Post removed. Forum
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:09 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
If an involved retaker breaks 177+ on their next PT, I'll PW my beard for entertainment. Well, intense scruff in any event.bee wrote:im not burned out, i just lack motivationljoandc wrote:Anyone starting to feel a little burned out? I've been going through ups and downs this past week and a half. Some days I'm pumped up and doing really well. Other days, most notably yesterday and part of today, I'm feeling mehhhh. I know I could've been so much more productive but the rain over here just made me want to curl up and sleep.
eta: tcr is to push harder in my case. you should take a day off
This is all I have to contribute.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:09 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Take care of yourself.ljoandc wrote:Anyone starting to feel a little burned out? I've been going through ups and downs this past week and a half. Some days I'm pumped up and doing really well. Other days, most notably yesterday and part of today, I'm feeling mehhhh. I know I could've been so much more productive but the rain over here just made me want to curl up and sleep.
Good food, drink, sex, and swimming. Most of those are free.
- OVOXO
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
PT63: wtf was that passage bout?
LR1 −0 (second one. I love these)
LR2 −2
LG −0 (games on the easier end?)
RC −4 (passage 3 killed me)
LGX PT 27 I don’t wanna talk about it.
95/101
174
Pretty good showing and I’ll take it. Killed that third game because of the P/L inference. But had my worst showing on RC in a loong time. Also, LG from PT27 was ridiculous. That snakes game. Definitely redoing it.
LR1 −0 (second one. I love these)
LR2 −2
LG −0 (games on the easier end?)
RC −4 (passage 3 killed me)
LGX PT 27 I don’t wanna talk about it.
95/101
174
Pretty good showing and I’ll take it. Killed that third game because of the P/L inference. But had my worst showing on RC in a loong time. Also, LG from PT27 was ridiculous. That snakes game. Definitely redoing it.
- OVOXO
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
sleep, nutrition, and exercise are REALLY important to this test. I know it’s emphasized on these boards, but it’s super easy to get lost in all the drilling/pting to forget about the other stuff.dcruss wrote:Yeah, I think this is totally natural. Some days a workout feels great, sometimes it feels like everything is a lot harder. If you are legitimately burned out though, don't automatically combat it with pushing harder.ljoandc wrote:Anyone starting to feel a little burned out? I've been going through ups and downs this past week and a half. Some days I'm pumped up and doing really well. Other days, most notably yesterday and part of today, I'm feeling mehhhh. I know I could've been so much more productive but the rain over here just made me want to curl up and sleep.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lsatyolo
- Posts: 2403
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:17 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Took 70 again this morning, 9 point increase and my highest score yet. How should I feel about this? I never reviewed it once I received my (shitty) score.
- CookieDough
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
So I took a PT after my ridiculously long break from doing them. Haven't done a blind review yet but my timing is completely falling apart on LG. I missed an entire game which never happens. Someone please reassure me that it's the time off from PTing and not the start of a new fresh hell...
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:04 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
When I take breaks from PT my timing reflects it (last week, I hadn't even started game 4 until the last 5 minutes), but if it's any consolation, it always picks back up.CookieDough wrote:So I took a PT after my ridiculously long break from doing them. Haven't done a blind review yet but my timing is completely falling apart on LG. I missed an entire game which never happens. Someone please reassure me that it's the time off from PTing and not the start of a new fresh hell...
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:02 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- CookieDough
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Thank you for this. I definitely hope so! On the upside my drilling LR and RC paid off big time- I managed a 171 with the skipped game (in fairness I guessed correctly on two of the LG questions I skipped) and a 175 on blind review which is a much needed confidence boost after the 166 disaster last PT. Guess I should drill some games so it doesn't drag me down lolblackbirdfly wrote:When I take breaks from PT my timing reflects it (last week, I hadn't even started game 4 until the last 5 minutes), but if it's any consolation, it always picks back up.CookieDough wrote:So I took a PT after my ridiculously long break from doing them. Haven't done a blind review yet but my timing is completely falling apart on LG. I missed an entire game which never happens. Someone please reassure me that it's the time off from PTing and not the start of a new fresh hell...
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
I -0ed 67 LG the first time and bombed Zones the 2nd time. Happens.bee wrote:pretty fucking disappointed in myself today. retook 67, which i did once before oct and scored well on. i expected a 180 due to the high score i got last time, but ended up with a 177. more concerning is the fact that i missed questions i had gotten correct the first time round. counting for score inflation, this probably would've been a mid (low?!) 170s.
lr1: -0
lr2: -1
lg: -2 (1 stupid miss on a global accounting q, and one q from zones. FFS, HOW AM I STILL FUCKING UP ON ZONES THE SECOND TIME THROUGH?!)
rc: -1
raw: 98/100, scaled: 177
ARRRRRRGH. i can't believe this test is a -10. that's positively sadistic. this was objectively 100x harder than 70.
- bbkk
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
I'm so jelly that you guys still have fresh PTs! I've done only 3 PTs since Oct and got 3 180s in a row - BECAUSE I REMEMBER THE QUESTIONS! Sometimes it just sucks to have a good memory.
Also, I really, really need motivation. I've been doing 1 PT per week since I got my score.

