dontsaywhatyoumean wrote:Feeling really pumped, good, etc, etc!
RC -5
LR - 3
LG - 6
LR - 3
165
(Yeah, yeah, not TLS 170+, but way more than what I need. This margin of safety has me feeling really good. Very doubtful I drop past 158, right??? RIGHT!)
/Canuck disclaimer, not apping to Cooley.
I'm almost not nervous??
I got into this in the September's Waiters thread (maybe it should just be renamed Welcome December Waiters), but a 165 is still a fantastic score. TLS is a great resource, but sometimes can help foster really unhealthy attitudes IMO. a 165 is still better than (I forget exactly, but a 167 is 94%) more than nine out of ten test takers. It's a score that 90% of every test taker would love to have. Be proud of it, and strive to do the best you can. It's fine to set the bar high, but we just need to keep perspective on things.
Doing packet of disagree questions... I guess they are called "point" questions by Cambridge. I feel like for some questions the whole read one and eliminate first works really well, and others it doesn't seem to work as well (i.e. eliminate a bunch of answers)...I think it's still a good way to approach those though.
If anyone has good explanations they typed up for any remotely considerable amount of questions, PM me. I have a project I'm about to launch and I'd love any support

.