PDFs out! Forum

[ND'10]

-Got a -3 on the last logic game, missed all 3 questions I had to guess because I ran out of time. Had gotten 6 straight -0 sub-30 minute LG sections.

-Missed the last 3 questions on the test. Knowing that getting 0/3 or 2/3 on those last 3 questions is the difference between my score (168) and my goal (170, also the median of UVa, GTown, Duke, etc) is killing me.

-Also, the Shakespeare question officially becomes the easiest question to ever merit multiple multiple-page threads. I didn't even blink on that question on the test then come home and everyone is talking about how hard it was and I was having Shakespeare related nightmares over the last few weeks thinking I mis-read a question in the first 5.

[enkisdom]

-2 on LG, different games. A rule substitution question and a must include question. I never really got the hang of the rule subs, and since I got -0 on the rest of the test, I'll never have to.

[Nonok]

-2 on LG, different games. A rule substitution question and a must include question. I never really got the hang of the rule subs, and since I got -0 on the rest of the test, I'll never have to.

You got 180? Congrats.

[plenipotentiary]

-8LR -0LG -0RC

DAMMIT! I went -0 on the experimental LR! Can I have that one instead?? Damn it...

How do you know how you did on the experimental? They don't release it.

[zarabenjamin]

can someone please help me? my writing sample and the "item response report" are the only PDFs up. The IRR says my score but where I should see "my response" and "credited response" the whole table is blank. Do I have to wait for the answer sheet and disclosure book to be available before I can see which ones and how many questions I got wrong?

[captainslow]

-8LR -0LG -0RC

DAMMIT! I went -0 on the experimental LR! Can I have that one instead?? Damn it...

How do you know how you did on the experimental? They don't release it.

I'm guessing here but I tore through it and went back through every single question. I've got no hesitations saying I aced it.

[micah0104]

-10 in RC FMLLLLLLLLL

I am with you, -9. I had RC first so i am really hoping that it was just because I was freaking out.

[xqhp82]

Does anyone have any problem opening the PDFs? I can't open any of them...they're in .aspx format

[JDWannabe]

I got a 160 (74 raw score)

-9 on LR: I'm very happy with this; I normally miss 10-11 total on PTs.
-8 on AR: I'm really bad at games, so I actually thought this would be a lot worse. Hopefully I can whittle this down to -5 or so by the June 2011 retake.
-10 on RC: WTF!?!? How did this happen??? I was averaging -5 to -7 in PTs. This was supposed to be my best section. If I had a halfway decent RC, I'd have close to a 165 (which I'd be really happy with).

[padthai]

-8LR -0LG -0RC

DAMMIT! I went -0 on the experimental LR! Can I have that one instead?? Damn it...

How do you know how many you got on the experimental? My PDF only shows my 4 scored sections.

[captainslow]

-8LR -0LG -0RC

DAMMIT! I went -0 on the experimental LR! Can I have that one instead?? Damn it...

How do you know how many you got on the experimental? My PDF only shows my 4 scored sections.

-8LR -0LG -0RC

DAMMIT! I went -0 on the experimental LR! Can I have that one instead?? Damn it...

How do you know how you did on the experimental? They don't release it.

I'm guessing here but I tore through it and went back through every single question. I've got no hesitations saying I aced it.

[McNulty]

Wow... is it just me or is that curve really really low? Brutal test.

[Hedwig]

Wow... is it just me or is that curve really really low? Brutal test.

It was a -12!

I do believe my original Harry Potter prediction held sway! 12 is the most prominent number in Harry Potter, obviously it would be my curve .

And guys, does anyone else's writing look like a fifth graders? I have really neat, nice printing, but in PDF format, I swear, it looks like a little kids.

[AverageTutoring]

Wow... is it just me or is that curve really really low? Brutal test.

-12? That's a fairly good curve. I dont like how -11 also garners you a 170. It would have been nice if it was a -12 with no other number.

Much better then the -10 or -9 some of us felt it might be.

[BeatenHorse]

Is there any chance we can get a screen of the conversion chart? I can't believe we saw so much disappointment last night and still saw a -12 curve.

[bartleby]

Wasn't it -11

[tranquil]

*

[Hedwig]

Wasn't it -11

You could get -11 or -12 and get a 170, thus making it a -12 because that's the most you could get wrong for a 170.

[Rawlberto]

Would anyone mind sending me a copy of the pdf? I didn't take the test, just interested in seeing it?

[catsparka]

Wow... is it just me or is that curve really really low? Brutal test.

It was a -12!

I do believe my original Harry Potter prediction held sway! 12 is the most prominent number in Harry Potter, obviously it would be my curve .

And guys, does anyone else's writing look like a fifth graders? I have really neat, nice printing, but in PDF format, I swear, it looks like a little kids.

My handwriting looks about the same as it did when I was in second grade. Not sure why PDF-izing my writing sample had this much of a downgrading effect. It's legible still, but just looks really childish.

[McNulty]

Wow... is it just me or is that curve really really low? Brutal test.

-12? That's a fairly good curve. I dont like how -11 also garners you a 170. It would have been nice if it was a -12 with no other number.

Much better then the -10 or -9 some of us felt it might be.

I mean that the curve is helpful, but that means the test was pretty hard, yes?

[Hedwig]

Wow... is it just me or is that curve really really low? Brutal test.

It was a -12!

I do believe my original Harry Potter prediction held sway! 12 is the most prominent number in Harry Potter, obviously it would be my curve .

And guys, does anyone else's writing look like a fifth graders? I have really neat, nice printing, but in PDF format, I swear, it looks like a little kids.

My handwriting looks about the same as it did when I was in second grade. Not sure why PDF-izing my writing sample had this much of a downgrading effect. It's legible still, but just looks really childish.

Haha, okay, well, maybe it's just the PDFization that's making it look childish. Although, to be honest, I write big and very clearly/neatly so it does look a bit young. But I'd prefer that to a scrawl. I like my writing, so whatever, adcomms, you better like it too!

And reading over my writing sample, I lol'd at how Latin has affected my formal writing. I never say can/could but "is able [complementary infinitive]" is all over the place, haha. Just because I always translate something like possum narrare as I am able to narrate b/c in Latin it's the infinitive, haha.

[Shooter]

Wow... is it just me or is that curve really really low? Brutal test.

It was a -12!

I do believe my original Harry Potter prediction held sway! 12 is the most prominent number in Harry Potter, obviously it would be my curve .

And guys, does anyone else's writing look like a fifth graders? I have really neat, nice printing, but in PDF format, I swear, it looks like a little kids.

Lol, +1. Reading my writing sample was such a trip.

I look like a four year old scribbling wierd phrases such as "quantitative, objective inquiry."

[Redurgam]

Is there a reason why you guys can see your PDFs but I can't see mine? When I go to the LSAC website and go to LSAT ---> LSAT Status I see IRR and Writing Sample PDFs and that is it. There is no file for answer sheet, disclosure book and conversion table.

[Shooter]

Is there a reason why you guys can see your PDFs but I can't see mine? When I go to the LSAC website and go to LSAT ---> LSAT Status I see IRR and Writing Sample PDFs and that is it. There is no file for answer sheet, disclosure book and conversion table.

This happened to me when I took the test the first time. To this day it's never shown up. Tough luck.