June 2017 Waiters Thread- Grayday! -9 curve. GL all Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

What did you get? (Presumptive release day poll. Revolting enabled)

177+
8
6%
175+
6
4%
173+
21
15%
170+
25
17%
167+
27
19%
165+
16
11%
163+
14
10%
160+
9
6%
159 -
18
13%
 
Total votes: 144

User avatar
Tape Dog

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:19 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Tape Dog » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:04 pm

Platopus wrote:
Slippin' Jimmy wrote:While we're on the subject of politics, anyone else right of center? Or am I alone?
I'm on the right for the most part. I'm probably more of a libertarian, but if I had to pick Dem / Rep, I'll almost always vote Republican.
Always R

User avatar
MediocreAtBest

Silver
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:51 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by MediocreAtBest » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:05 pm

Jack_Kelly wrote:
MediocreAtBest wrote:I'm for whichever candidate doesn't want to keep bombing the shit out of countries.
Do these exist? (Maybe Sanders and Paul to a degree) Trump and Clinton seemed to be constantly trying to prove they were the more hawkish candidate.
Clinton's hawkishness was the main reason I couldn't vote for her. Trump...well he's trump so that wasn't gonna happen either lol. I liked Sanders, he wasn't a "great" candidate by any means but I think he was the shift away from the norm that should've happened. I don't mind Paul but it always seems like there's some sort of catch with him as soon as he says something that makes sense.

User avatar
Mint-Berry_Crunch

Platinum
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Mint-Berry_Crunch » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:05 pm

Jack_Kelly wrote:
Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:
Jack_Kelly wrote:
chargers21 wrote:
Slippin' Jimmy wrote:While we're on the subject of politics, anyone else right of center? Or am I alone?
ooooooh boy you will be ripped to shreds in the off-topics if you make it there. A fellow C/O 2020 poster, bwaldorf, is certainly right of center. She has been harassed a bit for that because this site is super liberal. I personally am a small "l" libertarian. I usually vote left because of my social liberalness. I vote libertarian when it's an option, even though some of the platforms for the party are whacky. but otherwise often vote Dem. I vote for some repubs in the local elections because everyone in my area is pretty far right regardless of party affiliation.

Libertarians also get ripped to shreds on here. #TaxationIsTheft #DefendThe2nd #LegalizeFreedom

I voted for Gary in 2016
I describe myself as a small l libertarian as well, but in the old sense of the word. I'm a libertarian socialist, I probably identify mostly with Luxemburgism. Support a small central government and direct democracy, But I'm also an anti-capitalist, which puts me pretty far from the US Libertarian Party policy. Johnson might be slightly less awful than Clinton in my mind due to foreign policy alone, but I threw my vote away with Stein instead.
I'm ignorant how to do you reconcile libertarianism and anti capitalism


Like the role of the gov then is only to monitor/direct economy?
I mean, anarchism is certainly both libertarian and anti-capitalist. Rojava, the northern (Kurdish) part of Syria, is a bit of an experiment in libertarian socialism ("democratic confederalism" is the name of the specific ideology). Organization there tends to be at the level of towns or villages, the central government is existent but quite weak.

Luxemburg was the leader of the German Communist Party, and opposed Leninism as undemocratic, she supported a free press and direct democratic control of institutions.

And honestly not a big fan of Stein tbh, but by far my favorite of her, Trump, Clinton, and Johnson.
My question was more, how do you, on a theoretical level, justify having these two beliefs? Because economic policy under libertarianism seems to be pretty hands off, which is a part of capitalism.


If you're anti capitalist, what actually are you? Like, you support a more active role of government in the economy? This would seem to violate libertarianism as I understand it.
As you've described it, the libertarianism as it's used by you and jimmy seems to only deal with like, personal rights.

Does that kinda show where I'm confused

User avatar
Jack_Kelly

Silver
Posts: 900
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Jack_Kelly » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:07 pm

A genuinely anti-war, principled candidate the media made every attempt to marginalize (successfully): Dennis Kucinich.

