bernaldiaz wrote:I still want to know who said they got a 177+
You're prob the one that said it!
bernaldiaz wrote:I still want to know who said they got a 177+
we are of different paradigms so there is no point discussing these issues because our comments will be incommensurable.wakka! wrote:ampersand5 wrote:
The whole point of asking those questions was to display the problem of demarcation and why it is not as simple of an argument as "the bible says so". For the most part, people are not against polygamy for religious reasons. They are against polygamy because they see it as a possible erosion of societal values. Whether or not you agree with this, do you understand why it is a reasonable thought?
I think you misunderstand my position; I am a pretty hardcore libertarian. I think you should be able to do anything you want (even if it is harmful to you) as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else. And I mean pretty much literally hurt someone else. If something you do is "offensive to societal values" or offensive to a particular person; they should stop bitching and deal with it. I think polygamy should be legal; all drugs should be legal; alcohol should have no age restriction; people should be allowed to get abortions or married to gay people if they want; etc. If it doesn't hurt me, you should by all means be allowed to do it.
Also, the fuck is with this SOPA/PIPA/ACTA shit? The internet is fine how it is. It doesn't need any regulation.
And wtf is with this NDAA act? Indefinite detainment is now legal? I take issue with that also.
Directed by M.Night Shamalayn.wakka! wrote:bernaldiaz wrote:I still want to know who said they got a 177+
You're prob the one that said it!
We would have a friendship against all odds. Catholics v convicts.Kit Cloudkicker wrote:Dude I think you’d be cool to hang out with. You seem like the type of person that always lightens the mood. In a forum full of random, raging debates… you’re just like, “no but seriously…. Who said 177+ ?”bernaldiaz wrote:I still want to know who said they got a 177+
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
You see what happens, lsac, WHEN YOU FUCK A STRANGER IN THE ASS.Betharl wrote:Oh wow. We've got a gay marriage debate, atheism debate, and abortion debate all going at once. Probably going to reach 200 pages by the end of the day.
Hey FG, Mensa sucks.
hmmm I don't remember seeing that earlier either...Jsa725 wrote:I just logged on to lsac and the chart with the green icons now has " PDF 140kb" written there...above the green icons....
Was that there yesterday? I am freaking out now
Fuck I don't remember if they were there either. But...those icons aren't going to do anything anyways so I'm guessing they didn't change?rglifberg wrote:hmmm I don't remember seeing that earlier either...Jsa725 wrote:I just logged on to lsac and the chart with the green icons now has " PDF 140kb" written there...above the green icons....
Was that there yesterday? I am freaking out now
That's what I'm thinking. Still not sure though.bernaldiaz wrote:Fuck I don't remember if they were there either. But...those icons aren't going to do anything anyways so I'm guessing they didn't change?rglifberg wrote:hmmm I don't remember seeing that earlier either...Jsa725 wrote:I just logged on to lsac and the chart with the green icons now has " PDF 140kb" written there...above the green icons....
Was that there yesterday? I am freaking out now
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Score release is imminent!!! That wasn't there before. But maybe they're just doing that to mess with us?rglifberg wrote:That's what I'm thinking. Still not sure though.bernaldiaz wrote:Fuck I don't remember if they were there either. But...those icons aren't going to do anything anyways so I'm guessing they didn't change?rglifberg wrote:hmmm I don't remember seeing that earlier either...Jsa725 wrote:I just logged on to lsac and the chart with the green icons now has " PDF 140kb" written there...above the green icons....
Was that there yesterday? I am freaking out now
Jsa725 wrote:I dunno, but I was under the impression, based on last years threads, that lsac is updated before any emails are sentrewlor wrote:My question has always been, if they email in groups, does that mean your score isn't available until "your group" gets an email? Or as soon as score #1 is released does that mean all scores are available.
Jsa725 wrote:I dunno, but I was under the impression, based on last years threads, that lsac is updated before any emails are sentrewlor wrote:My question has always been, if they email in groups, does that mean your score isn't available until "your group" gets an email? Or as soon as score #1 is released does that mean all scores are available.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I'm skeptical. 7pm on a Saturday night?lsacqueen wrote:omg... going into automatic refreshing lsac page mode...
Betharl wrote:The scores come out in batches with the LSAC site updating briefly before you receive the E-mail. For some people, the E-mail comes maybe 10-15 minutes after LSAC updates. Although, last Dec LSAC updated and I received my E-mail at about the exact same time.
Jsa725 wrote:I dunno, but I was under the impression, based on last years threads, that lsac is updated before any emails are sentrewlor wrote:My question has always been, if they email in groups, does that mean your score isn't available until "your group" gets an email? Or as soon as score #1 is released does that mean all scores are available.
Yeah I'm about 90% sure they were there before. Can we use the wayback machine on a secure website? That would be able to confirmbarrotmartin wrote:I don't want to be a naysayer, but I think they were there before. Also those kb counts seem to general for them to be referring to real files.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I hope you're right, naysayer.barrotmartin wrote:I don't want to be a naysayer, but I think they were there before. Also those kb counts seem too general for them to be referring to real files.
damnit.lsacqueen wrote:I hope you're right, naysayer.barrotmartin wrote:I don't want to be a naysayer, but I think they were there before. Also those kb counts seem too general for them to be referring to real files.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login