yeah like I just think it's more LIKELY that you'll have a better experience at a 'better' school. I don't think it doesn't matter at all is what I'm trying to say! but maybe it was just my personal experience. either way, doesn't really matter I guess.Smallville wrote:oh totally missed this one, yeah the TTT i took at was a very nice building with some pretty nifty gadgets in the rooms, the TT room was real nice but the building itself was not as nice as the TTTLMD wrote:I doubt it.proteinshake wrote:I mean I was exaggerating when I said this but I definitely think it's much more likely that you're gonna have a bad experience at a TTT than a top 50 university is all I'm saying. after all, higher ranking universities are more likely to have way nicer facilities.TheMikey wrote:Agreed.. I had a friend who took it where I did and he said it wasn't a good experience because of the proctor. But I had a great proctor, and the 2 other ladies helping her were really nice as well.somethingElse wrote:Dude quality of school has almost nothing to do with how the test is going to go, lol. It matters way more which specific room it's in and the proctors you have. Also others' recent reviews of the place (which it looks like your place has, so good idea then).
June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum
- proteinshake

- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Last edited by proteinshake on Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- audaz

- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:11 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
posting again because it's driving me crazy.. does anyone with 2 LR's remember a question about cows and their food intake?
-
Keilz

- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:35 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
TheMikey wrote:A real one had voters over 50 (this was my 5th section). Tbh, I can't really remember my 2nd LR section because my mind was getting fucked by 2 RC sections lmao, sorry. If I remember one of the questions from my other LR, I will definitely let you guys know.forum_user wrote:Mikey everyone but you got three LR sections, need you to confirm real onesTheMikey wrote:YO HOW'D IT GO!?!?!ayylmao wrote:This is real.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think that was the same as the barking bird question - u remember that?
I need to study what these freaking birds are called now
-
CPA-->JD

- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 12:30 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Yea had that one.Keilz wrote:Repeating for anyone out there- anyone with two LRs get a barking birds question? That they barked or whatever due to their predators?
It was one of two 26 question section for me
- ayylmao

- Posts: 543
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:38 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Well! Had two LG, one was cake and the other really hard. I think the hard one was real. But still well! You?TheMikey wrote:YO HOW'D IT GO!?!?!ayylmao wrote:This is real.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
and the proctors are affiliated with the institution too right?proteinshake wrote:I mean I was exaggerating when I said this but I definitely think it's much more likely that you're gonna have a bad experience at a TTT than a top 50 university is all I'm saying. after all, higher ranking universities are more likely to have way nicer facilities.TheMikey wrote:Agreed.. I had a friend who took it where I did and he said it wasn't a good experience because of the proctor. But I had a great proctor, and the 2 other ladies helping her were really nice as well.somethingElse wrote:Dude quality of school has almost nothing to do with how the test is going to go, lol. It matters way more which specific room it's in and the proctors you have. Also others' recent reviews of the place (which it looks like your place has, so good idea then).
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Yeah I remember that one! I think, shit.Keilz wrote:TheMikey wrote:A real one had voters over 50 (this was my 5th section). Tbh, I can't really remember my 2nd LR section because my mind was getting fucked by 2 RC sections lmao, sorry. If I remember one of the questions from my other LR, I will definitely let you guys know.forum_user wrote:Mikey everyone but you got three LR sections, need you to confirm real onesTheMikey wrote:YO HOW'D IT GO!?!?!ayylmao wrote:This is real.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think that was the same as the barking bird question - u remember that?
I need to study what these freaking birds are called now
-
Keilz

- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:35 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
CPA-->JD wrote:Yea had that one.Keilz wrote:Repeating for anyone out there- anyone with two LRs get a barking birds question? That they barked or whatever due to their predators?
It was one of two 26 question section for me
I was so amped up from finishing LG that I had to like take a break and couldn't think clearly on this section! Had the least amount of time left too
-
Kcrowell

