inmans wrote:"It's a bad idea unless you actually need it"
Wait a second... who is qualified to determine if an individual "needs" it?
"The question is, how do you perform on the LSAT while taking adderall. A medical professional is unqualified to give a meaningful opinion on that"
A medical professional is unqualified to give an opinion on how adderall affects cognitive performance? Right.
If a psychiatrist legitimately thinks that an individual qualifies for a prescription (that is, has "adhd"), then it's likely that the drug will have positive effects (be that on the LSAT, in the workplace, etc.).
I like how you took an incomplete quote of what I said to challenge what I said. What I said is true, because I seriously doubt any medical professional is intimately familiar with the LSAT. They don't know what types of questions are being asked or how you would solve them. Most have simply never even looked at one. Their opinion would be useless. Do you think they'd be able to predict how it would impact your score in each section? If you ask a medical professional, he isn't going to say "It may increase your RC by increasing your focus, but may decrease your LG and LR scores because it reduces analytical processing abilities." He's going to say something generic that may be valuable, but doesn't give anyone concrete advice as far as the LSAT goes. That was my only point and I'm surprised I actually have to defend what is a blatantly obvious conclusion.
And you are correct. I wouldn't recommend Adderall for those who do not have a prescription. A medical professional is qualified to say who "needs" Adderall. They don't base prescriptions off LSAT performance, they base it off of diagnosable medical conditions, which they are amply qualified to speak to. If prescribed, it is treating a condition to bring you to par with those not afflicted, and should probably be taken.