RC-LR-LR-LR-LG Forum
- LionelHutzJD
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
So many MP questions that for the first time they were actually a little challenging.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:54 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
LR was tough this time around, a couple of really tricky necessary assumptions with convoluted language (i'm hoping that section was experimental)...and a wierd game with voicemails and websites, seriously who advertises with voicemails anyway? The girl behind me was crying with her head in her hands after the test, guess nobody told her she can cancel...
- teiswei
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Advertise? I thought it was about scheduling?pwnyc127 wrote:LR was tough this time around, a couple of really tricky necessary assumptions with convoluted language (i'm hoping that section was experimental)...and a wierd game with voicemails and websites, seriously who advertises with voicemails anyway? The girl behind me was crying with her head in her hands after the test, guess nobody told her she can cancel...
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:26 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
so the last LR section was that real or not? I can't remember if it had 25 or 26 but it didn't look like anything I'd practiced. I hope it was exp.elliottwarner wrote:25, 26 were real. I had 2 RC, was Mexican Folk Music and Pin Theory/ Adam smith real?
- teiswei
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Probably real... They threw in some new question wording. Just convoluted crap.e_mac7 wrote:so the last LR section was that real or not? I can't remember if it had 25 or 26 but it didn't look like anything I'd practiced. I hope it was exp.elliottwarner wrote:25, 26 were real. I had 2 RC, was Mexican Folk Music and Pin Theory/ Adam smith real?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Funkycrime
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:31 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
What do you guys mean by 1-1? Not familiar with this designation.
- LionelHutzJD
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I'm drunk. I bombed RC. WHYYYY. Fuck my stupid life.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:26 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Well here's to hoping for the best. Good luck everyone!teiswei wrote:Probably real... They threw in some new question wording. Just convoluted crap.e_mac7 wrote:so the last LR section was that real or not? I can't remember if it had 25 or 26 but it didn't look like anything I'd practiced. I hope it was exp.elliottwarner wrote:25, 26 were real. I had 2 RC, was Mexican Folk Music and Pin Theory/ Adam smith real?
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 11:18 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I can't remember but I do recall it having like 3 letters too and then the days thing.cynthiad wrote:voicemail? idk if it was a type. I've never seen one like it.MissJenna wrote:Can someone please tell me what type of game the 3rd one was? I couldn't believe how lost I was.(((( Given how much it stressed me out....I can't even remember details of it!! Arghhhh!!! I was something 1 day, 2 days and 3 days.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:24 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Hey guys, for those of you that took october's LSAT, how did this test felt?
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Hello,
I'm pretty sure my FIRST LR was experimental (section 2).
It had two questions that each shared the same prompt and only had 24 questions.
AND
Can anyone confirm this?
It had one question that was WORD FOR WORD (97% sure) the same as a question from a previously adminstered test. It also, if I'm right, had the same answer (obviously?).
I'm pretty sure my FIRST LR was experimental (section 2).
It had two questions that each shared the same prompt and only had 24 questions.
AND
Can anyone confirm this?
It had one question that was WORD FOR WORD (97% sure) the same as a question from a previously adminstered test. It also, if I'm right, had the same answer (obviously?).
- chem!
- Posts: 9573
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:03 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I didn't have two questions that shared a prompt and I have no idea about the second situation.gerrand wrote:Hello,
I'm pretty sure my FIRST LR was experimental (section 2).
It had two questions that each shared the same prompt and only had 24 questions.
AND
Can anyone confirm this?
It had one question that was WORD FOR WORD (97% sure) the same as a question from a previously adminstered test. It also, if I'm right, had the same answer (obviously?).
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:32 pm
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Has anyone made any progress figuring out which section was experimental? I had 25-26-25 and do not recall any 90s-style stimuli with two questions. I know the one with 26 questions was scored (all test takers had a section with 26 questions) but have no clue about the others. Thanks!
-
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:14 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I had 26-26-25. One thing I do remember is having an evaluate the argument question on the last two LR sections, didn't have one on the first.Goodman wrote:Has anyone made any progress figuring out which section was experimental? I had 25-26-25 and do not recall any 90s-style stimuli with two questions. I know the one with 26 questions was scored (all test takers had a section with 26 questions) but have no clue about the others. Thanks!
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:44 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I also had this test order. Can someone please tell me the theme of each Logic Game? I know the first had to do with morning/night, but can't remember the rest. I'm trying to look back over my performance, but my lack of memory is not helping.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
WallstreetRebel wrote:I also had this test order. Can someone please tell me the theme of each Logic Game? I know the first had to do with morning/night, but can't remember the rest. I'm trying to look back over my performance, but my lack of memory is not helping.
3rd involved voice mails and web advertisements.
I can't recall the placement of any of the question types or subjects. Nerves made it all a blur. Guess I won't know till the scores are released....Spartan_Alum_12 wrote:I had 26-26-25. One thing I do remember is having an evaluate the argument question on the last two LR sections, didn't have one on the first.Goodman wrote:Has anyone made any progress figuring out which section was experimental? I had 25-26-25 and do not recall any 90s-style stimuli with two questions. I know the one with 26 questions was scored (all test takers had a section with 26 questions) but have no clue about the others. Thanks!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- LionelHutzJD
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I do remember an evaluate the argument question regarding the ugly breed of dog "cocker spaniel" pretty sure I got that right as I remember it clearly (even the answer choice)
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I had 26-26-25 LR. For anyone who had this order, does anyone remember a lot of parallel flaw questions in one section? (Like a ridiculous amount--perhaps as many as 4-5). That's all I remember but everything is a blur. I believe my first 26 question section was the experimental, but I'm not sure. I also remember a question about poodles, one about asteroids, blinds/curtains, furry fish, and something about vitamin c and cancer
- chem!
- Posts: 9573
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:03 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
There was definitely an abundance of parallel questions in one section.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I think I had this setup too, although my test went LG LR LR RC LR. My first section had a lot of convoluted language that wasn't consistent with what I'd seen before, which led me to believe it might be the experimental (I hope. The last time I thought this way on the LSAT I turned out to be right). My second LR section seemed easy-standard and my last LR section seemed standard. Not knowing which section didn't count is freaking me out though, because I bombed that first LR section so hard. Also I remember all of the questions you named except for the blinds and curtains, but I think I might just be forgetting that one.cbarlow1016 wrote:I had 26-26-25 LR. For anyone who had this order, does anyone remember a lot of parallel flaw questions in one section? (Like a ridiculous amount--perhaps as many as 4-5). That's all I remember but everything is a blur. I believe my first 26 question section was the experimental, but I'm not sure. I also remember a question about poodles, one about asteroids, blinds/curtains, furry fish, and something about vitamin c and cancer
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login