Quick Conditional Inference Question Forum

[Captain Rodeo]

Wow! So I'm just seeing these all now. Just got done at work. Will definitely be reading this in the AM.

@nmop_apisdn- I did read your first reply (the first part). Thank you for being considerate- I know that it's tough for text comments to accurately represent our expressions and what we're trying to get across- so no worries. And thank you very much for your detailed response.

Will be reading it over coffee tomorrow morning.

[Cerebro]

Well, this is embarrassing.

[Captain Rodeo]

Hey, nmop_apisdn, thank you for all of the responses. Ya, I've come across a few AC's in some PTs (like 45-1-25, (B)) where that is a valid form. I think I read it before on LSATBlog. Hope studies are going well!