hennenr wrote:By Top 100 I meant Top 100 law school. I'm sorry for the confusion. I'm just trying to get some advice and I didn't mean to offend you.
I don't think he was offended... he was offering advice. For example, if you want to practice in Ohio, you would be better served going to Case Western than going to Cal-Davis, despite Davis' hiring ranking. If you want to practice in St. Louis, you'd be better served going to St. Louis University (a former T2 that is currently outside of the Top 100) than going to Seton Hall, which is in the Top 100. Even so, there are a lot of people on here who would argue going to SLU, SHU, Case, etc. would be a terrible idea no matter what. But we will leave that discussion for another day.
The bottom line is that you should ignore this meaningless Top 100 distinction that you have created in your head because it means virtually nothing for hiring. People will debate the "reach" or the portability of different schools, but as a general guide, look at it like this:
Elite Schools: HYS then CCN
National Powers: The rest of the T12
Quasi-National: GULC, Cornell, Vanderbilt, Texas, UCLA (this list is contentious)
Regional Powers: USC, WUSTL, UIUC, Emory, ND, etc. (and more... but this is contentious as well)
Mediocre Regionals: Most of the T1/T2 and some T3s
Toilets: Everywhere else
Don't look at being in the Top 100 as an important factor. Go to a school that has solid prospects in the region you want to practice.