The Official October 2015 Study Group Forum
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 7:29 pm
Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group
How do people simulate the experimental section? I have the basic lsac practice tests but I want to practice with five sections
- gamerish
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:37 pm
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by gamerish on Sun Jan 03, 2016 1:29 am, edited 8 times in total.
- ugg
- Posts: 11771
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 9:30 pm
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:37 pm
Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group
.
Last edited by npt2901 on Thu Jan 14, 2016 12:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Mint-Berry_Crunch
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by Mint-Berry_Crunch on Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- PatriotP74
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:17 am
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by PatriotP74 on Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
- fishpaste1
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 3:25 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by fishpaste1 on Tue Jan 05, 2016 1:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 7967
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 7:11 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by davey jones on Thu Dec 31, 2015 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group
wow, perfect pt-66 rc score in the earlier post.
drilled 65 LR and LG.
65 lr1 -2
65 lr2 -0
65 lg -1
skipping rc drilling for now. this is a retake pt so expected LG to be better but that last game took too long even though I had over 10 mins for it. missed one in g4 and got lucky on the last few questions as i didnt have much time for them.
drilled 65 LR and LG.
65 lr1 -2
65 lr2 -0
65 lg -1
skipping rc drilling for now. this is a retake pt so expected LG to be better but that last game took too long even though I had over 10 mins for it. missed one in g4 and got lucky on the last few questions as i didnt have much time for them.
- ltowns1
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am
Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group
I think the key to this problem is to make sure you focus on the conclusion which is actually based on the guys excuse back at the end of the first sentenceMint-Berry_Crunch wrote:What we know from the stim is that the def didn't comply with a code. But he shouldn't be penalized because he was confused.gamerish wrote:Can someone help me with question 16 from LR #1 on PT 68? I asked on Manhattan but I never get answers so I figured I'd ask here.
The correct answer is C. I just cannot see how that's the case. I realized that there can be local codes not present in the national codes, but C says that if something violates a national code, it also violates a local code. So violation of a national code must also violate a local code and therefore cannot be excused in a local court for the same reason it can't be excused in a national court.
That's the reason I went with E. He can simultaneously comply with the local code - which the judge allows for - while violating the the national code.
So you want an answer that says " it doesn't matter if you're confused about whether something is national or local because they're they same".
In a sense, you want to establish a link between national and local codes.
E actually creates a seperation. It strengthens the defs. Position because it allows for a difference in codes.
The fact that the def didn't comply is not the main issue, because the judges argument is confusion isn't an excuse. Why is it not an excuse?
- mornincounselor
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:37 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by mornincounselor on Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- mornincounselor
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:37 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by mornincounselor on Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- SirArthurDayne
- Posts: 2684
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 10:51 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by SirArthurDayne on Thu Dec 31, 2015 10:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- PatriotP74
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 12:17 am
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by PatriotP74 on Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
- gamerish
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:37 pm
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by gamerish on Sun Jan 03, 2016 1:29 am, edited 7 times in total.
- Mint-Berry_Crunch
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by Mint-Berry_Crunch on Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by somethingElse on Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 7967
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 7:11 pm
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by davey jones on Thu Dec 31, 2015 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
- sanibella
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:29 am
Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group
Hey, would it be possible to use a spoiler tag or move an individual question to its own thread please? I haven't taken that PT yet and I'd like to keep them as fresh as possible
But if no one else is bothered, I will suck it up and survive.

But if no one else is bothered, I will suck it up and survive.
- mornincounselor
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:37 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by mornincounselor on Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- gamerish
- Posts: 3128
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:37 pm
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by gamerish on Sun Jan 03, 2016 1:29 am, edited 7 times in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Judgeasaurus_Rex
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 3:08 pm
Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group
This post may be in violation of the LSAC's new policy regarding Pdf files!gamerish wrote:Can someone help me with question 16 from LR #1 on PT 68? I asked on Manhattan but I never get answers so I figured I'd ask here.
The correct answer is C. I just cannot see how that's the case. I realized that there can be local codes not present in the national codes, but C says that if something violates a national code, it also violates a local code. So violation of a national code must also violate a local code and therefore cannot be excused in a local court for the same reason it can't be excused in a national court.
That's the reason I went with E. He can simultaneously comply with the local code - which the judge allows for - while violating the the national code.

- Mint-Berry_Crunch
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by Mint-Berry_Crunch on Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
- Mint-Berry_Crunch
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am
Post removed...
Post removed...
Last edited by Mint-Berry_Crunch on Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:40 pm
Re: The Official October 2015 Study Group
Exactly one month away. I still haven't hit my target score yet I'm getting real anxiousMint-Berry_Crunch wrote:September 3rd.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login