DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS Forum

dasani13 · Post by **dasani13** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:10 pm

Bravo wrote:Can anyone shed some more light on which 25 Q LR section was real? I had 3 LR and found the 2nd one to be particularly difficult.

I had 3 as well and my 2nd one was the experimental (and he hardest). It had a question about school of fish and robotic cars as #1

Shakawkaw · Post by **Shakawkaw** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:10 pm

theleastdiverse wrote:so still trying to determine the experimental..

this is what I have figured:

LR1- 25 questions.. pretty easy, cant remember any details
LG- DEFINETELY 23 questions, easy, colors of rugs
LR2- 24 questions.. tricky i thought... can't be sure what question was in it
RC- 27 questions... mexican community and stealing thunder
LR3- 26 questions... harder the LR1, i was tired, def involved economic growth and interest rates and melatonin

Based on this, and assuming almost definetely that LR3 is real, anyone have insight onto what other LR is experiemtnal? ie. the one with 25 or 24?

I hope to god LR2 was experimental (although I'm concerned because I have this weird feeling that one had the Han Purple in it, but maybe not)

Your last section was real.

MEAhrnsbrak · Post by **MEAhrnsbrak** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:10 pm

mod edit: no talking about topics

A. Nony Mouse · Post by **A. Nony Mouse** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:11 pm

People, please note this in the OP:

Please note that this warning applies to the Reading Comprehension section as well as the writing sample.

SO STOP. BANS INCOMING.

mornincounselor · Post by **mornincounselor** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:11 pm

Post removed.

theleastdiverse · Post by **theleastdiverse** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:14 pm

mornincounselor wrote:We deff have 101 right? I don't want one silly less LR question to funk the curve.

That makes the most sense to me.

That means:

LG -23
RC- 27
LR- 25
LR- 26

for me the LR experimental would have been 24.

anyone help confirm?

ilikebaseball · Post by **ilikebaseball** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:15 pm

Curve will be -13 or -14. Does that usually I dictate 20 or 21 for 165?

dasani13 · Post by **dasani13** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:15 pm

theleastdiverse wrote:
mornincounselor wrote:We deff have 101 right? I don't want one silly less LR question to funk the curve.

That makes the most sense to me.

That means:

LG -23
RC- 27
LR- 25
LR- 26

for me the LR experimental would have been 24.

anyone help confirm?

sounds right to me

gone west · Post by **gone west** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:16 pm

Shakawkaw wrote:
Bravo wrote:Can anyone shed some more light on which 25 Q LR section was real? I had 3 LR and found the 2nd one to be particularly difficult.
First LR for me had a question about column construction, second LR had melatonin. These are the only two I remember.

I remember these. Did you have three LR? Was columns in LR1?

Beasty0219 · Post by **Beasty0219** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:17 pm

Finished my second lg section in like 25 minutes and just knew that it'd be experimental. sooo easy. for some reason the real section (rugs, instruments) tripped me up a bit. lr felt normal if not relatively easy. reading was super dense and will prob drag my score down. last few december tests have been in the -12 to -14 range - hoping that's the case for this one.

longhorn65 · Post by **longhorn65** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:19 pm

Kind of confused on one thing..... I had to LG sections, and from what you all are saying the one about the rug was the real one, BUUUUT I asked a couple of people in my TC afterwards and they said the only games section they had was the one with the cases. WTF?!

Lol I could change the spelling of 2 from to but naaaah post LSAT brain enjoys this fuck up

BrazilBandit · Post by **BrazilBandit** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:21 pm

longhorn65 wrote:Kind of confused on one thing..... I had to LG sections, and from what you all are saying the one about the rug was the real one, BUUUUT I asked a couple of people in my TC afterwards and they said the only games section they had was the one with the cases. WTF?!

TLS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test Center people...

longhorn65 · Post by **longhorn65** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:22 pm

BrazilBandit wrote:
longhorn65 wrote:Kind of confused on one thing..... I had to LG sections, and from what you all are saying the one about the rug was the real one, BUUUUT I asked a couple of people in my TC afterwards and they said the only games section they had was the one with the cases. WTF?!
TLS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test Center people...

agree but it was quite a few people who agreed with this. I wish it was the second one. For some reason I completely froze and answered FAR less than I ever have before

ilikebaseball · Post by **ilikebaseball** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:24 pm

longhorn65 wrote:
BrazilBandit wrote:
longhorn65 wrote:Kind of confused on one thing..... I had to LG sections, and from what you all are saying the one about the rug was the real one, BUUUUT I asked a couple of people in my TC afterwards and they said the only games section they had was the one with the cases. WTF?!
TLS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test Center people...
agree but it was quite a few people who agreed with this

The bullshit rug one was the real. I didn't even have to LGs

HADC10 · Post by **HADC10** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:24 pm

I had LR, LG, LR, RC, LR.

