The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

What score did you get?

Mythical 180
4
4%
170-179
22
22%
160-169
45
46%
150-159
21
21%
140-149
4
4%
130-139
0
No votes
120-129
2
2%
 
Total votes: 98

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:04 pm

Wait I remember my LR was 25-26-26...bats & moths was one of the 26. What was the other real?

(Please be the other 26)

chaoticx5

New
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 12:55 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by chaoticx5 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:05 pm

AbbeyS wrote:Wait I remember my LR was 25-26-26...bats & moths was one of the 26. What was the other real?

(Please be the other 26)
I think it was 25. I remember cause I thought it was an odd number. Do you remember an open and closed train station game?

User avatar
splitterfromhell

Silver
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by splitterfromhell » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:06 pm

For LR, does anyone remember choosing the same letter a lot in a stretch of questions? I had the same letter for like six answers in seven questions.

User avatar
Roundhill

New
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:36 pm

.

Post by Roundhill » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:07 pm

.
Last edited by Roundhill on Tue Jul 05, 2016 6:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.

PoopNpants

Silver
Posts: 854
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:40 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by PoopNpants » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:08 pm

I had two RC sections, both of which I found pretty difficult, although the shrubs one wasn't too bad I just spent way too much time on the previous 3 passages which left me screwed time-wise. LG wasn't bad and I think LR was a cakewalk

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


GayElleWoods

New
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 4:45 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by GayElleWoods » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:09 pm

I had three LR 1, 3 and 5 which one didn't count ?

User avatar
Roundhill

New
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:36 pm

.

Post by Roundhill » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:10 pm

.
Last edited by Roundhill on Tue Jul 05, 2016 6:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
splitterfromhell

Silver
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by splitterfromhell » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:10 pm

GayElleWoods wrote:I had three LR 1, 3 and 5 which one didn't count ?
Impossible to tell from this information.

GayElleWoods

New
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 4:45 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by GayElleWoods » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:14 pm

The real logic games had the question about workers traveling to conferences in Paris and two other countries, also one question was spaced out 3 month sale 1 item first month, 2 on sale second month and 3 in the third month. And real RC had Shrubs and aging them

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


jleon25

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 2:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by jleon25 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:15 pm

wellitsover wrote:Checking in.

Had experimental LR, second one had turbines. Literally can't remember anything else right now, and forgot to count number of questions... Again.Struggled on RC.
I had exp lr as well.

25-25-26

Turbines was 2nd on mine and I thought it was a little tougher than 1st lr

Did anyone who had lr have a question with Gala discussed? That was in my first lr I think

User avatar
Shib26

Bronze
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:03 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Shib26 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:16 pm

I just walked out and feel like I barely remember anything. I do know I was real happy that RC seemed easy until I got to the second one (with hedges) and realized the first was probably experimental.

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:17 pm

Anyone remember an LR question about physics & psychology?

GayElleWoods

New
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 4:45 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by GayElleWoods » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:19 pm

AbbeyS wrote:Anyone remember an LR question about physics & psychology?
Yes I had 3 sections 1 3 and 5 I think that question was in my third section. Pretty sure it's the section that didn't count

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
fishpaste1

Bronze
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 3:25 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by fishpaste1 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:20 pm

jleon25 wrote:
wellitsover wrote:Checking in.

Had experimental LR, second one had turbines. Literally can't remember anything else right now, and forgot to count number of questions... Again.Struggled on RC.
I had exp lr as well.

25-25-26

Turbines was 2nd on mine and I thought it was a little tougher than 1st lr

Did anyone who had lr have a question with Gala discussed? That was in my first lr I think
Yeah, I had the Gala question.

GayElleWoods

New
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 4:45 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by GayElleWoods » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:20 pm

So are we sure the Bats and Moths counted and does anyone remember any other of the questions from that section????

Htexasguy

New
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:56 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Htexasguy » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:25 pm

For LG, did anyone have racehorses

User avatar
jb111

New
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:35 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by jb111 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:26 pm

Posted this on study thread:
Just finished up. Felt very fair to me. Some interesting inferences necessary on the games and a handful of tough LR sprinkled around (I had 3 LR sections tho). Nothing too crazy IMO, curious what others think.

Good luck to everyone.
Guess I will add what I can to the discussion here.

The RC section with hedges was real. It was the only RC I had.

My LR were 25-25-26. Based on what other people have said, one of those 25 must have been the experimental. The second one felt weird to me, but I cannot for the life of me remember a single question.

I thought the LG was interesting. Easy game types, but some unique/tricky rules.
Last edited by jb111 on Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Htexasguy

New
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:56 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by Htexasguy » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:27 pm

GayElleWoods wrote:So are we sure the Bats and Moths counted and does anyone remember any other of the questions from that section????
Bats and moths was real

lurker816

Bronze
Posts: 126
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 6:48 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by lurker816 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:27 pm

GayElleWoods wrote:The real logic games had the question about workers traveling to conferences in Paris and two other countries, also one question was spaced out 3 month sale 1 item first month, 2 on sale second month and 3 in the third month. And real RC had Shrubs and aging them
Ugh wait really? So LG with the houses for sale in-out was experimental? Uh oh

User avatar
betterLawyerUP

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:41 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by betterLawyerUP » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:28 pm

At least 10 points below my average again, I fukn panicked again.

My first section was LG and I was done in 25min, it was stupid easy and I thought it was experimental. Next was RC and I probably went perfect, but then I was shocked at section 5 with the real RC, I was so frustrated I panicked and possibly went like -12 on real RC, all guesses cause I panicked at the first passage. Once again LR I was uncharacteristic as well and lost on some questions. I feel so stupid lol I just want to score near my average wtf.

User avatar
AbbeyS

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:17 am

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by AbbeyS » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:30 pm

jb111 wrote:Posted this on study thread:
Just finished up. Felt very fair to me. Some interesting inferences necessary on the games and a handful of tough LR sprinkled around (I had 3 LR sections tho). Nothing too crazy IMO, curious what others think.

Good luck to everyone.
Guess I will add what I can to the discussion here.

The RC section with hedges was real. It was the only RC I had.

My LR were 25-25-26. Based on what other people have said, one of those 25 must have been the experimental. The second one felt weird to me, but I cannot for the life of my remember a single question.

I thought the LG was interesting. Easy game types, but some unique/tricky rules.
NoOoOoOooooo this means my first LR was real (only had 1 25) and I effing bombed it....seriously couldn't concentrate with my proctors having a full-on conversation

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Roundhill

New
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:36 pm

.

Post by Roundhill » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:32 pm

.
Last edited by Roundhill on Tue Jul 05, 2016 6:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
RonnyDiniro

Bronze
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 4:59 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by RonnyDiniro » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:33 pm

Calling out now a -10/-9 curve

User avatar
jb111

New
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:35 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by jb111 » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:33 pm

AbbeyS wrote: NoOoOoOooooo this means my first LR was real (only had 1 25) and I effing bombed it....seriously couldn't concentrate with my proctors having a full-on conversation
That sucks and is unacceptable from your proctors. I hope the section went better for you than you are remembering right now.

User avatar
splitterfromhell

Silver
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 8:37 pm

Re: The Official February 2016 Waiter's Thread

Post by splitterfromhell » Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:34 pm

RonnyDiniro wrote:Calling out now a -10/-9 curve
-10 sounds about right.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”