Exactly.Dr.Zer0 wrote:Nulli Secundus wrote:I do not get these questions.
Is there a method of studying for LSAT for exactly X score? Just study for the exam in the way that fits you, "be your best self" (heh) on exam day and kill the exam.
I interpret these questions not as how much do I study to get xyz score, but more like what score is the bare minimum I should settle for. In this case I would say its 165. As in don't take the LSAT until you are hitting 165+ on your PTs and if you get below 165 then consider retaking.
URM Harvard/Yale Forum
- Atmosphere
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:34 pm
Re: URM Harvard/Yale
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
Re: URM Harvard/Yale
if he had said 175 id aim for lower schools, but by finding out i can get some money at CCN, with a 170 (which seems realistic) its extra motivation. 170 is only -10, which shouldnt be too hard if i can start getting 0/-1 on LG, and if i can improve LR and RC timingAtmosphere wrote:Exactly.Dr.Zer0 wrote:Nulli Secundus wrote:I do not get these questions.
Is there a method of studying for LSAT for exactly X score? Just study for the exam in the way that fits you, "be your best self" (heh) on exam day and kill the exam.
I interpret these questions not as how much do I study to get xyz score, but more like what score is the bare minimum I should settle for. In this case I would say its 165. As in don't take the LSAT until you are hitting 165+ on your PTs and if you get below 165 then consider retaking.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login