Question for future lawyers Forum

[Clyde Frog]

Seriously, why do you care? What is the point of your challenge?

to find out the answer to the question: Does publishing or sharing the above question violate LSAC's copyright?

no part of my original post was sarcastic or joking; it was a legitimate question; i don't see why that is so hard to understand

This guy and his ad hominems. Typical sheeple....

[Tanicius]

Seriously, why do you care? What is the point of your challenge?

to find out the answer to the question: Does publishing or sharing the above question violate LSAC's copyright?

no part of my original post was sarcastic or joking; it was a legitimate question; i don't see why that is so hard to understand

Then you are indeed asking for legal advice.

[03152016]

seeing as how this topic is completely useless, i hope it gets lounged
op would go over really well there

[Clyde Frog]

Please move this to lounge, for science?

[A. Nony Mouse]

Seriously, why do you care? What is the point of your challenge?

to find out the answer to the question: Does publishing or sharing the above question violate LSAC's copyright?

no part of my original post was sarcastic or joking; it was a legitimate question; i don't see why that is so hard to understand

Because it's hard to see why you'd want to know the answer to this question unless you were looking for legal advice (e.g. on publishing your own test guide or the like).

[Ded Precedent]

Please move this to lounge, for science?

This is too dumb even for the lounge. We have standards.

[Gooner91]

OP this is a pretty dumb question and your attitude is terrible. You should feel bad for posting it.
Is there anyway we can move this to the lounge so I can post pictures of The Zlatan in response?

[gatesome]

Seriously, why do you care? What is the point of your challenge?

to find out the answer to the question: Does publishing or sharing the above question violate LSAC's copyright?

no part of my original post was sarcastic or joking; it was a legitimate question; i don't see why that is so hard to understand

Because it's hard to see why you'd want to know the answer to this question unless you were looking for legal advice (e.g. on publishing your own test guide or the like).

So you know the answer, but you're withholding the answer because you're skeptical of my motivations?

My question is not asking for legal advice and your continual use of that phrase only reinforces your naivete.

[Clyde Frog]

Seriously, why do you care? What is the point of your challenge?

to find out the answer to the question: Does publishing or sharing the above question violate LSAC's copyright?

no part of my original post was sarcastic or joking; it was a legitimate question; i don't see why that is so hard to understand

Because it's hard to see why you'd want to know the answer to this question unless you were looking for legal advice (e.g. on publishing your own test guide or the like).

So you know the answer, but you're withholding the answer because you're skeptical of my motivations?

My question is not asking for legal advice and your continual use of that phrase only reinforces your naivete.

You sound like someone trying to act smart, but with a touch of virginity.

[gatesome]

If you take an exact question and just change the variables, you are still copying the underlying thinking, which is what they are testing. I think you should not do it.

even though this guy never followed up he made the best post of the thread

too bad people here are too busy avoiding a question to try to answer it... maybe they'll be good lawyers after all

[03152016]

You sound like someone trying to act smart, but with a touch of virginity.

notice he doesn't deny it

[Ded Precedent]

My question is not asking for legal advice

Does publishing or sharing the above question violate LSAC's copyright?

Duurrrrrrrrrrr

[gatesome]

My question is not asking for legal advice

Does publishing or sharing the above question violate LSAC's copyright?

Duurrrrrrrrrrr

hashtag difference between legal advice and posing a legal question

[gatesome]

You sound like someone trying to act smart, but with a touch of virginity.

notice he doesn't deny it

lol mfw graduate students still call others "virgins"

[Gooner91]

If you take an exact question and just change the variables, you are still copying the underlying thinking, which is what they are testing. I think you should not do it.

even though this guy never followed up he made the best post of the thread

too bad people here are too busy avoiding a question to try to answer it... maybe they'll be good lawyers after all

It's copyright infringement. Now go lose your virginity.

*picture of The Zlatan here*

[Tanicius]

Watch this trial competition about copyright infringement to learn your answer:

http://www.baylor.edu/law/advocacy/index.php?id=82295

[gatesome]

Watch this trial competition about copyright infringement to learn your answer:

http://www.baylor.edu/law/advocacy/index.php?id=82295

posting that constitutes legal advice

mods please remove

[gatesome]

If you take an exact question and just change the variables, you are still copying the underlying thinking, which is what they are testing. I think you should not do it.

even though this guy never followed up he made the best post of the thread

too bad people here are too busy avoiding a question to try to answer it... maybe they'll be good lawyers after all

It's copyright infringement. Now go lose your virginity.

*picture of The Zlatan here*

few years late m8. maybe your turn?

[Gooner91]

If you take an exact question and just change the variables, you are still copying the underlying thinking, which is what they are testing. I think you should not do it.

even though this guy never followed up he made the best post of the thread

too bad people here are too busy avoiding a question to try to answer it... maybe they'll be good lawyers after all

It's copyright infringement. Now go lose your virginity.

*picture of The Zlatan here*

few years late m8. maybe your turn?

Just having a rough night?

[03152016]

You sound like someone trying to act smart, but with a touch of virginity.

notice he doesn't deny it

lol mfw graduate students still call others "virgins"

nah not others plural
just you

that's just how the 'graduate students' at 'top-grad-schools.com' roll i guess

[Clyde Frog]

If you take an exact question and just change the variables, you are still copying the underlying thinking, which is what they are testing. I think you should not do it.

even though this guy never followed up he made the best post of the thread

too bad people here are too busy avoiding a question to try to answer it... maybe they'll be good lawyers after all

It's copyright infringement. Now go lose your virginity.

*picture of The Zlatan here*

few years late m8. maybe your turn?

Everything cool bro?

[gatesome]

even though this guy never followed up he made the best post of the thread

too bad people here are too busy avoiding a question to try to answer it... maybe they'll be good lawyers after all

It's copyright infringement. Now go lose your virginity.

*picture of The Zlatan here*

few years late m8. maybe your turn?

Everything cool bro?

that was my polite way of saying i haven't been a virgin this decade so your insults are meaningless

[Gooner91]

Wife cheat on you with the pool guy?

[A. Nony Mouse]

Seriously, why do you care? What is the point of your challenge?

to find out the answer to the question: Does publishing or sharing the above question violate LSAC's copyright?

no part of my original post was sarcastic or joking; it was a legitimate question; i don't see why that is so hard to understand

Because it's hard to see why you'd want to know the answer to this question unless you were looking for legal advice (e.g. on publishing your own test guide or the like).

So you know the answer, but you're withholding the answer because you're skeptical of my motivations?

My question is not asking for legal advice and your continual use of that phrase only reinforces your naivete.

No, I don't know the answer, but I don't care about the answer, either, and don't see why anyone would. I care about why you raised this in the LSAT prep/discussion forum when you're trying to sell it as a straightforward copyright question, and I care about whether you're asking for legal advice, because that's against the forum rules. I also care that when people didn't want to ask your question because it's weird and skirts asking for legal advice, you were an ass in response.

[03152016]

i'm sure the legal experts in the lounge can clear this issue right up for OP