Thanks.achilles wrote:our proctor told us not to, because it made the image that's sent to schools hard to read. she said to just cross it out instead. but since they probably won't read it anyway, it shouldn't matter

Thanks.achilles wrote:our proctor told us not to, because it made the image that's sent to schools hard to read. she said to just cross it out instead. but since they probably won't read it anyway, it shouldn't matter
Nah, you're good. Remember the 3 R's? Reading, Riting and Rithmetic.niederbomb wrote:Hahaha. Yeah, RS just came out because it looked like "PS." I guess it should have been "WS." I guess it matches my avatar and my home state.niederbomb wrote:
UVA says they take the RS seriously and compare it to the PS to see if the applicant really wrote his/her own PS.
Do they really? I don't know, but I'd rather not find out.
The Riting Section? Is this what you were getting at with the RS? I hope so.
Yeah. I mean, it's good to use counter premises, obviously... I just went a little crazy with them.sidhesadie wrote:Don't feel bad, eit.
I used "Although" far too many times.Probably in a similar manner to your use of "while".
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Ahaha I erased several times, and when I looked at my writing sample later on you couldn't tell AT ALL. LSAC is just being paranoid - like their discouraging faxed LORs because "often a faxed letter is not clear" or whatever.sidhesadie wrote:Yeah, they said the scanning equipment is sensitive and will often pick up erasures, leaving that part illegible.
I also wondered if it is just to see who can follow directions, LOL.
I didn't even know handwrite = cursive.eit wrote:My proctor also told us we should handwrite the Writing Sample because it said "write." Well, yes, it also said write the date...
It's not terrible if you don't handwrite the writing sample, right? My printing is very clear and neat and looks nice, my handwriting can be nice but wayyy more illegible.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
All I know is that writing section is NEVER experimental.lolol10 wrote:hey guys idk what you all put down for the writing sample. i hope thats the experimental section i was like caught up bigggggg timez on what to write. i felt like i was just in a shell game the entire time, second guessing myself. i might cancel now after that experience.....
i was joking.Ragged wrote:All I know is that writing section is NEVER experimental.lolol10 wrote:hey guys idk what you all put down for the writing sample. i hope thats the experimental section i was like caught up bigggggg timez on what to write. i felt like i was just in a shell game the entire time, second guessing myself. i might cancel now after that experience.....
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
nylost wrote:You are beautifuleit wrote:I think I used too many adversative clauses beginning with "while." Shoulda mixed it up a bit. Hard when you can't erase.
Lmfao... I wasn't going to say anything. :/Kobe_Teeth wrote:The Riting Section? Is this what you were getting at with the RS? I hope so.niederbomb wrote:UVA says they take the RS seriously and compare it to the PS to see if the applicant really wrote his/her own PS.
Do they really? I don't know, but I'd rather not find out.
you can absolutely erase; it just doesn't look so good on the scanCGI Fridays wrote:Ragged wrote:Yes, I did a few times anyway though.CGI Fridays wrote:Seriously folks, were we not supposed to erase?![]()
I only did it a few times as well, but what's the reasoning? Legibility after copying?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login