He has a point, though; the idea that a 166 won't get you accepted anywhere worth attending is overly simplistic.North wrote:Who wants to turn this babbling into a Flaw LR question?iamgeorgebush wrote:This is such nonsense...with a strong enough GPA, a 166 could get you into Berkeley, whose median is 167.guano wrote: People who get 166 might not be lazy, but they got no place going to law school. Retake or don't go
Even without a strong GPA, the T14-or-bust mentality isn't necessarily warranted. There are people who go to lower-ranked law schools, do very well at those law schools, and end up having very successful careers. I know several such people.
Overheard at the LSAT Forum
- ScottRiqui
- Posts: 3633
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
- iamgeorgebush
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
So you think that a person who scores a 166 has "no place going to law school"?North wrote:Who wants to turn this babbling into a Flaw LR question?iamgeorgebush wrote:This is such nonsense...with a strong enough GPA, a 166 could get you into Berkeley, whose median is 167.guano wrote: People who get 166 might not be lazy, but they got no place going to law school. Retake or don't go
Even without a strong GPA, the T14-or-bust mentality isn't necessarily warranted. There are people who go to lower-ranked law schools, do very well at those law schools, and end up having very successful careers. I know several such people.
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
I think that everyone should have T14 numbers, even if they are going to a regional school. The market is bad enough that you should only go to a T14, or a regional school with a big scholarship (which generally requires T14 numbers unless it's a school that's not even worth attending for free). So a 166 could fit this description if they had a great GPA.iamgeorgebush wrote:So you think that a person who scores a 166 has "no place going to law school"?North wrote:Who wants to turn this babbling into a Flaw LR question?iamgeorgebush wrote:This is such nonsense...with a strong enough GPA, a 166 could get you into Berkeley, whose median is 167.guano wrote: People who get 166 might not be lazy, but they got no place going to law school. Retake or don't go
Even without a strong GPA, the T14-or-bust mentality isn't necessarily warranted. There are people who go to lower-ranked law schools, do very well at those law schools, and end up having very successful careers. I know several such people.
-
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
93 percentile not good enoughImNoScar wrote: I think that everyone should have T14 numbers, even if they are going to a regional school. The market is bad enough that you should only go to a T14, or a regional school with a big scholarship (which generally requires T14 numbers unless it's a school that's not even worth attending for free). So a 166 could fit this description if they had a great GPA.
- guano
- Posts: 2264
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:49 am
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
I'll amend. If ya have a 3.8+ GPA a 166 is fine. But that really is the bare minimum.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
Who cares what the percentile is. What school are you referincing that is worth attending?jk148706 wrote:93 percentile not good enoughImNoScar wrote: I think that everyone should have T14 numbers, even if they are going to a regional school. The market is bad enough that you should only go to a T14, or a regional school with a big scholarship (which generally requires T14 numbers unless it's a school that's not even worth attending for free). So a 166 could fit this description if they had a great GPA.
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
Was getting at the bolded. Editing quotes on my phone in class is hard.iamgeorgebush wrote:So you think that a person who scores a 166 has "no place going to law school"?North wrote:Who wants to turn this babbling into a Flaw LR question?iamgeorgebush wrote:This is such nonsense...with a strong enough GPA, a 166 could get you into Berkeley, whose median is 167.guano wrote: People who get 166 might not be lazy, but they got no place going to law school. Retake or don't go
Even without a strong GPA, the T14-or-bust mentality isn't necessarily warranted. There are people who go to lower-ranked law schools, do very well at those law schools, and end up having very successful careers. I know several such people.
Non-bolded guy should retake for HYS anyway.
- JWP1022
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:15 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
Some of the people posting in this thread right now are fucking idiots, and assholes to boot. A non-URM buddy of mine got into Duke and Michigan with a 3.7 and a 167. More broadly speaking, a good GPA from a good institution and a 166 could get you into some lower-tier T14 right now.
Also saying someone with a 93rd percentile score has no business going to law school makes you a douche of the highest order.
Also saying someone with a 93rd percentile score has no business going to law school makes you a douche of the highest order.
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
Calm down. If you have a great GPA from a good school then retake for money. No one's impressed that your friend or anyone else will pay 250k for a degree when a slightly better LSAT cuts the cost in half. As someone who nearly went to LS with a 166 I had no business going then and thank god I didn't. Now let's get this thread back on track.JWP1022 wrote:Some of the people posting in this thread right now are fucking idiots, and assholes to boot. A non-URM buddy of mine got into Duke and Michigan with a 3.7 and a 167. More broadly speaking, a good GPA from a good institution and a 166 could get you into some lower-tier T14 right now.
Also saying someone with a 93rd percentile score has no business going to law school makes you a douche of the highest order.