His politics have aged extremely well, and his liberal critics'....have not, to say the least

User avatar
MediocreAtBest

Silver
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:51 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by MediocreAtBest » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:11 pm

Jack_Kelly wrote:A genuinely anti-war, principled candidate the media made every attempt to marginalize (successfully): Dennis Kucinich.

His politics have aged extremely well, and his liberal critics'....have not, to say the least
Adam Johnson is a good follow on twitter. And yeah I find centrist dems to be a pretty slimy group in general.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Mint-Berry_Crunch

Platinum
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Mint-Berry_Crunch » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:12 pm

This thread needs more pws

User avatar
Jack_Kelly

Silver
Posts: 900
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Jack_Kelly » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:12 pm

MediocreAtBest wrote:
Jack_Kelly wrote:
MediocreAtBest wrote:I'm for whichever candidate doesn't want to keep bombing the shit out of countries.
Do these exist? (Maybe Sanders and Paul to a degree) Trump and Clinton seemed to be constantly trying to prove they were the more hawkish candidate.
Clinton's hawkishness was the main reason I couldn't vote for her. Trump...well he's trump so that wasn't gonna happen either lol. I liked Sanders, he wasn't a "great" candidate by any means but I think he was the shift away from the norm that should've happened. I don't mind Paul but it always seems like there's some sort of catch with him as soon as he says something that makes sense.
I 100% agree. I was leaning toward a lesser evil vote for Clinton until she doubled down on the Russophobia, insane promise to institute no fly zone in Syria (which it looks like Trump will do anyway).
Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:
Jack_Kelly wrote:
Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:
Jack_Kelly wrote:
chargers21 wrote:
Slippin' Jimmy wrote:While we're on the subject of politics, anyone else right of center? Or am I alone?
ooooooh boy you will be ripped to shreds in the off-topics if you make it there. A fellow C/O 2020 poster, bwaldorf, is certainly right of center. She has been harassed a bit for that because this site is super liberal. I personally am a small "l" libertarian. I usually vote left because of my social liberalness. I vote libertarian when it's an option, even though some of the platforms for the party are whacky. but otherwise often vote Dem. I vote for some repubs in the local elections because everyone in my area is pretty far right regardless of party affiliation.

Libertarians also get ripped to shreds on here. #TaxationIsTheft #DefendThe2nd #LegalizeFreedom

I voted for Gary in 2016
I describe myself as a small l libertarian as well, but in the old sense of the word. I'm a libertarian socialist, I probably identify mostly with Luxemburgism. Support a small central government and direct democracy, But I'm also an anti-capitalist, which puts me pretty far from the US Libertarian Party policy. Johnson might be slightly less awful than Clinton in my mind due to foreign policy alone, but I threw my vote away with Stein instead.
I'm ignorant how to do you reconcile libertarianism and anti capitalism


Like the role of the gov then is only to monitor/direct economy?
I mean, anarchism is certainly both libertarian and anti-capitalist. Rojava, the northern (Kurdish) part of Syria, is a bit of an experiment in libertarian socialism ("democratic confederalism" is the name of the specific ideology). Organization there tends to be at the level of towns or villages, the central government is existent but quite weak.

Luxemburg was the leader of the German Communist Party, and opposed Leninism as undemocratic, she supported a free press and direct democratic control of institutions.

And honestly not a big fan of Stein tbh, but by far my favorite of her, Trump, Clinton, and Johnson.
My question was more, how do you, on a theoretical level, justify having these two beliefs? Because economic policy under libertarianism seems to be pretty hands off, which is a part of capitalism.


If you're anti capitalist, what actually are you? Like, you support a more active role of government in the economy? This would seem to violate libertarianism as I understand it.
As you've described it, the libertarianism as it's used by you and jimmy seems to only deal with like, personal rights.

Does that kinda show where I'm confused
That really is the only core of libertarianism. Libertarian socialists tend to support democratic organization of the workforce, free elections and press (mostly at the more local level), and to oppose central planning in the centralized, bureaucratic sense of the Soviet model. Whether they support central planning at all varies by the degree of libertarianism. When I call myself a libertarian Marxist, I mainly mean I am not a Leninist. Anarchists are libertarian-er than Luxemburgists, many of them would oppose all planning, support immediate abolition of all government and wages- something I think should come about more slowly.

