Ragged will tell you your LSAT score (for June takers... ) Forum

[Ragged]

sweet.

FuMan got a 175+ because he needs some good news after Celtics lost and because he wants to go to Northwestern real bad.

[justinmcl]

This is good prep for the disastrous email that will be coming within the week...

[PlugInBaby]

{edit} and because she critiqued my PS, which prolly inspired her to study and make something of herself.

Truth. I felt like a slacker since I only speak 1.5 languages.

P.S. I went back to look at it to make sure I wasn't bitchy when I edited it. I got a nasty PM once from someone who said I was bitter and mean after I critiqued theirs! haha

Reserving Eskimo's services right now for my PS.

Our personal statements would be swapped around and spit on so much until it becomes a beautiful yet diseased work of art. Kind of like a porn star...another PS!

[Ragged]

Ragged is a winner.

If I made this my signature, would that look pretentious?

[Knock]

{edit} and because she critiqued my PS, which prolly inspired her to study and make something of herself.

Truth. I felt like a slacker since I only speak 1.5 languages.

P.S. I went back to look at it to make sure I wasn't bitchy when I edited it. I got a nasty PM once from someone who said I was bitter and mean after I critiqued theirs! haha

Reserving Eskimo's services right now for my PS.

Our personal statements would be swapped around and spit on so much until it becomes a beautiful yet diseased work of art. Kind of like a porn star...another PS!

Hahahahaha......too bad I don't even know what i'm going to write about yet ugh. Just gonna be another lame character sketch I guess.

[justinmcl]

Languages would be good to discuss on PS? Would anyone care that I can read Latin and am working on Ancient Greek?

[kk19131]

[PlugInBaby]

ITT: Goodbye bitter pessimism...hello cloying optimism!

Nonsequitur: I <3 Blonde Redhead

[Knock]

Languages would be good to discuss on PS? Would anyone care that I can read Latin and am working on Ancient Greek?

Idk, I feel like you would have to tie it into something else.

[FuManChusco]

sweet.

FuMan got a 175+ because he needs some good news after Celtics lost and because he wants to go to Northwestern real bad.

ain't that --ImageRemoved--

[PlugInBaby]

Languages would be good to discuss on PS? Would anyone care that I can read Latin and am working on Ancient Greek?

Idk, I feel like you would have to tie it into something else.

This is most likely the case. You would have to tie it into why you are going into law school as well as make it very interesting. If it is just an extrapolation of your resume let us see what Dean Savage would have to say.

--ImageRemoved--

[justinmcl]

Languages would be good to discuss on PS? Would anyone care that I can read Latin and am working on Ancient Greek?

Idk, I feel like you would have to tie it into something else.

This is most likely the case. You would have to tie it into why you are going into law school as well as make it very interesting. If it is just an extrapolation of your resume let us see what Dean Savage would have to say.

--ImageRemoved--

Figured as much, brief glimmer of hope for making myself seem interesting on my PS.... too bad I was not applying 50 years ago, when these things were still useful.

[Marionberry]

Edited: fuck it, I don't want to know.

[balzern]

Ill play

Avg PT 160 (Range 157-163) Last two PTs 165 and 168

Guessed on 1 game (4th game - 6 questions) and 5 RC questions, other than that everything seemed pretty normal.

[OrdinarilySkilled]

Lets see your skills as my info is limited
162 in sept 07
only took 3 PT - 171 170 174
decided to be a tough guy and took a bathroom break mid LG section (be4 4th game)

[greg11a]

Ill bite since I cant wait 2-5 more days for my score.

Feb '10 - 162 with minimal prep and had to guess on 6 LG ?'s

After feb did LG bible and about 50 preptests, averaging 168.

Guessed on 3 questions in LG(got the rest right though) and screwed up the following LR, which luckily was the experimental LR. Felt confident about everything else, especially the RC.

[GratefulDead]

yoo Ragged I'm trusting you to be spot on.

PT AVG: 170.5

LG: Guessed on one, kind of worried my PT score is dependent on getting 0,-1 every time, usually 0. I guessed on one figure I got -1,-2 on LG. =(. Got the first three sections perfect however
RC: Felt really good about the first 3, maybe even none wrong. The contingent fee one was a little tough for me maybe one or two wrong there.
LR: Typically my weakest section and unfortunately I had 3 sections of it. Had trouble with minivans and a few others, hoping to only lose 2-3 on each section, but def could be a few more =(.

Ragged be my LSAT soothsayer.

