wrote:For those who had LR RC LR LR LG, do we know which section was the experimental, I remember the questions that are real, but not what section they were in. If it’s the same format, is the test exactly the same?
The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
- PrezRand
- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
How can you guys tell what was real?
Had
LR LC LR LR LG.
I'm gonna assume I didn't hit my score and start preparing for feb in about 2 weeks
Had
LR LC LR LR LG.
I'm gonna assume I didn't hit my score and start preparing for feb in about 2 weeks
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:50 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
oh hey! how'd it go?saffles wrote:“Waiting for the end to come. Wishing I had strength to stand...”
some of us in NYC are meeting up tonight and I remember you saying you were here too and wanted to go to a meet up?
well we are! if you're still down to meet us inbox me!
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:49 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
georgeNY wrote:So, I had an experimental LR, and my test had the following configuration: LR (25), RC, LR (26), LR (26), LG.
For me, 2 LRs were very easy and one was pretty hard. I remember the T Rex Q, but not which section it was in. I really hope that it was my third LR that was the experimental! For people with the same test configuration, was the third LR (26) the experimental?
Come to think of it, I *think* my second LR had a question in it about a company creating exercise classes for employees. Was this real or experimental? I hope real! That 26 section wasn't bad.
I’m also hoping the third LR was experimental! I remember it having a lot of the same *type* of questions in a row, and it feeling harder/ different than the first two AND it having some oddly worded questions. So maybe it was the exprimental?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
UPDATE: sorry I didn't include it in the poll but I left out the option of "it went well but still give me a damn drink"
- JamesBlahDeBlah
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:35 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
LG is my best section (like I've missed maybe four questions over all the PTs) and I missed two definitely (last question on third and fourth game). Maybe it was trickier than we think because the games themselves seemed straight forward, but the questions were actually somewhat difficult?littlewing67 wrote:but for some reason I messed up rules in both LG. IDK WHY!!!!??? I couldnt have 2 pages on my desk to refer to the rules...............
Last edited by JamesBlahDeBlah on Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:34 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I remember a question from my second LR section, LR2, (they went LR1 (25), RC, LR2 (26), LR3 (26), LG) that was about a company making exercise classes for its employees to reduce stress and improve productivity. I know LR1 couldn't have been experimental, since it was only 25 questions, so it was either LR2 or LR3. Was the exercise question real?
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 5:49 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I believe T Rex was in the third so I eliminated that one. I think the weird argument question was in the first but I'm not sure if the 1st or 2nd was experimentalrosieposie12 wrote:For those who had LR RC LR LR LG, do we know which section was the experimental, I remember the questions that are real, but not what section they were in. If it’s the same format, is the test exactly the same?
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:49 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Mikey wrote:I had the same as you, my 4th LR was real. not too sure on the 1st/3rd thoughrosieposie12 wrote:For those who had LR RC LR LR LG, do we know which section was the experimental, I remember the questions that are real, but not what section they were in. If it’s the same format, is the test exactly the same?
Do you remember if it had two “which arguement is similar” questions towards the end?/ am I allowed to ask that
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:34 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
also, does anyone remember the bubble answers for ? I got a bunch of BANS
- PhiladelphiaCollins
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:31 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Did not go badly IMO. Had RC-LR-LG-LG-LR. Nice big room and big desks. That Chinese passage was weird and I rushed through the Darwin passage but otherwise I feel OK about the whole thing. The first LR I thought was much easier than 80 & 81.
Inb4 156
Inb4 156
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
ANYONE from NYC who wants to meet up tonight at a bar with some of us from in here PM ME (or you can PM lilwing as well)!
ANYONE is welcome, we just want to celebrate that this shit is over! Come through!
ANYONE is welcome, we just want to celebrate that this shit is over! Come through!

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:11 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG. Felt like the third LR was the hardest one of the 3 and was super bummed to have that be real. The 3rd one had the T Rex, Black and White, prehistoric finger fish, etc. Otherwise everything else was pretty straightforward. Wasn't a fan of the Chinese RC but not too bad. Games were pretty standard flew through the first 2, last 2 were trickier but not bad
Last edited by cubswin16 on Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:12 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
BANgeorgeNY wrote:also, does anyone remember the bubble answers for the BAN
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 5:49 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
littlewing67 wrote:LURKERS COME SAY HELLO!!! MAKE AN ACCOUNT!!! WE DON'T BITE UNLESS U R A T. REX

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:01 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
LR RC LR LR LG...seems like a common one
Felt good about RC until the social Darwinism passage, still probably didn't bomb it. That was all I was really worried about. All 3 LR's went pretty well and almost felt too easy, but I guess that's from being prepared (I'm guessing one of the 3rd/4th ones were the exp section, since both had 26 questions). LG was pretty easy and I'm glad it was last. I definitely relaxed when I saw LR after the break and knew I didn't have a 2nd RC coming.