And Adam Johnson is my single favorite political Twitter.

Slippin' Jimmy

Silver
Posts: 892
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Slippin' Jimmy » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:14 pm

HenryHankPalmer wrote:Did anyone else just get the email from TTT Barry U that had "LSAT Scores" in the subject line? That was just cruel.
I almost pissed my pants after glancing at that subject.

Slippin' Jimmy

Silver
Posts: 892
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Slippin' Jimmy » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:19 pm

Jack_Kelly wrote:
MediocreAtBest wrote:
Jack_Kelly wrote:
MediocreAtBest wrote:I'm for whichever candidate doesn't want to keep bombing the shit out of countries.
Do these exist? (Maybe Sanders and Paul to a degree) Trump and Clinton seemed to be constantly trying to prove they were the more hawkish candidate.
Clinton's hawkishness was the main reason I couldn't vote for her. Trump...well he's trump so that wasn't gonna happen either lol. I liked Sanders, he wasn't a "great" candidate by any means but I think he was the shift away from the norm that should've happened. I don't mind Paul but it always seems like there's some sort of catch with him as soon as he says something that makes sense.
I 100% agree. I was leaning toward a lesser evil vote for Clinton until she doubled down on the Russophobia, insane promise to institute no fly zone in Syria (which it looks like Trump will do anyway).
Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:
Jack_Kelly wrote:
Mint-Berry_Crunch wrote:
Jack_Kelly wrote:
chargers21 wrote:
Slippin' Jimmy wrote:While we're on the subject of politics, anyone else right of center? Or am I alone?
ooooooh boy you will be ripped to shreds in the off-topics if you make it there. A fellow C/O 2020 poster, bwaldorf, is certainly right of center. She has been harassed a bit for that because this site is super liberal. I personally am a small "l" libertarian. I usually vote left because of my social liberalness. I vote libertarian when it's an option, even though some of the platforms for the party are whacky. but otherwise often vote Dem. I vote for some repubs in the local elections because everyone in my area is pretty far right regardless of party affiliation.

Libertarians also get ripped to shreds on here. #TaxationIsTheft #DefendThe2nd #LegalizeFreedom

I voted for Gary in 2016
I describe myself as a small l libertarian as well, but in the old sense of the word. I'm a libertarian socialist, I probably identify mostly with Luxemburgism. Support a small central government and direct democracy, But I'm also an anti-capitalist, which puts me pretty far from the US Libertarian Party policy. Johnson might be slightly less awful than Clinton in my mind due to foreign policy alone, but I threw my vote away with Stein instead.
I'm ignorant how to do you reconcile libertarianism and anti capitalism


Like the role of the gov then is only to monitor/direct economy?
I mean, anarchism is certainly both libertarian and anti-capitalist. Rojava, the northern (Kurdish) part of Syria, is a bit of an experiment in libertarian socialism ("democratic confederalism" is the name of the specific ideology). Organization there tends to be at the level of towns or villages, the central government is existent but quite weak.

Luxemburg was the leader of the German Communist Party, and opposed Leninism as undemocratic, she supported a free press and direct democratic control of institutions.

And honestly not a big fan of Stein tbh, but by far my favorite of her, Trump, Clinton, and Johnson.
My question was more, how do you, on a theoretical level, justify having these two beliefs? Because economic policy under libertarianism seems to be pretty hands off, which is a part of capitalism.


If you're anti capitalist, what actually are you? Like, you support a more active role of government in the economy? This would seem to violate libertarianism as I understand it.
As you've described it, the libertarianism as it's used by you and jimmy seems to only deal with like, personal rights.

Does that kinda show where I'm confused
That really is the only core of libertarianism. Libertarian socialists tend to support democratic organization of the workforce, free elections and press (mostly at the more local level), and to oppose central planning in the centralized, bureaucratic sense of the Soviet model. Whether they support central planning at all varies by the degree of libertarianism. When I call myself a libertarian Marxist, I mainly mean I am not a Leninist. Anarchists are libertarian-er than Luxemburgists, many of them would oppose all planning, support immediate abolition of all government and wages- something I think should come about more slowly.

