151 -> 167 (Real LSAC Administered Tests) - Taking Questions Forum

[062914123]

.

[mindarmed]

Also, if you think you need help with Logic Games, I offer one on one tutoring/coaching over phone/skype exclusively for the logic games section. For more info: http://www.LogicGamesTutoring.com

[Pneumonia]

OP how is it that you have been a member here for 3 1/2 years and yet failed to anticipate that there would be a negative reaction to your website/avatar/AMA? Also, if you were still prepping for the LSAT would you pay $100 an hour to someone with a 167 who went -4 on LG?

[NoodleyOne]

Also, if you think you need help with Logic Games, I offer one on one tutoring/coaching over phone/skype exclusively for the logic games section. For more info:

That website is golden.

If it is in fact real then problem with OP trying to make a buck, but TLS probably isn't the best place for a 167'er that went -4 on LG to advertise tutoring services. It's easy to find people who did lots better charging significantly less.

After looking over the website more this seems to pretty obviously be a troll.

Shit, I'll help on Logic Games over Skype. Pay me, bitches!

[ZGr88n]

I'm just curious as to how rare it is to see this big of a jump in scores; I guess I assumed it was quite common since I went from a 151 (untimed!) to a legit 167 without doing that much prep at all. Is it really that rare to see a big jump?

[062914123]

.

[ZGr88n]

OTOH, there are plenty of people out there (tons from my UG) that won't be lurking on forums like this, who will study like the LSAT is a UG class, gain a few points, and call it a day *shrug*

+1
I'm currently in a class that is nothing but LSAT prep, and find this to be very common; honestly I can't wrap my mind around it.

[Balthy]

Usually I don't care to find out whether someone is trolling or not, but this thread really annoys me.

[Pneumonia]

OP's link has been deleted. Good for the naive. Bad for future viewers that will miss out on the lolz.