I had only two LRs, one with 26, one with 25, so couldn't have been 25/25.EvanC wrote:Confirmed:
Had LR, RC, LR, LR, LG
Real LRs had 25 each, Snow Plows was real LG, RC had UNESCO.
I'm feeling anywhere between 163-172. Feeling amazing compared to December. Seriously.
Guessing Curve is 11 to 13 and 13 is a stretch.
Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread Forum
-
ExpectLess

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 3:12 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
-
Prime12

- Posts: 112
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:59 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
[quote="applepiecrust"][quote="EvanC"]Confirmed:
Real LRs had 25 each
?? That cant be true. I only had 2 LRs and one of them was 26.
Real LRs had 25 each
?? That cant be true. I only had 2 LRs and one of them was 26.
- EvanC

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Anyone confirm this? I'm going by what someone at the testing center told me.ExpectLess wrote:I had only two LRs, one with 26, one with 25, so couldn't have been 25/25.EvanC wrote:Confirmed:
Had LR, RC, LR, LR, LG
Real LRs had 25 each, Snow Plows was real LG, RC had UNESCO.
I'm feeling anywhere between 163-172. Feeling amazing compared to December. Seriously.
Guessing Curve is 11 to 13 and 13 is a stretch.
EDIT:
Confirmed:
Had LR, RC, LR, LR, LG
LRs were 25 and 26, Snow Plows was real LG, RC had UNESCO.
I'm feeling anywhere between 163-172. Feeling amazing compared to December. Seriously.
Guessing Curve is 11 to 13 and 13 is a stretch even though it was another 102 question test. Putting money on 12 curve.
Last edited by EvanC on Sat Feb 12, 2011 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- paul34

- Posts: 315
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
MOD EDIT: You've been warned about this shit.
Last edited by paul34 on Sat Feb 12, 2011 3:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- JazzOne

- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Just messing with you because of the typos.EvanC wrote:East Coast. I've been out for like an hour and a half.JazzOne wrote:Are you posting on your phone right outside the test center?EvanC wrote:Yeah, but I think I might have done alright. I finished in timeunlike december where i guessed on nlike the last 6.m3taphysician wrote:Anyone else find the RC to be especially difficult?
- EvanC

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I thought LG was ridiculously easy except games 2 and 3 took a little too much time so I had 5 min left on the last game which TADA! was the easiest and I ended up having to guess on like 4. Gave educated guesses on 2 or 3 total. I was pissed that I didn't really look ahead and just did it in order. Snow plows was annoying.
-
SchopenhauerFTW

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Q. Reaction upon turning to the LG section after taking the test in December?
A.
A.

- EvanC

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Seriously. This LG was a cakewalk compared to December. I was so happy working through it as my last section too instead of having back-to-back LG 3 and 4 like last time.SchopenhauerFTW wrote:Q. Reaction upon turning to the LG section after taking the test in December?
A.
-
hahatoplawmods

- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:14 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
soo the second lg after the break was real?m??? fmllllllll
-
kob

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:06 am
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
last games section was the real one...
I had LR RC LR LR LG, no clue which one was experimental! thought LG was more work than usual...
I had LR RC LR LR LG, no clue which one was experimental! thought LG was more work than usual...
- EvanC

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
A second LG or RC after break will always be a real going by the past LSAT administrations.hahatoplawmods wrote:soo the second lg after the break was real?m??? fmllllllll
Second LR was experimental... which sucks because it was EASY.kob wrote: last games section was the real one...
I had LR RC LR LR LG, no clue which one was experimental! thought LG was more work than usual...
-
mj23

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 6:19 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I miswrote a rule on snow plows, which really fucked me up. Think I missed maybe -6/7 on that one. FML
-
fdr123

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:23 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
How many ?s were on snow plow
-
darwin3

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:51 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I had RC, LR, RC, LG, LR...anyone know which RC was real?
I'm praying it's the 1st
I'm praying it's the 1st
-
m3taphysician

- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:25 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I was in the exact same situation. I also was praying it was the first one... the real one had UNESCOdarwin3 wrote:I had RC, LR, RC, LG, LR...anyone know which RC was real?
I'm praying it's the 1st
- EvanC

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
UNESCO was real. Underwater Culturalism or whatever.darwin3 wrote:I had RC, LR, RC, LG, LR...anyone know which RC was real?
I'm praying it's the 1st
-
fdr123

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:23 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Which was experimental. LR RC LR LR LG
- EvanC

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Also, I'll agree that RC was pretty hard this time but I don't think it was as confusing as dental caries etc... I got -10 last time on RC so here's to hoping I did better. Got a 159 and December and was pissed (scoring upper 160s on PTs).
- EvanC

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
1st page. Second LR.fdr123 wrote:Which was experimental. LR RC LR LR LG
-
m3taphysician

- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:25 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I consistently do fairly well in RC (1-4 wrong per), but this one killed me. I'm very uncertain about it.
-
fdr123

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:23 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
How u know it was 1st page. 2nd LR?
-
SchopenhauerFTW

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
Goddammit. So we all nailed our experimental sections. What else is new?
- EvanC

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I had same order. First LR was 26 questions. It was real. Just read the thread.
- EvanC

- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
I'm retaking in June but I really think I could have scored anywhere between 163 and 172-ish. It all depends on RC and the 26 question LR.
-
darwin3

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:51 pm
Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread
m3taphysician wrote:I was in the exact same situation. I also was praying it was the first one... the real one had UNESCOdarwin3 wrote:I had RC, LR, RC, LG, LR...anyone know which RC was real?
I'm praying it's the 1st
drats...was this the curing malaria w/ tree bark one too?