June 2011 LR Forum

[cvntstscrty]

LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL June 2011 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

[gggrra]

I had LR LG LR LR RC, i thought the first LR was pretty easy so im hoping it wasn't the exp. the second LR i had trouble with and felt was harder than average, third LR was ok

I had the same format, and I'm pretty sure that the second LR (with 24 questions) was experimental. I thought for sure it would've been the first one since it was so easy, but then the test would only have 100 questions (plus people here who had another experimental said that their LRs were 25 and 26 Qs).

yea the 24 should be exp. I had two 25 question LRs but luckily both were cake...

[omninode]

Seems like LR sections keep getting easier. Today the first one was so easy I though it was experimental. It wasn't.

Maybe LSAC is neglecting LR as they focus on developing LG and RC?

[lakers3peat]

i had LR1, 3rd, after logic games... I was so bummed out about how I did on logic games, I can't I even tried my best on the 1st LR.... after the break I chilled out a little bit and then for the 2nd LR, which I had 5th, I was determined to show myself I could do well on LR so I did my best. consequently, I feel like the 2nd LR was way easier then the 1st, but I wasn't even challenging myself to do my best on the 1st LR which is a total mental break down on my part...

[mchuynh]

LR-LG-LR-LR-RC

I didn't have enough time to finish the first LR :/ so i guessed on a few... but i had extra time for the third one..

[Quan292]

I had the LR-LG-LR -break-LR-RC type test so was the first or second LR section exp? I didnt get to 1q on the second one but the first like 6 qs on the first LR I was super distracted because my proctor and a dude who got kicked out of the test was freaking arguing! I was so tight.

[mchuynh]

deleted

[Yeshia90]

whoops, wrong thread.

[Strange]

I had LR 1 - 26 LR2- 24 LR3 - 26... which one was exp?

[Diiizzzzoooo]

I had LR 1 - 26 LR2- 24 LR3 - 26... which one was exp?

???

I had two LR and they were 25 and 26.

[Strange]

I had LR 1 - 26 LR2- 24 LR3 - 26... which one was exp?

???

I had two LR and they were 25 and 26.

I could have sworn I had 26 24 and 26... maybe I'm remembering it wrong.

[FarewellLsat]

Maybe I'm a bit odd...I think the longer LR section was easier. But maybe I was just very happy to be almost done with the stupid test...or just had really bad nerves in the beginning to be objective.

[cnyltiak]

Thought it was pretty easy, the 2nd one was my last section though and the last 3-4 questions I just couldn't focus on so we'll see.

[Giraffe]

LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL June 2011 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

Holy F*CK! We got it! but GUESS WAT? We ALL have been discussing the damn test on all the possible and impossible boards, PMs, and in the chat rooms. We even had a fucking conference call just an hour ago. EVERYONE who is on this board was present! then, like all of the above wasnt enough we had a video conference meet-and-confer where it was decided to have a meet-and-greet-June-2011-LSAT orgy this Wed, at 2:45:33 pm in Cockaigne with afterparty in Valhalla (go google it!) Complimentary condoms, lsat handouts and drinks! RSVP

We will send you a post card.

[chasy_price]

LR-LG-LR-LR-RC here

RC BOMED.

I had a bit rush over the 2 LRs. I keep getting lost in time.

Anyway RC was just awful.

[pkrtbx]

easyHARD

[mooseman2216]

Thought it was pretty easy, the 2nd one was my last section though and the last 3-4 questions I just couldn't focus on so we'll see.

word. i was so happy to be turning my book to the last page of the test..... and then i saw a wall of words. it was sad.

[whipy]

I had LR 1 - 26 LR2- 24 LR3 - 26... which one was exp?

???

I had two LR and they were 25 and 26.

Anyone know for sure which was experimental? Any key words were in the experimental LR that would help to identify it?

Actually, if someone who had just 2xLR would post key words from any questions (nothing illegal, just subject hints) from those two we could identify the experimental by elimination. Chopin has been bandied around so much that it is clear that this was the REAL RC, but nothing that helps to identify the 2 real LR sections.... I don't remember how many Qs in each of 3 LR sections so I cannot even use that to narrow it down to 2 of them. I've seen 'the cop question' mentioned on a few posts, but nothing else.

[seancris]

easyHARD

This.

[cnyltiak]

Thought it was pretty easy, the 2nd one was my last section though and the last 3-4 questions I just couldn't focus on so we'll see.

word. i was so happy to be turning my book to the last page of the test..... and then i saw a wall of words. it was sad.

yes my fatigue was definitely compounded by the fact that the last page of questions/answers were much longer than previous ones had been... I think it was intentional on LSACs part and I hate them for this.