Yeah. You definitely should have skipped. This happened to me twice today (skipped a question and went back to it after finishing section) and both times I figured it out after returning.KevinP wrote:Fuck this LG.
I had LR LG RC LR LG.
I completely aced the first 4 sections but when the real LG (5th section) came, I completely froze up on the first game. And it was only one question that fucked me over. I should of just fucking skipped the one LG question that took me like 15 minutes. I'm always 0-1 on games. DAMN IT.
Die LG Forum
- 3|ink

- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Die LG
-
EK14

- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:04 pm
Re: Die LG
I usually consider LG to be one of my weaker sections, but i crushed the section 5 LG. I finished the first 3 games in 20 minutes. Finished 4th with 5 min to go, and review almost all my answers.. i thought the LR LG RC LR LG , is the most generous format, so lucky that i got it.
- incompetentia

- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: Die LG
I went into every section giving myself 150 seconds on each question. If I exceeded that limit, I skipped it and came back to it at the end.
Worked like a charm. Both LR sections I finished with less than two minutes to spare.
Worked like a charm. Both LR sections I finished with less than two minutes to spare.
-
tazmolover

- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm
Re: Die LG
I should have done this.incompetentia wrote:I went into every section giving myself 150 seconds on each question. If I exceeded that limit, I skipped it and came back to it at the end.
Worked like a charm. Both LR sections I finished with less than two minutes to spare.
For one LR section I thought I was good on time on the 12th question when I looked at the clock and boom...20 minutes had passed.
I freaked and I'm pretty sure I missed everything.
- Adjudicator

- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 am
Re: Die LG
Ha, I skipped the infamous brick house question, then ended up coming back to it at the end with like 7 minutes remaining and spending the whole 7 minutes working on it. And I still wasn't very confident in my answer.
-
tenpenny3

- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:33 pm
Re: Die LG
I shat my pants when I saw the copious amounts of free space for the 1st section of LG, i think it was game 3? When i realized it was a exp section I ended up being ok lol. overall, I didn't think the games were that bad, but not easy by any means.
-
ohlawl

- Posts: 59
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:39 pm
Re: Die LG
I actually felt really good about the LG section. I finished with 6 minutes remaining and went back over all my unsure answers. Now RC... I think I bombed that. 
- incompetentia

- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: Die LG
Was it just me that thought this question was not difficult?Adjudicator wrote:Ha, I skipped the infamous brick house question, then ended up coming back to it at the end with like 7 minutes remaining and spending the whole 7 minutes working on it. And I still wasn't very confident in my answer.
That of course means I probably got it wrong...
-
EK14

- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:04 pm
Re: Die LG
I usually consider LG to be one of my weaker sections, but i crushed the section 5 LG. I finished the first 3 games in 20 minutes. Finished 4th with 5 min to go, and review almost all my answers.. i thought the LR LG RC LR LG , is the most generous format, so lucky that i got it.
- Aro5389

- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:35 am
Re: Die LG
I had the same format, and yes, the 1st game was horsecrap. I knew I shoulda skipped it ASAP and by Q3 I finally did... wish they'd wait until at least Game 2 to give the hardest game.
-
JacobH

- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:04 pm
Re: Die LG
Nah, I didn't find it too difficult either. I think it's just the way people's brain work. Something that's obvious to everyone else can be torture to one person.incompetentia wrote:Was it just me that thought this question was not difficult?Adjudicator wrote:Ha, I skipped the infamous brick house question, then ended up coming back to it at the end with like 7 minutes remaining and spending the whole 7 minutes working on it. And I still wasn't very confident in my answer.
That of course means I probably got it wrong...
- 3|ink

- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Die LG
I wasn't. The moment I saw that, I realized -11 curve, MAXeve2490 wrote:I was very glad to see a pure sequencing game in section 5.
-
tazmolover

- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm
Re: Die LG
Wasn't there a pure sequencing game on PT60....with a -14 curve?3|ink wrote:I wasn't. The moment I saw that, I realized -11 curve, MAXeve2490 wrote:I was very glad to see a pure sequencing game in section 5.
- 3|ink

- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Die LG
It wasn't pure sequencing. It was a conditional sequencing.tazmolover wrote:Wasn't there a pure sequencing game on PT60....with a -14 curve?3|ink wrote:I wasn't. The moment I saw that, I realized -11 curve, MAXeve2490 wrote:I was very glad to see a pure sequencing game in section 5.
-
tazmolover

- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm
Re: Die LG
WELL FUCK MY DREAMS ARE GOING UP IN FLAMES3|ink wrote:It wasn't pure sequencing. It was a conditional sequencing.tazmolover wrote:Wasn't there a pure sequencing game on PT60....with a -14 curve?3|ink wrote:I wasn't. The moment I saw that, I realized -11 curve, MAXeve2490 wrote:I was very glad to see a pure sequencing game in section 5.
-
LogicGamez