[artichoke]

Lets see your skills as my info is limited
162 in sept 07
only took 3 PT - 171 170 174
decided to be a tough guy and took a bathroom break mid LG section (be4 4th game)

I will never understand those who can't hold it for the sake of their future. You must have been pee-your-pants urgent to leave during the logic games.

[mpj_3050]

September 2009: 160, about 164 avg.
June 2010: about a 169-170 avg.

Just got an email from Regent University Law School - June 2010 LSAT score: 142

[bostonlawchick]

I'll throw my hat in the ring... it'll be nice to at least have a fake score to hang on to until we get the news later this week...

Cold diagnostic- 169

Low PT-164
High PT- 176

Last few before real thing- 168, 173, 174, 176, 173, 168, 176

Test day- felt pretty good, RC and LR felt better than usual... I don't remember any questions that I really struggled to answer (except underground rock bands... wtf!) I ran out of time on interns, had to guess on three, but I am usually -0 on games so I figure I got the rest of them right.

give me some hope

[3|ink]

I took 12 PTs and averaged 167. My score was consistently 167 until the last two weeks, when I started hitting 169-170 for two-three tests.

My best LR was -4 between the two
My best RC was -2
My best LG was -0

June test LR: -5 to -6
June test RC: -5 to -6
June test LG: -5 to -6

Define "fucked":

1. 3link
2. (censored)
3. (censored)

[1991]

Oops, nevermind, Ragged already told me the predicted score on my own thread. Thanks!!

[Ragged]

Why so angry, kk? I thought you'd be happy with anything above 145.

Ill play

Avg PT 160 (Range 157-163) Last two PTs 165 and 168

Guessed on 1 game (4th game - 6 questions) and 5 RC questions, other than that everything seemed pretty normal.

Guessing on all 6 questions of the fourth game shows real character. Solving every question... pffft... thats for losers who just have to try harder to do well. I'm sure you'll get atleast a 165+.

Lets see your skills as my info is limited
162 in sept 07
only took 3 PT - 171 170 174
decided to be a tough guy and took a bathroom break mid LG section (be4 4th game)

You sir, get the tip of my hat. Thats real skills people (and nothing Ordinary about it). Watch and learn. You got 170+ for having balls, if nothing else.

Ill bite since I cant wait 2-5 more days for my score.

Feb '10 - 162 with minimal prep and had to guess on 6 LG ?'s

After feb did LG bible and about 50 preptests, averaging 168.

Guessed on 3 questions in LG(got the rest right though) and screwed up the following LR, which luckily was the experimental LR. Felt confident about everything else, especially the RC.

Your story inspires confidance. 170 at atleast for you. I'd give my right arm to get atleast 2 correct on that last game.

yoo Ragged I'm trusting you to be spot on.

PT AVG: 170.5

LG: Guessed on one, kind of worried my PT score is dependent on getting 0,-1 every time, usually 0. I guessed on one figure I got -1,-2 on LG. =(. Got the first three sections perfect however
RC: Felt really good about the first 3, maybe even none wrong. The contingent fee one was a little tough for me maybe one or two wrong there.
LR: Typically my weakest section and unfortunately I had 3 sections of it. Had trouble with minivans and a few others, hoping to only lose 2-3 on each section, but def could be a few more =(.

Ragged be my LSAT soothsayer.

172, I'm feeling this.


I'll do the rest later. I need to regain my mana.

[Dr. Strangelove]

Diagnostic Test: 170
PT average: 173.5
Found this LSAT to be hard- I'm guessing I got a few wrong in LR & RC with a perfect LG.
I didn't have time to doublecheck my answers on RC.

[Chimica]

I'll bite

Cold diagnostic 160 (but it wasn't an actual LSAT test, it was stupidity McGraw Hill)
Studied a bit and took the June 2007-170-I was happy, as I had a month befor the test and my LG were the weakest section

After that
165, 167, 177 (compilation test-I pulled the LG from the easy, easy 40s, as I had already done the LG for that test) 166, 164

Based on that and bunches of seperate sections------>Never did get LG (-5 to -1 on timed tests), LR was OK (-3 on average) RC was awesome (-1/0) until I hit the 50's (-5/-6)

Test day LR-OK now that I know the experimental section (unsure on 5-8) LG-*SOB* messed up game 2 somehow-squint and guess on 4-8 questions, RC first three section were OK, last was impossible and rushed (5 minutes for whole thing...).

I was hoping for 170+, assumed I'd get 165+ and the whole thing felt like a 160.

Rewrite-here I come!