The Official October 2015 Study Group Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

How many PTs have you done? (timed)

0+
5
4%
5+
12
10%
10+
25
21%
15+
14
12%
20+
20
17%
25+
9
7%
30+
3
2%
35+
33
27%
 
Total votes: 121

lalaa85

New
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:29 pm

Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group

Post by lalaa85 » Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:35 pm

How do people simulate the experimental section? I have the basic lsac practice tests but I want to practice with five sections

User avatar
gamerish

Gold
Posts: 3128
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:37 pm

Post removed...

Post by gamerish » Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:47 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by gamerish on Sun Jan 03, 2016 1:29 am, edited 8 times in total.

User avatar
ugg

Diamond
Posts: 11771
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:30 pm

Post removed.

Post by ugg » Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:48 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by ugg on Sun Nov 15, 2015 3:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

npt2901

New
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:37 pm

Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group

Post by npt2901 » Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:54 pm

.
Last edited by npt2901 on Thu Jan 14, 2016 12:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mint-Berry_Crunch

Platinum
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am

Post removed...

Post by Mint-Berry_Crunch » Wed Sep 02, 2015 4:04 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by Mint-Berry_Crunch on Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:17 am, edited 2 times in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
PatriotP74

Silver
Posts: 789
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:17 am

Post removed...

Post by PatriotP74 » Wed Sep 02, 2015 5:30 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by PatriotP74 on Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
fishpaste1

Bronze
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 3:25 pm

Post removed.

Post by fishpaste1 » Wed Sep 02, 2015 6:02 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by fishpaste1 on Tue Jan 05, 2016 1:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

davey jones

Platinum
Posts: 7967
Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 7:11 pm

Post removed.

Post by davey jones » Wed Sep 02, 2015 8:10 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by davey jones on Thu Dec 31, 2015 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
appind

Gold
Posts: 2266
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am

Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group

Post by appind » Wed Sep 02, 2015 8:57 pm

wow, perfect pt-66 rc score in the earlier post.

drilled 65 LR and LG.
65 lr1 -2
65 lr2 -0
65 lg -1

skipping rc drilling for now. this is a retake pt so expected LG to be better but that last game took too long even though I had over 10 mins for it. missed one in g4 and got lucky on the last few questions as i didnt have much time for them.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
ltowns1

Silver
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am

Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group

Post by ltowns1 » Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:03 pm

Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:
gamerish wrote:Can someone help me with question 16 from LR #1 on PT 68? I asked on Manhattan but I never get answers so I figured I'd ask here.

Image

The correct answer is C. I just cannot see how that's the case. I realized that there can be local codes not present in the national codes, but C says that if something violates a national code, it also violates a local code. So violation of a national code must also violate a local code and therefore cannot be excused in a local court for the same reason it can't be excused in a national court.

That's the reason I went with E. He can simultaneously comply with the local code - which the judge allows for - while violating the the national code.
What we know from the stim is that the def didn't comply with a code. But he shouldn't be penalized because he was confused.

So you want an answer that says " it doesn't matter if you're confused about whether something is national or local because they're they same".
In a sense, you want to establish a link between national and local codes.
E actually creates a seperation. It strengthens the defs. Position because it allows for a difference in codes.


The fact that the def didn't comply is not the main issue, because the judges argument is confusion isn't an excuse. Why is it not an excuse?
I think the key to this problem is to make sure you focus on the conclusion which is actually based on the guys excuse back at the end of the first sentence

User avatar
mornincounselor

Silver
Posts: 1236
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:37 am

Post removed.

Post by mornincounselor » Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:23 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by mornincounselor on Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mornincounselor

Silver
Posts: 1236
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:37 am

Post removed.

Post by mornincounselor » Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:35 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by mornincounselor on Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
SirArthurDayne

Gold
Posts: 2684
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 10:51 pm

Post removed.

Post by SirArthurDayne » Wed Sep 02, 2015 9:38 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by SirArthurDayne on Thu Dec 31, 2015 10:43 am, edited 2 times in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
PatriotP74

Silver
Posts: 789
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:17 am

Post removed...

Post by PatriotP74 » Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:01 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by PatriotP74 on Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
gamerish

Gold
Posts: 3128
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:37 pm

Post removed...

Post by gamerish » Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:02 am

Post removed...
Last edited by gamerish on Sun Jan 03, 2016 1:29 am, edited 7 times in total.

User avatar
Mint-Berry_Crunch

Platinum
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am

Post removed...

Post by Mint-Berry_Crunch » Thu Sep 03, 2015 1:38 am

Post removed...
Last edited by Mint-Berry_Crunch on Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:17 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
somethingElse

Gold
Posts: 4007
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm

Post removed...

Post by somethingElse » Thu Sep 03, 2015 9:26 am

Post removed...
Last edited by somethingElse on Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


davey jones

Platinum
Posts: 7967
Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 7:11 pm

Post removed.

Post by davey jones » Thu Sep 03, 2015 9:30 am

Post removed.
Last edited by davey jones on Thu Dec 31, 2015 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
sanibella

Bronze
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:29 am

Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group

Post by sanibella » Thu Sep 03, 2015 9:35 am

Hey, would it be possible to use a spoiler tag or move an individual question to its own thread please? I haven't taken that PT yet and I'd like to keep them as fresh as possible :D

But if no one else is bothered, I will suck it up and survive.

User avatar
mornincounselor

Silver
Posts: 1236
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:37 am

Post removed.

Post by mornincounselor » Thu Sep 03, 2015 10:54 am

Post removed.
Last edited by mornincounselor on Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
gamerish

Gold
Posts: 3128
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:37 pm

Post removed...

Post by gamerish » Thu Sep 03, 2015 11:35 am

Post removed...
Last edited by gamerish on Sun Jan 03, 2016 1:29 am, edited 7 times in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Judgeasaurus_Rex

Bronze
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 3:08 pm

Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group

Post by Judgeasaurus_Rex » Thu Sep 03, 2015 11:55 am

gamerish wrote:Can someone help me with question 16 from LR #1 on PT 68? I asked on Manhattan but I never get answers so I figured I'd ask here.



The correct answer is C. I just cannot see how that's the case. I realized that there can be local codes not present in the national codes, but C says that if something violates a national code, it also violates a local code. So violation of a national code must also violate a local code and therefore cannot be excused in a local court for the same reason it can't be excused in a national court.

That's the reason I went with E. He can simultaneously comply with the local code - which the judge allows for - while violating the the national code.
This post may be in violation of the LSAC's new policy regarding Pdf files! :o

User avatar
Mint-Berry_Crunch

Platinum
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am

Post removed...

Post by Mint-Berry_Crunch » Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:28 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by Mint-Berry_Crunch on Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:17 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Mint-Berry_Crunch

Platinum
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am

Post removed...

Post by Mint-Berry_Crunch » Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:29 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by Mint-Berry_Crunch on Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:17 am, edited 2 times in total.

PoopNpants

Silver
Posts: 854
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:40 pm

Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group

Post by PoopNpants » Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:57 pm

Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:September 3rd.
Exactly one month away. I still haven't hit my target score yet I'm getting real anxious

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”