Question for test takers who have done bad Forum
- ms9
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: Question for test takers who have done bad
Correct, I wrote it in 2013. Nothing has changed much, as I noted at the bottom with the "Oct 2015" update. All schools only care about the high score as I have been crying to the masses since 2006 when the ABA (and thus USNWR) started only collecting high scores.
- cub1014
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:30 am
Re: Question for test takers who have done bad
Hey Spivey,MikeSpivey wrote:I have blogged about this very thing:
http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/should ... sat-score/
Would this also apply to schools like Cornell if, say, your score improved 2 points each on the second and third takes, based on the criterion they say they use for taking the highest score?
- ms9
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: Question for test takers who have done bad
Yep! Whatever a school says, what they actually do is only care about the high score. The possible exception is Yale, who has a faculty admissions committee and who outspends per student the competition so absurdly highly that even if their LSAT score were to plummet because they were averaging they would still be ranked #1 USNWR. Any other school who would average would lose ground to their competition, and thus they do not. They say things a bit more ambiguously than that, but that don't average!cub1014 wrote:Hey Spivey,MikeSpivey wrote:I have blogged about this very thing:
http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/should ... sat-score/
Would this also apply to schools like Cornell if, say, your score improved 2 points each on the second and third takes, based on the criterion they say they use for taking the highest score?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login