- northwood
- Posts: 5036
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
Way to allow this thread to go off track October LSAT takers... Bring on the funnies
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:40 am
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
Shut up! More funny shit from the LSAT!
- AnonymousAlterEgoC
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 9:13 am
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
This isn't really that funny but...
I accidentally wore sunglasses to the test. Because of the location, I had to walk twenty minutes and it's bright here. I was freaking out because, like most douches, I wear expensive sunglasses (not flashy sunglasses, just expensive sunglasses). I could not find sunglasses on the list of items that was allowed/disallowed, so I decided that I needed to hide them. In hindsight, this was probably unnecessary, but this was my first time taking the test. So I found a bathroom close to the testing center and went to hide them behind a toilet in one of the stalls. I pushed my sunglasses behind the toilet and in doing so pushed another pair of sunglasses out, which someone must have hidden/lost. I pushed them back in and left them there. At the end of the test (the test was administered in different locations depending on the alphabet), I went back and found only my sunglasses.
I accidentally wore sunglasses to the test. Because of the location, I had to walk twenty minutes and it's bright here. I was freaking out because, like most douches, I wear expensive sunglasses (not flashy sunglasses, just expensive sunglasses). I could not find sunglasses on the list of items that was allowed/disallowed, so I decided that I needed to hide them. In hindsight, this was probably unnecessary, but this was my first time taking the test. So I found a bathroom close to the testing center and went to hide them behind a toilet in one of the stalls. I pushed my sunglasses behind the toilet and in doing so pushed another pair of sunglasses out, which someone must have hidden/lost. I pushed them back in and left them there. At the end of the test (the test was administered in different locations depending on the alphabet), I went back and found only my sunglasses.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:50 am
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
This one guy I know wrote the test in june with me for the first time. After we received our scores, I asked him what his score/percentile was...
He said: "I got a 160, but I dont have a percentile, they didn't send me one, I think my test centre didn't do the percentile thing"
He said: "I got a 160, but I dont have a percentile, they didn't send me one, I think my test centre didn't do the percentile thing"
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
camelthing wrote:This isn't really that funny but...
I accidentally wore sunglasses to the test. Because of the location, I had to walk twenty minutes and it's bright here. I was freaking out because, like most douches, I wear expensive sunglasses (not flashy sunglasses, just expensive sunglasses). I could not find sunglasses on the list of items that was allowed/disallowed, so I decided that I needed to hide them. In hindsight, this was probably unnecessary, but this was my first time taking the test. So I found a bathroom close to the testing center and went to hide them behind a toilet in one of the stalls. I pushed my sunglasses behind the toilet and in doing so pushed another pair of sunglasses out, which someone must have hidden/lost. I pushed them back in and left them there. At the end of the test (the test was administered in different locations depending on the alphabet), I went back and found only my sunglasses.



- sopranorleone
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:38 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
The Godfather, LSAT-styleNorth wrote:camelthing wrote:This isn't really that funny but...
I accidentally wore sunglasses to the test. Because of the location, I had to walk twenty minutes and it's bright here. I was freaking out because, like most douches, I wear expensive sunglasses (not flashy sunglasses, just expensive sunglasses). I could not find sunglasses on the list of items that was allowed/disallowed, so I decided that I needed to hide them. In hindsight, this was probably unnecessary, but this was my first time taking the test. So I found a bathroom close to the testing center and went to hide them behind a toilet in one of the stalls. I pushed my sunglasses behind the toilet and in doing so pushed another pair of sunglasses out, which someone must have hidden/lost. I pushed them back in and left them there. At the end of the test (the test was administered in different locations depending on the alphabet), I went back and found only my sunglasses.![]()
![]()
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
Awesome story, cannot believe how dumb some people are. But they gave you more time?!?!?!?! I took June 2010 and some asshole's phone went off during the test and we all had to listen to 5 minutes of him negotiating with the proctor (in the end he was aloud to turn it off and keep it. Rrrg.) No extra time.PDaddy wrote:Taking section 3, and a cell phone rings.
Girl: "Hello? Oh...yeah...ok, hold on!" (quickly covers the phone speaker)
Girl (to Proctor): "Um...do you mind if I take this call? It's my friend Anastasia from New York; I have to find out how her test went."
Examinees:![]()
![]()
![]()
The Proctor is so stunned she stands there with her mouth open without saying a word. The examinees sit in shock as well.
Proctor (After she realizes it isn't a joke): "Uh...sure, ya...just take it outside. Oh! And leave your materials HERE, and don't bother coming back, ok?"![]()
Girl: "Oh...well...ok! Are you sure?"
Proctor:![]()
Girl: "I'm so excited!"
Girl (to her firend as she gathers her belongings to walk out): "Ok, so go ahead. No, the proctor was kinda interrupting me, girl. She is...so rude! (farts on the way out, lol.)
Girl: "So ok ok, go ahead."