How sensitive is LSAC's scoring hardware on answers that are erased but still have some light haze behind? That's the only thing that could get me on a few answers.
Also, report the tip.
Felt good about RC until the social Darwinism passage, still probably didn't bomb it. That was all I was really worried about. All 3 LR's went pretty well and almost felt too easy, but I guess that's from being prepared (I'm guessing one of the 3rd/4th ones were the exp section, since both had 26 questions). LG was pretty easy and I'm glad it was last. I definitely relaxed when I saw LR after the break and knew I didn't have a 2nd RC coming.
How sensitive is LSAC's scoring hardware on answers that are erased but still have some light haze behind? That's the only thing that could get me on a few answers.
Also, report the tip.
- saffles
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 5:46 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
The fomo is real...haha, yes, littlewing dm’ed me. You guys have fun! I need to release frustration by killing some raiders in F4. It went horribly. I literally guessed on at least six questions per section D:Mikey wrote:oh hey! how'd it go?saffles wrote:“Waiting for the end to come. Wishing I had strength to stand...”
some of us in NYC are meeting up tonight and I remember you saying you were here too and wanted to go to a meet up?
well we are! if you're still down to meet us inbox me!
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:49 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I had two RCs (apparently the Emmy Noether and Arbitration Clause one was experimental). Very easy (much easier than on the June administration); I had about 10 minutes left on both. Not sure about the LRs; I had a few minutes left to check my answers, and I felt good about them, but some questions were definitely tricky.
As to LG... Well, hopefully I didn't bomb quite as badly as in June. Felt good about the first three games, but filled out the last one with uneducated guesses. Oh well. I only did this for funsies (admitted through early decision, but asked Admissions if I could use a score boost to renegotiate scholarship; they said YES.)
And Kate Li should obviously pass the tip on to the newspaper of record.
As to LG... Well, hopefully I didn't bomb quite as badly as in June. Felt good about the first three games, but filled out the last one with uneducated guesses. Oh well. I only did this for funsies (admitted through early decision, but asked Admissions if I could use a score boost to renegotiate scholarship; they said YES.)
And Kate Li should obviously pass the tip on to the newspaper of record.
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
LR-RC-LR-LR-LG
I'm pissed at myself because I flubbed a rule in the 2nd game and caught it but the time I spent correcting it prevented me from answering the last 2 questions so there goes my -0 LG.
LR was normal. RC, comparatively, felt easier than Sept or June. I'm really unsure about the curve, I really hate saying it it but I feel like it's not going to be -11, I just pray it's not a -8.
I felt like I was on fire today, finished with time to spare in all sections but LG. Even caught some mistakes on questions I went back to. I'm calling a 165-170+ for me because of my flub in LG. If I corrected properly and I performed to my averages for everything else I'm at the cusp for 170 based on whatever the 170 curve is. I'm hoping I performed better than my averages for LR/RC to offset an issues from my goof in LG.
Hoping my second 26 question LG was the experimental, I was slower on that one....
I'm pissed at myself because I flubbed a rule in the 2nd game and caught it but the time I spent correcting it prevented me from answering the last 2 questions so there goes my -0 LG.
LR was normal. RC, comparatively, felt easier than Sept or June. I'm really unsure about the curve, I really hate saying it it but I feel like it's not going to be -11, I just pray it's not a -8.
I felt like I was on fire today, finished with time to spare in all sections but LG. Even caught some mistakes on questions I went back to. I'm calling a 165-170+ for me because of my flub in LG. If I corrected properly and I performed to my averages for everything else I'm at the cusp for 170 based on whatever the 170 curve is. I'm hoping I performed better than my averages for LR/RC to offset an issues from my goof in LG.
Hoping my second 26 question LG was the experimental, I was slower on that one....
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- PhiladelphiaCollins
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:31 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
So robots LG was experimental? Thank god
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:11 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Kate Li should definitely self publishBlougram wrote:I had two RCs (apparently the Emmy Noether and Arbitration Clause one was experimental). Very easy (much easier than on the June administration); I had about 10 minutes left on both. Not sure about the LRs; I had a few minutes left to check my answers, and I felt good about them, but some questions were definitely tricky.
As to LG... Well, hopefully I didn't bomb quite as badly as in June. Felt good about the first three games, but filled out the last one with uneducated guesses. Oh well. I only did this for funsies (admitted through early decision, but asked Admissions if I could use a score boost to renegotiate scholarship; they said YES.)
And Kate Li should obviously pass the tip on to the newspaper of record.
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Guys, reminder before the mods see and start handing out bans, don't discuss ACs and order like YYY.
- Experiment626
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I would like to recommend the end of the OP topic be- Translating to 180.Mikey wrote:UPDATE: sorry I didn't include it in the poll but I left out the option of "it went well but still give me a damn drink"
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login