The December 2010 LG section made me want to... Forum
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:57 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
I became irrationally angry with the proctor after he announced five minutes left (at which point I was already in full-blown panic attack, and was essentially useless for the rest of the test anyway), and when he said that we couldn't leave until after the full writing section was over, I nearly stood up and accused him of false imprisonment.
I didn't, thankfully. But still, every part of my soul wanted to run out of that room, and it's hard to express how annoyed I was having to write about the Wangs and their stupid child care when I was almost positive I was cancelling the test.
I didn't, thankfully. But still, every part of my soul wanted to run out of that room, and it's hard to express how annoyed I was having to write about the Wangs and their stupid child care when I was almost positive I was cancelling the test.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:34 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
wrong thread
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:13 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
OK, got it. Thanks for the run-down buddy cuz I'm in the same boat as you, deff a hard LG section. We'll see. Wish ya the best of luck, hopefully we did well and neither of us have to take the GRE, but now I know that's an option ;PChiCubs14 wrote:Arturo wrote:BlueFeathers wrote:Yep.ChiCubs14 wrote:made me think about the GRE
I don't get this "think about the GRE," is that because the GRE is suppose to be easier? Sry, i've never opened a GRE book but I may have to consider it after this test. Lol. Leme know, serious Q cuz I don't get this reference ;P
My statement meant that I'm failing at this section in the LSAT and that could cause me potentially not do well on this LSAT test all-together so the GRE might be a better option...The GRE does not have a section similar to LG's so in my case it probably will be easier if I need to take it...
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:13 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
/| = Respect LSAC!! = |\
| God save the queen |
| God save the queen |
Last edited by Arturo on Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
Yeah I did, though I had less than a minute to spare.Arturo wrote:It was harsh... I'm glad to see others agree because maybe the curve will reflect it.
Anyone actually finish them all w/o guessing on any?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:13 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
/| = Respect LSAC!! = |\
| God save the queen |
| God save the queen |
Last edited by Arturo on Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:13 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
I just want January 10 to be here already lol. Oh well... score before new years? Anyone think so?
- 2011L1
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:33 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
Maybe its me, but I thought the LG's were fair and expected from Oct test. I took June test and mulch game was a nightmare! there were just a bunch of conditionals on the stained glass game. I took Binary solutions in NYC and Eva is a Gem!
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:51 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
...take the GMAT. The Critical Reasoning is a piece of friggin' cake after having studied Logical Reasoning for hundreds of hours.
- joebloe
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:02 am
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
THIS.Longhorn88 wrote:...3) made me want to lobby for tort reform just to get back at the LSAC.
- kkklick
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:33 pm
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:45 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
...wonder why I re-took a 169.
But hey, when years from now young LSATers are talking about that legendarily hard Dec. 10' LG section, we can gloat about it like Andy Rooney on the Great Depression.
But hey, when years from now young LSATers are talking about that legendarily hard Dec. 10' LG section, we can gloat about it like Andy Rooney on the Great Depression.
-
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:50 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
Arturo wrote:SageD wrote:I didn't, thankfully. But still, every part of my soul wanted to run out of that room, and it's hard to express how annoyed I was having to write about the Wangs and their stupid child care when I was almost positive I was cancelling the test.
F*ck the Wangs, and F*ck their 12 year old child! Haha! jk no dude, most of us bombed that. I blanked man, I guessed on 7-8, full out guesses. 2-3, educated guessed. Unless you were shooting for over a mid 160 I don't think its the end of the world, how many you guess on? We just gotta hope we guessed right buddy. I've had some lucky guesses before and allz I know is I am not retaking that test every again!
Plus, don't forget, they'll likely curve to compensate everyone elses difficulties there. I know it wasn't just me, the moment I left I knew I couldn't have been the only one who struggled that one. It was just difficult, I've taken 50+ PT and that one was really one of the worst. Two extremely hard games in one section. Gotta be some curve to consider.
EDIT: But you better have rocked 1+4
The Wangs kid was 10, not 12.

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- nathan.
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 3:23 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
start a new relationship wit' chuuufreon wrote:leave the one I'm with
-
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm
- joebloe
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:02 am
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
Not that I recall. I think you might've been hallucinating during the WS. In at Berkeley.SchopenhauerFTW wrote:Weren't there two kids who were 12 years old?SupraVln180 wrote:Arturo wrote:SageD wrote:I didn't, thankfully. But still, every part of my soul wanted to run out of that room, and it's hard to express how annoyed I was having to write about the Wangs and their stupid child care when I was almost positive I was cancelling the test.
F*ck the Wangs, and F*ck their 12 year old child! Haha! jk no dude, most of us bombed that. I blanked man, I guessed on 7-8, full out guesses. 2-3, educated guessed. Unless you were shooting for over a mid 160 I don't think its the end of the world, how many you guess on? We just gotta hope we guessed right buddy. I've had some lucky guesses before and allz I know is I am not retaking that test every again!
Plus, don't forget, they'll likely curve to compensate everyone elses difficulties there. I know it wasn't just me, the moment I left I knew I couldn't have been the only one who struggled that one. It was just difficult, I've taken 50+ PT and that one was really one of the worst. Two extremely hard games in one section. Gotta be some curve to consider.
EDIT: But you better have rocked 1+4
The Wangs kid was 10, not 12.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:57 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
The kid was 10 for me, too.
I wrote 750-1000 words about why the Wangs would best be served by driving their child out into the woods, and leaving him/her there, armed only with a one-gallon Ziploc bag filled with approved supplies, an analog wrist watch, and a snack, to survive in the wilderness and fight off bears.
a) Accommodating to the Wangs' work schedule? Check.
b) Providing the Wangs' child with a variety of experiences not found in the traditional school setting? Check.
c) Approximating for the Wangs' child how I felt taking the December '10 LSAT logic games section? Check.
I wrote 750-1000 words about why the Wangs would best be served by driving their child out into the woods, and leaving him/her there, armed only with a one-gallon Ziploc bag filled with approved supplies, an analog wrist watch, and a snack, to survive in the wilderness and fight off bears.
a) Accommodating to the Wangs' work schedule? Check.
b) Providing the Wangs' child with a variety of experiences not found in the traditional school setting? Check.
c) Approximating for the Wangs' child how I felt taking the December '10 LSAT logic games section? Check.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:28 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
atresia wrote:

-
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
Hey, don't look at me. I smashed the window.LawPlz wrote:FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.jpg
- Rawlberto
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:43 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
The October games were a joke. Mulch only tripped me up for a second until I realized I only needed to use one tier. I knew they would compensate, but this was ridiculous.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Cmoss
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
+1ccmbr006 wrote:I had LR RC LR LR LG
Well, when I first finished it, I spent the first five minutes of the writing sample staring at my desk. I had rocked the other sections, and I was utterly confused as to how the LG was so shitty.
Then I thought of the different Dante-esque torments that await the LSAC employees in hell.
And then, I felt pretty good when I realized that everyone thought LG sucked.
But I learned that the LR that I had bombed thinking it was the experimental was real.
And that sucked.
Please I hope the first LR is the experimental
-
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:13 pm
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
/| = Respect LSAC!! = |\
| God save the queen |
| God save the queen |
Last edited by Arturo on Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
- hokie
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:32 am
Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...
made me want to be like "WTF?? FML." and walk out..........
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login