Also, I really, really need motivation. I've been doing 1 PT per week since I got my score.

-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
PT 56 fresh
LR1: -2 (went too fast and screwed up a really easy problem. Still fine tuning my ideal speed)
LR2: -1
RC: -6 (the second passage killed my timing (while getting 3 wrong) and it forced me to rush the last passage)
LG: -0
91/100. 172
Happy with the performance -RC. I had been having a lot of improvement in RC until this.
LR1: -2 (went too fast and screwed up a really easy problem. Still fine tuning my ideal speed)
LR2: -1
RC: -6 (the second passage killed my timing (while getting 3 wrong) and it forced me to rush the last passage)
LG: -0
91/100. 172
Happy with the performance -RC. I had been having a lot of improvement in RC until this.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Excellent job on LR. 56 LR has owned many of us TLSers.Thorcogan wrote:PT 56 fresh
LR1: -2 (went too fast and screwed up a really easy problem. Still fine tuning my ideal speed)
LR2: -1
RC: -6 (the second passage killed my timing (while getting 3 wrong) and it forced me to rush the last passage)
LG: -0
91/100. 172
Happy with the performance -RC. I had been having a lot of improvement in RC until this.
- angels2fly
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:15 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
with the movement in the acceptances forum can someone reassure me i will be better off with a, hopefully, better score in dec than i would be if i applied with my oct score?
think we all need this
think we all need this
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:43 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
worst day ever.
pretty sure i'm finally burning out...was doing PT every two days before today..
got the same score from PT70 as Oct. Maybe I have a long long long way to go to improve...
or should I just sit back and relax...try to keep my cool on test day..
pretty sure i'm finally burning out...was doing PT every two days before today..
got the same score from PT70 as Oct. Maybe I have a long long long way to go to improve...
or should I just sit back and relax...try to keep my cool on test day..
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
We do.angels2fly wrote:with the movement in the acceptances forum can someone reassure me i will be better off with a, hopefully, better score in dec than i would be if i applied with my oct score?
think we all need this
But I would think it wouldn't make much difference in terms of scholarship money, at least. Right? Right??!!??!?!
- angels2fly
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:15 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
less TTTTThan youbee wrote:this all depends on what you scored in oct. if i'd gotten 1-2 points more i wouldnt even have given retaking a thought.angels2fly wrote:with the movement in the acceptances forum can someone reassure me i will be better off with a, hopefully, better score in dec than i would be if i applied with my oct score?
think we all need this
-
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:43 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
yeah hopefully man. I just had the worst day ever since Oct score was out - got the same score retaking PT 70 this morning. so probably won't be a big jump for in December. hopefully that I was just burned out.angels2fly wrote:with the movement in the acceptances forum can someone reassure me i will be better off with a, hopefully, better score in dec than i would be if i applied with my oct score?
think we all need this
But i did apply to a few schools just to test the water. I'm not a T14 material. Scored in low 160s in Oct. but SMU offered me 50% tuition waiver which really surprised me. I'm retaking just for UT/try to get more $$$ from SMU..ain't going nowhere outside of Texas..
Just like other people said it all depends on what you are aiming for and what did you score in Oct. Good luck!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:43 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
a bunch of schools i talked to told me "to submit when you feel your application is the strongest".Otunga wrote:We do.angels2fly wrote:with the movement in the acceptances forum can someone reassure me i will be better off with a, hopefully, better score in dec than i would be if i applied with my oct score?
think we all need this
But I would think it wouldn't make much difference in terms of scholarship money, at least. Right? Right??!!??!?!
I guess if you increased only 1 or 2 points, it doesn't really matter. It matters if the new score pulls you from 25-50th to 50-75th LSAT range well i assume the gap is normally bigger than 1 or 2 points

You always have better chance getting more $$$ if submit early given the approximate same LSAT score (within 1-2 pts range), but I'm sure if you had a big bump you will get more $$$ for sure.
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- angels2fly
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:15 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
youve so got thisbee wrote: i'd need at least a 3 point increase to make my retake worth it
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:09 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Great job, Bee. I guess you're at the point where anything sub 180 feels like a failure? Good for you, you're gonna kill it.bee wrote:i'd need at least a 3 point increase to make my retake worth itkobe1020 wrote:a bunch of schools i talked to told me "to submit when you feel your application is the strongest".Otunga wrote:We do.angels2fly wrote:with the movement in the acceptances forum can someone reassure me i will be better off with a, hopefully, better score in dec than i would be if i applied with my oct score?
think we all need this
But I would think it wouldn't make much difference in terms of scholarship money, at least. Right? Right??!!??!?!
I guess if you increased only 1 or 2 points, it doesn't really matter. It matters if the new score pulls you from 25-50th to 50-75th LSAT range well i assume the gap is normally bigger than 1 or 2 points
You always have better chance getting more $$$ if submit early given the approximate same LSAT score (within 1-2 pts range), but I'm sure if you had a big bump you will get more $$$ for sure.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login