High scorers (170+), what was your starting point? Forum

[QuentonCassidy]

174 ---> 180

LG was actually the only section that I always aced (even in the initial diagnostic), so all my improvement came outside logic games.

[Instrumental]

174 ---> 180

LG was actually the only section that I always aced (even in the initial diagnostic), so all my improvement came outside logic games.

[TAD]

174 ---> 180

LG was actually the only section that I always aced (even in the initial diagnostic), so all my improvement came outside logic games.

[mathis1490]

.

[Rupert Pupkin]

174 ---> 180

LG was actually the only section that I always aced (even in the initial diagnostic), so all my improvement came outside logic games.

[dxgriffin]

Low 140s to 175 on December 2016 test. I studied off and on for about two years (around full-time work and parenting). The test is totally learnable if you have the time to learn it.

[ltowns1]

For you guys who started out low, could you tell me how you approached a full test when you introduced timed restrictions? Did you try to do as many as you could accurately, sacrificing the ability to get to all the questions? I've studied for a long time, and I'm still stuck with a low score.I know the fundamental steps on each section, but I feel like part of my problem is that I try to get to every single problem instead of just slowing down (extremely if necessary) in order to get better with accuracy while still doing fully timed test.

[dm1683]

174 ---> 180

LG was actually the only section that I always aced (even in the initial diagnostic), so all my improvement came outside logic games.

are you an alien?

[appind]

around 130 diagnostic

received low 170s on the last administration

missed out on a high 170s score mainly due to an LG pattern game.

[VapidP]

159/160 (can't remember) - 175