OCT 2011 Experimental Section Forum

[szb5058]

We still have not figured out why some people who had LR LG LR LR RC had 26/25/26 for their questions and others had 25/26/25. I still do not believe that the 4th section would be experimental. It seems to me that would compromise the fairness of the test. It seems to me that before break/after break can affect scores based on stamina, snack, tiredness etc. I know it sounds like I am talking out of my a** but LSAC has had to have had a reason up to this point for always having the experimental before the break

this person is a downer. thats just what it is. sometimes they change shit up. there is no advantage or disadvantage. the lsac assumes that every lsat taker tries to get the best score possible on each section and timing of the section should have no bearing on its score. otherwise, if lsac recognized fatigue as a factor, everyone would have the same sections at the same time.

[mike22222]

I had 2 LRs. I had LG-LR-RC (break)-RC-LR

alright so "Sewer metal anti-biotics" was real.[/quote]


yup. caqn you remember if that was in your first 3?

[puff0ffluff]

does anyone who did not have a LR exp section remember an LR question on austrailians selling sheep wool?

[neeko]

it looks like there were 2 different LR experimental sections if this many people don't remember having ape mirrors and another batch of people don't remember having ape's nursing.

Does anyone who only had 2 LR's remember ape's nursing in fear of aggression?

I only had 2 LR's and i don't remember this at all.. unless it was in the last couple questions.

It was maqaques with screaming babies. I can't remember what section this was for me.

[mike22222]

does anyone who did not have a LR exp section remember an LR question on austrailians selling sheep wool?

i had 3 LR s and don't remember that....

[gaud]

i had lg-lr-lg-rc-lr and i had no questions about 'apes'

[mike22222]

it is fucked up how those with RC or LG exp can tell which was which but those with 3 LR can't....

[bmp]

I had 2 LRs. I had LG-LR-RC (break)-RC-LR

alright so "Sewer metal anti-biotics" was real.

yup. caqn you remember if that was in your first 3?[/quote]

Don't take my word for it but I want to say it was not in the first three for me... Everything is kind of blurring together though.

[neeko]

it is fucked up how those with RC or LG exp can tell which was which but those with 3 LR can't....

I agree. I have been sitting here trying to figure this out for 7 hours now. There's something wrong with that.

[941law]

alright so "Sewer metal anti-biotics" was real.

yup. caqn you remember if that was in your first 3?

ha nope, I don't remember when/where for any of these. Just trying to assist those that do in hope of someone sorting it all out.

[gaud]

the 'metal' one was DEFINITELY REAL as i had only 2 lr's and that was on one of them

[941law]

mike22, I think I pm'ed you like 30mins ago.

[mike22222]

yes and the fact that I am drinking is probably not helping me me recall facts accurately lol

[neeko]

does anyone who did not have a LR exp section remember an LR question on austrailians selling sheep wool?

i had 3 LR s and don't remember that....

+1. I had 3 as well but no wool. What section was that for you?

[neeko]

Did anyone have killer whales and boat sounds with only 2 LR??

[Bstbll]

my section 4 had the ape question along with old/new flowers and the dog/master question. it had 25 questions

ape mirror question or ape nursing question?


we know this...

Yeah, I had the hot spots question and only had 2 LR.

i dont remember mirrors or the nursing part of any question having to do with apes...i remember the apes had to do with sense of self in my 4th section.

Sense of self was the mirror one. It talked about how things that could recognize themselves in the mirror had a sense of self. And it actually mentioned "giant apes," I'm not just generalizing from some more specific kind of monkey (to the people who were asking about the macaque question).

And really, four accounts? I'm flattered, really, but even I'm not good enough to plant multiple accounts, some with 30-40 posts and others brand new, for the sole purpose of tricking people, after the LSAT when it accomplishes nothing. Thanks though.

[puff0ffluff]

I had 2 LRs. I had LG-LR-RC (break)-RC-LR

alright so "Sewer metal anti-biotics" was real.

yup. caqn you remember if that was in your first 3?[/quote]


does anyone remember how many questions was in the sewer metal anti-bio?

[puff0ffluff]

does anyone who did not have a LR exp section remember an LR question on austrailians selling sheep wool?

i had 3 LR s and don't remember that....

+1. I had 3 as well but no wool. What section was that for you?

3rd LR (I had 25-26-25)

something about international price for wool for a certain family?

[Bstbll]

I had 2 LRs. I had LG-LR-RC (break)-RC-LR

alright so "Sewer metal anti-biotics" was real.

yup. caqn you remember if that was in your first 3?

does anyone remember how many questions was in the sewer metal anti-bio?

25, I'm sure about that one. Only one I am sure about.

[941law]

"I'm sure I would remember that question.."
"I don't know what section it was in but I had it.."
"My girlfriend slept with the proctor.."

we'll never figure this out --ImageRemoved--

[neeko]

You people saying 4th was experimental are trippin. I had killer whales in my LR 3 section 4 and people with only 2 LR had that.

[happyshapy]

-

[happyshapy]

You people saying 4th was experimental are trippin. I had killer whales in my LR 3 section 4 and people with only 2 LR had that.

yeah but there's two different layouts for ppl with 3lrs. I'm pretty positive I had killer whales as my second lr section, 3rd section overall.

[Bstbll]

why do i see fkin people creating new accounts to say that the experimental was the 4th section. Saw 3 people so far. Either there are fuckin trolls coming in to freak people out OR for the first time in lsat history the 4th section was the experimental. im leaning towards the latter, but if you are trying to make people feel like shit you have succeeded.

No seriously don't be rude, I am not trying to freak ANYBODY out I swear on my family I have talked to 3 people now and I am confident my 4th section was experimental!! I'm freaking out too, I wanted it to be the third one and I am in shock/disbelief right now
PS I'm a nice person I'm not trying to make anyone feel like shit hahaha, trust me I am not happy with this either

Some guy created like 3 accounts to try and tell everyone the experimental was the fourth. It is not the fourth. It would make no sense for lsac to put everyone elses before the break, and EVERY TEST UNTIL TODAY before the break, and us lucky ones who had 3 LR got the experimental after the break. Funny how nobody on here can barely remember what they had for breakfast before the test, but you guys are "100% confident that the 4th is experimental". Also, look at the quote above. He changed the guy he quoted to say "im leaning toward the latter", when you if you scroll up and look at his original post he said "im leaning toward the former". Get out of here a**hole, cooley law leaving you with a bunch of time on your hands?

Just saw this, he edited it after I quoted him. It initially said the latter. If you don't believe me, look at qbt's post. He wasn't quoting me, he was quoting rivermaker, and he had "the latter" as well. Unless you're claiming I'm qbt as well, in which case you're just grasping at straws. Nice try though.

[puff0ffluff]

wait! just remembered something:

for anyone who did NOT have "LR 25-26-25", was there a fill-in-the-blank question in the first 8 questions (first two pages of 8 pages) of your 25 section?