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: Die LG
1st game required combination diagramming, like the dino game in June 09, but much easier. Once you got the diagram the questions were super obvious.
- oreo3405

- Posts: 217
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: Die LG
I second that exact sentence, had a ton of time to review and solidify my LG answers, the 4th passage in RC killed me.ohlawl wrote:I actually felt really good about the LG section. I finished with 6 minutes remaining and went back over all my unsure answers. Now RC... I think I bombed that.
-
policestate1234

- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:43 pm
Re: Die LG
Same..the 1st game took me 10 mins but I was able to build time on the second one in 5 mins.Adjudicator wrote:Yeah, I think the drivers game was the hardest for me, and game 2 was the easiest... I don't even remember what it was because I did it so fast.dingoesatmybaby wrote:ive come to the realization that the first game (the drivers) was the hardest. I spent about 13 minutes on it but Im fairly certain I got them all right. It was just so time consuming! AND FOR ONLY 5 QUESTIONS!! Although, I semi made up for it, by literally breezing through Game 2 in about 5 minutes. I dont know why I found it so easy, my setup made for some very helpful inferences and something about it just clicked. Game 3 took me about 9 or 10 minutes but once again Im fairly certain I got them all right. Then Section 4 was difficult, but I now Im thinking it was probably due to the fact that I ran out of time and didnt get to complete it.
-
tazmolover

- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm
Re: Die LG
I spent 9-10min on first game, so I kinda rushed through 2nd one, but I was pretty confident in my 3rd game, then had around 13 minutes left for game 4...which I needed every second of.policestate1234 wrote:Same..the 1st game took me 10 mins but I was able to build time on the second one in 5 mins.Adjudicator wrote:Yeah, I think the drivers game was the hardest for me, and game 2 was the easiest... I don't even remember what it was because I did it so fast.dingoesatmybaby wrote:ive come to the realization that the first game (the drivers) was the hardest. I spent about 13 minutes on it but Im fairly certain I got them all right. It was just so time consuming! AND FOR ONLY 5 QUESTIONS!! Although, I semi made up for it, by literally breezing through Game 2 in about 5 minutes. I dont know why I found it so easy, my setup made for some very helpful inferences and something about it just clicked. Game 3 took me about 9 or 10 minutes but once again Im fairly certain I got them all right. Then Section 4 was difficult, but I now Im thinking it was probably due to the fact that I ran out of time and didnt get to complete it.
- 3|ink

- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Die LG
How many times have you taken the LSAT?tazmolover wrote: WELL FUCK MY DREAMS ARE GOING UP IN FLAMES
-
tazmolover

- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm
Re: Die LG
First time.3|ink wrote:How many times have you taken the LSAT?tazmolover wrote: WELL FUCK MY DREAMS ARE GOING UP IN FLAMES
I think I would have been confident on this test...if it wasn't for 1 LR section...(which I BOMBED) Blind guessed 3+.
Anyways I'm a senior with a useless double major polsci/history and probably will fulfill my philosophy major requirement also.
Triple major but no job prospects. I was thinking of taking a year off since December LSAT will be late in the cycle and I probably won't get into my dream school of Cornell with my 3.7x (maybe 3.8x) lsac gpa...
So this test has got me feeling pretty down. Unless I score in my high PT range on december test and get into Cornell, I don't see myself going into law school next year...thus me working at 7/11.
-
lawfoolz

- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 12:32 am
Re: Die LG
what were the lg question types ie runners strict sequencing artifact? Drivers, nurses?
.
.
-
LogicGamez

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: Die LG
Pretty sure a 3.7 won't hold you back to Cornell.Triple major but no job prospects. I was thinking of taking a year off since December LSAT will be late in the cycle and I probably won't get into my dream school of Cornell with my 3.7x (maybe 3.8x) lsac gpa...
Stanford maybe, but not Cornell
-
JacobH

- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:04 pm
Re: Die LG
3.7x and not getting into Cornell WHAT!?tazmolover wrote:First time.3|ink wrote:How many times have you taken the LSAT?tazmolover wrote: WELL FUCK MY DREAMS ARE GOING UP IN FLAMES
I think I would have been confident on this test...if it wasn't for 1 LR section...(which I BOMBED) Blind guessed 3+.
Anyways I'm a senior with a useless double major polsci/history and probably will fulfill my philosophy major requirement also.
Triple major but no job prospects. I was thinking of taking a year off since December LSAT will be late in the cycle and I probably won't get into my dream school of Cornell with my 3.7x (maybe 3.8x) lsac gpa...
So this test has got me feeling pretty down. Unless I score in my high PT range on december test and get into Cornell, I don't see myself going into law school next year...thus me working at 7/11.
3.7x is way above their 75% isn't it? IIRC, their LSAT range is relatively low too.