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had 3 LRs(25-26-25) and don't remember this one. Did you have 25-26-26? Maybe it was in the fake 26.audaz wrote:posting again because it's driving me crazy.. does anyone with 2 LR's remember a question about cows and their food intake?
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Okay, so minus the timing problem this would have been a VERY easy test for me.R. Jeeves wrote:yeah thank fuck youre here.pretzeltime wrote:it sucks major dick. also, glad that the universe brought us together Jeevesy so I could confirm this madness the second I got home.......... ughR. Jeeves wrote:this sucks dick.Dcc617 wrote:But only if you think it really screwed you. An investigation will hold up scores being released and if something is founded then you either get a free retake (without learning your score) or else you just suck it up and take the score you got today.proteinshake wrote:you guys should collectively complain to LSAC. trying finding others through TLS, Reddit, etc.
how do you think you did on the test though?
my main dilemma is that there was a shit easy LG and the parts of the test that i didnt rush on due to our shitbrain proctor's timing I actually felt pretty good about. I cant really say if ill actually do better on a properly timed retake.
LG first - super easy, I was actually minorly trippin' because I thought it had to be experimental because it was so easy. This section was, I'm pretty sure, cut short by 1 minute or so because all of the dickwads in our room had to pee and the proctor was just like "aight put your pencils down". That would've maaaybe been an excusable mistake and I can't say for sure how early it was ended. I was only mildly uncertain on 1 question, a rule substitution one, which I was deciding between when time was called. I think I went -0 to -2 in this section.
LR second - I was in a chill dream world after great LG and this went really well. I can never exactly predict my LR but I would say -0 to -3
RC experimental 3rd - my hunger kicked in and I took like TWELVE MINUTES on the African weaving shit and then he said 5 minutes left (of course there were actually 7) for the last passage on chem/physics and I basically had a panic blackout and couldn't even finish. PRAISE THE LORD THIS WAS EXPERIMENTAL
RC again - a lot easier, first 3 passages were good, last passage (don't even remember what it was) was slightly harder and, you know, I LOST THE LAST 2 MINUTES so although I bubbled all the answers for the section I could've used more time to make it better. unclear about this but I would say -2 to -4. Oh and I'm minorly tweaking about timing the whole section but I figured surely the proctor would not fuck it up this time. But the general panic did not help.
LR last - at this point I think I am fucking insane because no one else seems to have a problem with the timing but luckily with LR timing is *less* of an issue. Didn't seem too bad. Could have used the whole fucking 35 minutes to check some things, but, this was also probably a -0 to -3 section.
SOOO I agree. Basically this was an easy test with a shitty proctor situation. The timing directly and indirectly affected me. But I would not cancel this or jeopardize it, like you, because I do not know if the next test would go this well
Basically shout out to LG being completely manageable and my nightmare RC being expermintal
otherwise I would be FUCKED.ORG
- proteinshake

- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
no, but that's only one (although a large) factor, which is why I'm talking in terms of likelihood. I also think it's more than a coincidence that every TTT in my state has bad reviews but the T100 Us have good ones. but whatever.R. Jeeves wrote:and the proctors are affiliated with the institution too right?proteinshake wrote:I mean I was exaggerating when I said this but I definitely think it's much more likely that you're gonna have a bad experience at a TTT than a top 50 university is all I'm saying. after all, higher ranking universities are more likely to have way nicer facilities.TheMikey wrote:Agreed.. I had a friend who took it where I did and he said it wasn't a good experience because of the proctor. But I had a great proctor, and the 2 other ladies helping her were really nice as well.somethingElse wrote:Dude quality of school has almost nothing to do with how the test is going to go, lol. It matters way more which specific room it's in and the proctors you have. Also others' recent reviews of the place (which it looks like your place has, so good idea then).
Last edited by proteinshake on Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Keilz

- Posts: 2322
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:35 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Also what about word of mouth marketing?
And teeth whitening?
And teeth whitening?
-
Mikey

- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had one LG, it wasn't so bad for me although I didn't get to finish 1 game which SUCKS. 2 RC's, I'm still wondering which one was real but either way I got fucked by both.ayylmao wrote:Well! Had two LG, one was cake and the other really hard. I think the hard one was real. But still well! You?TheMikey wrote:YO HOW'D IT GO!?!?!ayylmao wrote:This is real.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- audaz

- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:11 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Keilz wrote:Also what about word of mouth marketing?
And teeth whitening?
I had 3 LR so not sure im of much help.. but i remember word of mouth but not teeth whitening
-
etramak

- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
audaz wrote:posting again because it's driving me crazy.. does anyone with 2 LR's remember a question about cows and their food intake?
Nope
- audaz

- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:11 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had 25/26/25 too..Kcrowell wrote:I had 3 LRs(25-26-25) and don't remember this one. Did you have 25-26-26? Maybe it was in the fake 26.audaz wrote:posting again because it's driving me crazy.. does anyone with 2 LR's remember a question about cows and their food intake?
-
longpig

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2015 7:59 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
What did everyone do to celebrate???
I got a fancy hibiscus cocktail and a giant lox bagel at my city's equivalent of katzs
I got a fancy hibiscus cocktail and a giant lox bagel at my city's equivalent of katzs
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
bananus

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:43 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
LG-LR-RC | RC-LR
Actually thought first RC (experimental) was easier, had to rush through the end of real RC. Tokens passage put my brain in a pretzel.
Actually thought first RC (experimental) was easier, had to rush through the end of real RC. Tokens passage put my brain in a pretzel.
-
LMD

- Posts: 60
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:00 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
If the proctor really cut off multiple sections right at 33 minutes, I suspect he may have been a saboteur. That's a pretty bizarre mistake.
Most TTTs have really nice facilities, at least as far as a nice room to take a test in. They might be lacking on libraries and whatnot, but they've been fleecing people for years and at some point when the law school economy was better for them they got financed and built some very nice looking buildings.
Proctoring is something that takes two brain cells. Sure, people at higher institutions are likely to be smarter and more competent, but the effect is pretty minimal when you're talking about the kind of people who are going to proctor anywhere. Nonetheless, proctoring is easy if eyegougingly boring, clerical workers at TTTs easily qualify for the job and are almost never going to make a mistake of consequence.
Most TTTs have really nice facilities, at least as far as a nice room to take a test in. They might be lacking on libraries and whatnot, but they've been fleecing people for years and at some point when the law school economy was better for them they got financed and built some very nice looking buildings.
Proctoring is something that takes two brain cells. Sure, people at higher institutions are likely to be smarter and more competent, but the effect is pretty minimal when you're talking about the kind of people who are going to proctor anywhere. Nonetheless, proctoring is easy if eyegougingly boring, clerical workers at TTTs easily qualify for the job and are almost never going to make a mistake of consequence.
Last edited by LMD on Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Smallville

- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
someone go get a bottle of some type of cinnamon whiskey to kill please, trust me, solid way to celebrate
- NoAngel

- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 2:35 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
My proctor was a mess. I'm taking, alarms going off during the test, messing up directions, having us start and then telling us to stop because their timer wasn't set properly. It's a miracle I managed to finish each section in time.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ayylmao

- Posts: 543
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:38 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Ozone and jury nullification was real.TheMikey wrote:I had one LG, it wasn't so bad for me although I didn't get to finish 1 game which SUCKS. 2 RC's, I'm still wondering which one was real but either way I got fucked by both.ayylmao wrote:Well! Had two LG, one was cake and the other really hard. I think the hard one was real. But still well! You?TheMikey wrote:YO HOW'D IT GO!?!?!ayylmao wrote:This is real.
- ayylmao

- Posts: 543
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:38 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Guys I'm already tipsy.
-
longpig

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2015 7:59 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Yeah wow that was one of the dullest RC passages I've ever readbananus wrote:LG-LR-RC | RC-LR
Actually thought first RC (experimental) was easier, had to rush through the end of real RC. Tokens passage put my brain in a pretzel.
- sluggla

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:12 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
They are called Babblers. They babble.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login