June 2017 Waiters Thread- Grayday! -9 curve. GL all Forum
- augustyyy

- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:36 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
- Jack_Kelly

- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Stupid question: When people say -9 curve is that -9 to 170??
- Mint-Berry_Crunch

- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Do not discuss specific answers to Qs
mod edit: THANK YOU
mod edit: THANK YOU
-
Slippin' Jimmy

- Posts: 892
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Yep heavy isotopes was real, and a real pain in the ass. Think I got that one right but after soooo much time.Future Ex-Engineer wrote:Easiest LG section ever.
RC was difficult but not impossible.
26Q LR section was pretty normal.
25Q LR section was quite difficult (assuming the section with heavy isotopes was real)
-
BOSStongrl

- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 9:18 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
dm1683

- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Did you have a Q about anti-auto theft devices? It was at the end of one of the sections and it was one of two WTF question I can remember, the other one was a PR about building a building near a marsh.Slippin' Jimmy wrote:RC I actually felt wasn't difficult at all, the subject matter was complex but the structure was simple.
LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal
LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.
Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT
Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.
- Future Ex-Engineer

- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
- Future Ex-Engineer

- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Had marsh building, but no anti-theft.dm1683 wrote:Did you have a Q about anti-auto theft devices? It was at the end of one of the sections and it was one of two WTF question I can remember, the other one was a PR about building a building near a marsh.Slippin' Jimmy wrote:RC I actually felt wasn't difficult at all, the subject matter was complex but the structure was simple.
LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal
LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.
Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT
Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.
Heavy isotopes got me
-
Slippin' Jimmy

- Posts: 892
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Don't remember either one, but I don't remember any of my first LR besides it was easy. Wasn't from the mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a rowdm1683 wrote:Did you have a Q about anti-auto theft devices? It was at the end of one of the sections and it was one of two WTF question I can remember, the other one was a PR about building a building near a marsh.Slippin' Jimmy wrote:RC I actually felt wasn't difficult at all, the subject matter was complex but the structure was simple.
LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal
LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.
Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT
Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.
-
dm1683

- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
YES!!! Eff that damn question. Thats the only one I really felt uneasy about. Was probably the experimental section.Future Ex-Engineer wrote:Had marsh building, but no anti-theft.dm1683 wrote:Did you have a Q about anti-auto theft devices? It was at the end of one of the sections and it was one of two WTF question I can remember, the other one was a PR about building a building near a marsh.Slippin' Jimmy wrote:RC I actually felt wasn't difficult at all, the subject matter was complex but the structure was simple.
LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal
LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.
Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT
Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.
Heavy isotopes got me
Yep. Although after reconsidering I doubt it will actually be that low. Probably -10/11.Jack_Kelly wrote:Stupid question: When people say -9 curve is that -9 to 170??
Last edited by dm1683 on Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Slippin' Jimmy

- Posts: 892
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
- jsr739

- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:29 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
-
saf18hornet

- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 34iplaw

- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Well - ya'll are done.
Congrats, yo.
GREY DAY BETTING TIME AND SPECULATION COMMENCE!
Congrats, yo.
GREY DAY BETTING TIME AND SPECULATION COMMENCE!
-
Slippin' Jimmy

- Posts: 892
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
My money is on -11. Sure the LG was easy but RC seems to have given people major trouble, and that second LR was definitely one of the harder ones I've seen IMHO.dm1683 wrote:YES!!! Eff that damn question. Thats the only one I really felt uneasy about. Was probably the experimental section.Future Ex-Engineer wrote:Had marsh building, but no anti-theft.dm1683 wrote:Did you have a Q about anti-auto theft devices? It was at the end of one of the sections and it was one of two WTF question I can remember, the other one was a PR about building a building near a marsh.Slippin' Jimmy wrote:RC I actually felt wasn't difficult at all, the subject matter was complex but the structure was simple.
LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal
LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.
Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT
Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.
Heavy isotopes got meYep. Although after reconsidering I doubt it will actually be that low. Probably -10/11.Jack_Kelly wrote:Stupid question: When people say -9 curve is that -9 to 170??
- Mint-Berry_Crunch

- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
I'm gunna get nailed on this test bc of the curve
-
Ntp73821

- Posts: 612
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 7:53 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- tuna_wasabi

- Posts: 292
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:16 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
-
dm1683

- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
- tuna_wasabi

- Posts: 292
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:16 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about a specific kind of question
- tuna_wasabi

- Posts: 292
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:16 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
dm1683

- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Not really, but the science passage about "inferential thinking" was super tough.lynn.wibi wrote:Does anyone find the comparative passage pretty hard?
- augustyyy

- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:36 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
-
roflsat

- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 9:13 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Anybody have any fun test center stories/nightmares today?
- Experiment626

- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Checking in...
RC was definitely my worst section. Got the 5 min warning with one passage left but I made sure it was the one with the least number of questions soooo hopefully I smashed all the other passages and at worst go -5.
LG- CRUSHED IT. OMG I got to the last game and was in reverse shock that it wasn't a weird one.... I had to brute force it, I think I missed a key inference that made it take longer.
LR... Not sure which is experimental but they weren't too bad. Although flying through isotopes with 1.5 minutes left was not fun...
RC was definitely my worst section. Got the 5 min warning with one passage left but I made sure it was the one with the least number of questions soooo hopefully I smashed all the other passages and at worst go -5.
LG- CRUSHED IT. OMG I got to the last game and was in reverse shock that it wasn't a weird one.... I had to brute force it, I think I missed a key inference that made it take longer.
LR... Not sure which is experimental but they weren't too bad. Although flying through isotopes with 1.5 minutes left was not fun...
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login