December 2012 Re-takers Forum

[Sugar Lumps]

The Blind Assassin is sooooo gooooood.

moar study, less books

You just want me to stroke your beard at Northwestern. I KNOW WHAT GAME YOU'RE PLAYING.

[PickledPanda]

I would flirt with you Gabe. What's your favorite food? Cutie.

[GabeQuixote]

[GabeQuixote]

I would flirt with you Gabe. What's your favorite food? Cutie.

[PickledPanda]

You know what, Gabe. Never mind.

[desiballa21]

PT 55

LR1 -2
RC -2
LG -0
LR2 -3

172.. Last time I took this PT I scored -4 on LG so better there..

66 sometime this week, 67 early next week. holla

[Lenahan3]

I got a minor lol out of this GIF conversation ^

[Cobretti]

You know what, Gabe. Never mind.

How long have you had that one chambered?

[HawkeyeGirl]

Just going through my email from today and get really excited when I saw an email from NYU....but it was just their b-school asking me to apply no fee waiver

[Cobretti]

Just going through my email from today and get really excited when I saw an email from NYU....but it was just their b-school asking me to apply no fee waiver

I've gotten so many of those... driving me insane.

[HawkeyeGirl]

Just going through my email from today and get really excited when I saw an email from NYU....but it was just their b-school asking me to apply no fee waiver

I've gotten so many of those... driving me insane.

The b-schools are so persistent. I get an email from MIT, NYU and Kellogg at least twice a week. And I don't even have great stats!

[HawkeyeGirl]

Just submitted the Northwestern JD/MBA part 1 application (biographical stuff) and paid the fee.... Ittt'ssss realllllll.....craycray

[CardozoLaw09]

Just going through my email from today and get really excited when I saw an email from NYU....but it was just their b-school asking me to apply no fee waiver

I've gotten so many of those... driving me insane.

The b-schools are so persistent. I get an email from MIT, NYU and Kellogg at least twice a week. And I don't even have great stats!

What information do these school reps see anyways aside from your GPA, major, and LSAT score? I got an e-mail from UMN about their JD/MBA program but my stats suck as well lol, curious as to what may have motivated them

[Cobretti]

Just going through my email from today and get really excited when I saw an email from NYU....but it was just their b-school asking me to apply no fee waiver

I've gotten so many of those... driving me insane.

The b-schools are so persistent. I get an email from MIT, NYU and Kellogg at least twice a week. And I don't even have great stats!

What information do these school reps see anyways aside from your GPA, major, and LSAT score? I got an e-mail from UMN about their JD/MBA program but my stats suck as well lol, curious as to what may have motivated them

We both took the GMAT

[Lenahan3]

K, so I just took a long sit-down with !Kung to see where I went wrong. It wasn't that the passage was ridiculously difficult or anything, or even the answers were worded harder than usual. It was more like I didn't read the answers as closely as I should have, and it cost me. The only one that was really of any commentable difficulty level was #12, and that's just because I'm bad with those questions.

Good lesson.

[chadbrochill]

PT 55

LR1 -2
RC -2
LG -0
LR2 -3

172.. Last time I took this PT I scored -4 on LG so better there..

66 sometime this week, 67 early next week. holla

Keep it up! Good job on the LG & RC

[chadbrochill]

This was me, steaming through PT 40's LG section, thinking a -0 was surely in order. Until Zephyr blindsided me:

[img]blindside[/img]

What a dirty play, LSAT.

Ya that game drove me crazy. I think my main takeaway from that game was for odd games...stick to the rules.

Glad to see you're getting better at LG, you're gonna start crushing them and never look back, I can smell it

[HawkeyeGirl]

Just checked my snail mail for the first time in 2 weeks. overflowing with giant law school packets!! Idk about you guys, but I love flipping through these things haha

[Lenahan3]

This was me, steaming through PT 40's LG section, thinking a -0 was surely in order. Until Zephyr blindsided me:

[img]blindside[/img]

What a dirty play, LSAT.

Ya that game drove me crazy. I think my main takeaway from that game was for odd games...stick to the rules.

Glad to see you're getting better at LG, you're gonna start crushing them and never look back, I can smell it

I just hit up the ole Juarez and Rosenburg game, which reminded me of something that I've always tried to incorporate on weird/hard games...when in doubt, write, diagram, doodle, do something! The worst thing in the world for me on games is to stare at it and try to figure it out. It just leads to wasted time/wrong answers/rushed feelings.

[gguuueessttt]

Holy traffic batman!

Just finished taking PT 29 on the bus.

LR1: -1
LR2: -1
LG: -1
RC: -2
Score: 177

This was the best I've ever done on a pt early in the morning in a disruptive environment (started at 6:40am). Woohoo.

[Cobretti]

Holy traffic batman!

Just finished taking PT 29 on the bus.

LR1: -1
LR2: -1
LG: -1
RC: -2
Score: 177

This was the best I've ever done on a pt early in the morning in a disruptive environment (started at 6:40am). Woohoo.

most impressive

[GabeQuixote]

You know what, Gabe. Never mind.

[Lenahan3]

Holy traffic batman!

Just finished taking PT 29 on the bus.

LR1: -1
LR2: -1
LG: -1
RC: -2
Score: 177

This was the best I've ever done on a pt early in the morning in a disruptive environment (started at 6:40am). Woohoo.

most impressive

Indeed.

[Cobretti]

Arbitrarily chosen RC passages from the cambridge bundle for this Sunday:

Natural Sciences
pg. 68 - PT7S3P3
pg. 66 - PT35S2P3
Pg. 38 - PT16S4P3
Pg. 36 - PT32S2P4
Pg. 16 - PT11S3P3
Pg. 14 - PT30S3P1

Law
Pg. 72 - PT3S3P3
Pg. 66 - PT33S2P4
Pg. 52 - PT2S1P4
Pg. 50 - PT26S4P4
Pg. 24 - PT32S2P1
Pg. 22 - PT12S3P3

Plan for Sunday at 11AM PST/2PM EST again. If anyone needs a different time speak up.

[Lenahan3]

PT 59:

LG: -3 (wtf)
LR: -2 (again, wtf)
Ex. LR: -1
LR: -0
RC: -4 (3 of them on the first passage, on 1 star difficulty questions)

174/180

Granted, PT 59 is one of the hardest PT's I've encountered, with like a -14 curve or something ridiculous, but this is still unacceptable. The LG should be -0, regardless of the difficulty levels, and the RC, particularly with the questions that I missed, is far too high. My only excuse is that this is the same place that I took a test last Wednesday and scored low then too, so maybe it's this place's atmosphere, but that's a weak excuse.

Reviewing it tonight and seeing how/why I fxcked up so badly.