Note: Think Hillary Banks from The Fresh Prince of Bel Aire
Proctor gives the examinees 2-3 minutes back on the clock.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:27 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
Girl sitting next to me: Are you retaking?
Me: Yep, I didn't do as well as I would've liked on my first try.
Girl sitting next to me: Did you get below a 150?
Me: No, I got above a 150.
Girl sitting next to me: Then why are you retaking?
Me: I've been studying for about 8 months now, for about 4 hours a day. How about you? Did you study?
Girl sitting next to me: I took a practice test
Girl sitting next to me's friend: I didn't study; what's on the test?
Me: Logic.
Girl sitting next to me: Basically whatever you think the right answer is, it's the opposite.
Me: Yep, I didn't do as well as I would've liked on my first try.
Girl sitting next to me: Did you get below a 150?
Me: No, I got above a 150.
Girl sitting next to me: Then why are you retaking?
Me: I've been studying for about 8 months now, for about 4 hours a day. How about you? Did you study?
Girl sitting next to me: I took a practice test
Girl sitting next to me's friend: I didn't study; what's on the test?
Me: Logic.
Girl sitting next to me: Basically whatever you think the right answer is, it's the opposite.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- PepperJack
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
Sounds like you missed the perfect opportunity to ask her out.Ron_Burgundy wrote:Girl sitting next to me: Are you retaking?
Me: Yep, I didn't do as well as I would've liked on my first try.
Girl sitting next to me: Did you get below a 150?
Me: No, I got above a 150.
Girl sitting next to me: Then why are you retaking?
Me: I've been studying for about 8 months now, for about 4 hours a day. How about you? Did you study?
Girl sitting next to me: I took a practice test
Girl sitting next to me's friend: I didn't study; what's on the test?
Me: Logic.
Girl sitting next to me: Basically whatever you think the right answer is, it's the opposite.
Girl next to you: I have a boyfriend, sorry.
You: Opposite.
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
sopranorleone wrote:The Godfather, LSAT-styleNorth wrote:camelthing wrote:This isn't really that funny but...
I accidentally wore sunglasses to the test. Because of the location, I had to walk twenty minutes and it's bright here. I was freaking out because, like most douches, I wear expensive sunglasses (not flashy sunglasses, just expensive sunglasses). I could not find sunglasses on the list of items that was allowed/disallowed, so I decided that I needed to hide them. In hindsight, this was probably unnecessary, but this was my first time taking the test. So I found a bathroom close to the testing center and went to hide them behind a toilet in one of the stalls. I pushed my sunglasses behind the toilet and in doing so pushed another pair of sunglasses out, which someone must have hidden/lost. I pushed them back in and left them there. At the end of the test (the test was administered in different locations depending on the alphabet), I went back and found only my sunglasses.![]()
![]()

- RhymesLikeDimes
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:58 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
"Albany is a good school. Andrew Cuomo went there!"
- ZGr88n
- Posts: 449
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:00 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
Girl in front of me: "I've been studying for like 3-4 months and did a few Logic games this morning before coming"
2 Girls behind me: "Wow, your just trying way to hard, for no reason"
Me: "Well you could have at least brushed your teeth before coming this morning, or would that be 'trying to hard, for no reason'"
2 Girls behind me: "Wow, your just trying way to hard, for no reason"
Me: "Well you could have at least brushed your teeth before coming this morning, or would that be 'trying to hard, for no reason'"
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:30 am
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
If the requirement is a big scholarship to a regional school, then I don't understand all these "bare minimums" people are talking about. I got large scholarships to Alabama and Emory and I was running a total trash GPA (2.25/167). A 166 can get you into a good regional school with decent money even with a mediocre GPA if the rest of your app is solid.ImNoScar wrote:I think that everyone should have T14 numbers, even if they are going to a regional school. The market is bad enough that you should only go to a T14, or a regional school with a big scholarship (which generally requires T14 numbers unless it's a school that's not even worth attending for free). So a 166 could fit this description if they had a great GPA.
-
- Posts: 8258
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
You'll make a wonderful law student.ZGr88n wrote:Girl in front of me: "I've been studying for like 3-4 months and did a few Logic games this morning before coming"
2 Girls behind me: "Wow, your just trying way to hard, for no reason"
Me: "Well you could have at least brushed your teeth before coming this morning, or would that be 'trying to hard, for no reason'"
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
ZGr88n wrote:Girl in front of me: "I've been studying for like 3-4 months and did a few Logic games this morning before coming"
2 Girls behind me: "Wow, your just trying way to hard, for no reason"
Me: "Well you could have at least brushed your teeth before coming this morning, or would that be 'trying to hard, for no reason'"

-
- Posts: 8258
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: Overheard at the LSAT
Would understanding the difference between to, too, and two be classified as "trying to hard, for no reason" under your analysis?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login