And Adam Johnson is my single favorite political Twitter.
When I say I'm a libertarian I mean that I'm a right wing libertarian/classical liberal which is the common understanding of libertarianism in the modern US political climate. Most people don't describe your views as libertarian anymore and using the term for any kind of Marxism really is antiquated. Its like using "liberal" to describe Jeffersonian/Lockean ideology when today liberal almost always refers to the social liberalism/progressivism of the US Left.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


coskigirl

Bronze
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 9:45 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by coskigirl » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:21 pm

Slippin' Jimmy wrote:
HenryHankPalmer wrote:Did anyone else just get the email from TTT Barry U that had "LSAT Scores" in the subject line? That was just cruel.
I almost pissed my pants after glancing at that subject.
I woke up at 4am to an email from "lsac_notice@lsac.org". Before I read the subject line I nearly puked. It was a Notice of Transcript Receipt.

User avatar
Jack_Kelly

Silver
Posts: 900
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Jack_Kelly » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:23 pm

(avoiding quoting that huge block)

That's kinda true in the US, but not really elsewhere. To say one is very liberal in the US essentially means they are a social democrat. But liberal means center to center-right in the UK, Canada, Australia, basically everywhere else. There is certainly still a libertarian socialist current in the US- I'd call most of the DSA that, and they are growing quickly, and Chomsky, probably the most prominent anti-capitalist in the country, identifies as such.

Purptort

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:21 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Purptort » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:34 pm

I'm pretty mainstream conservative. Going into the primary I really wanted Jeb or Rubio (or anyone but Trump, Cruz, Carson or Fiorina). It's annoying that a sizable chunk of the party had a revolution right when the Republicans were set to take back the presidency. Disharmony isn't going to help any conservative agenda. I interned on the hill and am actually more positive about Congress than most people, but I think the other two branches have gotten a little out of control.

User avatar
Future Ex-Engineer

Silver
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Future Ex-Engineer » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:35 pm

Purptort wrote:I'm pretty mainstream conservative. Going into the primary I really wanted Jeb or Rubio (or anyone but Trump, Cruz, Carson or Fiorina). It's annoying that a sizable chunk of the party had a revolution right when the Republicans were set to take back the presidency. Disharmony isn't going to help any conservative agenda. I interned on the hill and am actually more positive about Congress than most people, but I think the other two branches have gotten a little out of control.
Let's dispel this notion...

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
tuna_wasabi

Bronze
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:16 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by tuna_wasabi » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:45 pm

chargers21 wrote:The candidate referral system (CRS) is opted into on your LSAC account online. It's how you get tons fee waivers. I received waivers from every school other than HYS, Columbia, Penn, Gtown, and Cornell through this system. I asked these schools for waivers, only got 1 from Gtown. Oddly enough, I only paid the app fee for 1 school and it's where I'm going
Has anyone ever got fee waiver from the HYS CCN? :shock:

User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by chandhi » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:47 pm

lynn.wibi wrote:
chargers21 wrote:The candidate referral system (CRS) is opted into on your LSAC account online. It's how you get tons fee waivers. I received waivers from every school other than HYS, Columbia, Penn, Gtown, and Cornell through this system. I asked these schools for waivers, only got 1 from Gtown. Oddly enough, I only paid the app fee for 1 school and it's where I'm going
Has anyone ever got fee waiver from the HYS CCN? :shock:
Yeah I got CCN

User avatar
heyduchess

Silver
Posts: 501
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 2:46 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by heyduchess » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:47 pm

Purptort wrote:I'm pretty mainstream conservative. Going into the primary I really wanted Jeb or Rubio (or anyone but Trump, Cruz, Carson or Fiorina). It's annoying that a sizable chunk of the party had a revolution right when the Republicans were set to take back the presidency. Disharmony isn't going to help any conservative agenda. I interned on the hill and am actually more positive about Congress than most people, but I think the other two branches have gotten a little out of control.
I was raised in the South, but live in Cali, so I'm not hardcore Dem or Republican either and I totalllly voted for Jeb!