Everything felt pretty good up until the non-experimental last LR section, where I ran out of time (first time that happened) and ended up with six blank by surprise. If I weren't already retaking it I'd definitely cancel.

bob311 · Post by **bob311** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:25 pm

had two rc.
1- games with rugs
2-rc seemed really easy
3-lr can't remember
4-lr melatonin
5-rc stealing thunder

So section 5, the second rc is the real one? I felt that it was much harder than the first rc. Also, games seemed so much easier than the September exam. Like night and day. Couldn't believe my luck.

BrazilBandit · Post by **BrazilBandit** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:26 pm

bob311 wrote:had two rc.
1- games with rugs
2-lr can't remember
3-rc seemed really easy
4-lr melatonin
5-rc stealing thunder

So section 5, the second rc is the real one? I felt that it was much harder than the first rc. Also, games seemed so much easier than the September exam. Like night and day. Couldn't believe my luck.

Second RC is the real one! I was just glad there were no peonies, lilies and snapdragons on this exam...

bob311 · Post by **bob311** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:28 pm

BrazilBandit wrote:
bob311 wrote:had two rc.
1- games with rugs
2-lr can't remember
3-rc seemed really easy
4-lr melatonin
5-rc stealing thunder

So section 5, the second rc is the real one? I felt that it was much harder than the first rc. Also, games seemed so much easier than the September exam. Like night and day. Couldn't believe my luck.
Second RC is the real one! I was just glad there were no peonies, lilies and snapdragons on this exam...

Agreed. I took the September exam in Scotland so I couldn't see which ones I got incorrect but I bet most of the incorrect on games from September came from that game. These ones actually felt like experimental games, too easy honestly. LR was pretty hard all around, I could see an about -10 curve but nothing more than that. Still surprised at the difficulty of the RC. The LSAT is getting harder people. Its evolving.

EDIT: As a September and December taker, I feel like this December exam was 100000% easier than the September. Studied equally hard for both. It just seemed less of a trap. I hope. Who knows, maybe that is why I had to retake it in the first place.

koala-fy · Post by **koala-fy** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:29 pm

Shakawkaw wrote:what the fuck just happened guys.

My thoughts exactly

currently drowning my sorrows in margaritas. Thanks to the LSAT my tolerance is zero and I'm pretty tipsy after half of one

Yeezus · Post by **Yeezus** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:35 pm

BrazilBandit wrote:Second RC is the real one! I was just glad there were no peonies, lilies and snapdragons on this exam...

This was all I could think about as I was doing that game in September.

[youtube]PzDax2H64qA[/youtube]

flash21 · Post by **flash21** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:37 pm

Exp rc may have been my best rc ever. So heart breaking to have rc section 5....

Oskosh · Post by **Oskosh** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:37 pm

LG was hard (the stupid rugs at least)
RC was easy
LR I don't know, I just don't know.

jw316 · Post by **jw316** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:38 pm

koala-fy wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:what the fuck just happened guys.
My thoughts exactly

currently drowning my sorrows in margaritas. Thanks to the LSAT my tolerance is zero and I'm pretty tipsy after half of one

Girl! What!? Check your PMs

dasani13 · Post by **dasani13** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:39 pm

koala-fy wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:what the fuck just happened guys.
My thoughts exactly

currently drowning my sorrows in margaritas. Thanks to the LSAT my tolerance is zero and I'm pretty tipsy after half of one

margaritas!!

gone west · Post by **gone west** » Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:40 pm

Oskosh wrote:LG was hard (the stupid rugs at least)
RC was easy
LR I don't know, I just don't know.

Really? I thought rugs was easier than the photographers.

DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS Forum

When will scores be released?

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Post removed.

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Register for access!

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Register now!

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Re: DECEMBER 2014 WAITERS

Seriously? What are you waiting for?