URM Harvard/Yale Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar
Atmosphere

Silver
Posts: 558
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:34 pm

Re: URM Harvard/Yale

Post by Atmosphere » Tue Jun 10, 2014 5:26 pm

Dr.Zer0 wrote:
Nulli Secundus wrote:I do not get these questions.

Is there a method of studying for LSAT for exactly X score? Just study for the exam in the way that fits you, "be your best self" (heh) on exam day and kill the exam.

I interpret these questions not as how much do I study to get xyz score, but more like what score is the bare minimum I should settle for. In this case I would say its 165. As in don't take the LSAT until you are hitting 165+ on your PTs and if you get below 165 then consider retaking.
Exactly.

WeeBey

Silver
Posts: 547
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm

Re: URM Harvard/Yale

Post by WeeBey » Tue Jun 10, 2014 11:42 pm

Atmosphere wrote:
Dr.Zer0 wrote:
Nulli Secundus wrote:I do not get these questions.

Is there a method of studying for LSAT for exactly X score? Just study for the exam in the way that fits you, "be your best self" (heh) on exam day and kill the exam.

I interpret these questions not as how much do I study to get xyz score, but more like what score is the bare minimum I should settle for. In this case I would say its 165. As in don't take the LSAT until you are hitting 165+ on your PTs and if you get below 165 then consider retaking.
Exactly.
if he had said 175 id aim for lower schools, but by finding out i can get some money at CCN, with a 170 (which seems realistic) its extra motivation. 170 is only -10, which shouldnt be too hard if i can start getting 0/-1 on LG, and if i can improve LR and RC timing

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”