On that note....https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-p3 ... 0amlujw01y

User avatar
Mint-Berry_Crunch

Platinum
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Mint-Berry_Crunch » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:49 pm

Can this thread even get to 180

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
tuna_wasabi

Bronze
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:16 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by tuna_wasabi » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:50 pm

chandhi wrote:
lynn.wibi wrote:
chargers21 wrote:The candidate referral system (CRS) is opted into on your LSAC account online. It's how you get tons fee waivers. I received waivers from every school other than HYS, Columbia, Penn, Gtown, and Cornell through this system. I asked these schools for waivers, only got 1 from Gtown. Oddly enough, I only paid the app fee for 1 school and it's where I'm going
Has anyone ever got fee waiver from the HYS CCN? :shock:
Yeah I got CCN
How did you ask for it, o Wise One? Email them your resume, LSAT score, and GPA?

User avatar
MediocreAtBest

Silver
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:51 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by MediocreAtBest » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:50 pm

heyduchess wrote:
Purptort wrote:I'm pretty mainstream conservative. Going into the primary I really wanted Jeb or Rubio (or anyone but Trump, Cruz, Carson or Fiorina). It's annoying that a sizable chunk of the party had a revolution right when the Republicans were set to take back the presidency. Disharmony isn't going to help any conservative agenda. I interned on the hill and am actually more positive about Congress than most people, but I think the other two branches have gotten a little out of control.
I was raised in the South, but live in Cali, so I'm not hardcore Dem or Republican either and I totalllly voted for Jeb!

On that note....https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-p3 ... 0amlujw01y
please clap

User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by chandhi » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:52 pm

lynn.wibi wrote:
chandhi wrote:
lynn.wibi wrote:
chargers21 wrote:The candidate referral system (CRS) is opted into on your LSAC account online. It's how you get tons fee waivers. I received waivers from every school other than HYS, Columbia, Penn, Gtown, and Cornell through this system. I asked these schools for waivers, only got 1 from Gtown. Oddly enough, I only paid the app fee for 1 school and it's where I'm going
Has anyone ever got fee waiver from the HYS CCN? :shock:
Yeah I got CCN
How did you ask for it, o Wise One? Email them your resume, LSAT score, and GPA?
Nope, just signed up for CRS. The fee waivers were unsolicited

User avatar
Walliums

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Walliums » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:53 pm

.
Last edited by Walliums on Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Walliums

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by Walliums » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:56 pm

chandhi wrote:
lynn.wibi wrote:
chargers21 wrote:The candidate referral system (CRS) is opted into on your LSAC account online. It's how you get tons fee waivers. I received waivers from every school other than HYS, Columbia, Penn, Gtown, and Cornell through this system. I asked these schools for waivers, only got 1 from Gtown. Oddly enough, I only paid the app fee for 1 school and it's where I'm going
Has anyone ever got fee waiver from the HYS CCN? :shock:
Yeah I got CCN
Okay I know what HYS is... is CCN Chicago, Columbia, NYU?

User avatar
MediocreAtBest

Silver
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:51 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by MediocreAtBest » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:56 pm

chandhi wrote: Nope, just signed up for CRS. The fee waivers were unsolicited
When did you get the waivers? After you had an LSAT score?

User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by chandhi » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:57 pm

Walliums wrote:
chandhi wrote:
lynn.wibi wrote:
chargers21 wrote:The candidate referral system (CRS) is opted into on your LSAC account online. It's how you get tons fee waivers. I received waivers from every school other than HYS, Columbia, Penn, Gtown, and Cornell through this system. I asked these schools for waivers, only got 1 from Gtown. Oddly enough, I only paid the app fee for 1 school and it's where I'm going
Has anyone ever got fee waiver from the HYS CCN? :shock:
Yeah I got CCN
Okay I know what HYS is... is CCN Chicago, Columbia, NYU?
Yep!

User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread- Dowsing for gray

Post by chandhi » Wed Jun 28, 2017 12:57 pm

MediocreAtBest wrote:
chandhi wrote: Nope, just signed up for CRS. The fee waivers were unsolicited
When did you get the waivers? After you had an LSAT score?
Yes! Usually within a week or so after score release

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”