check yo lsat scores before you call me TTT lawl 171 <3crumpetsandtea wrote:Uhhhh get yo TTT spelling the fuck out of my thread, damNit!Curry wrote:DAMMIT not damNit
October 2011 Study Log: 180 or Bust! Forum
-
Curry
Re: June 2011 Study Log
- crumpetsandtea

- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
153 for entirely average/mediocre insult. also, lsat doesn't test spelling, obviously.Curry wrote:check yo lsat scores before you call me TTT lawl 171 <3crumpetsandtea wrote:Uhhhh get yo TTT spelling the fuck out of my thread, damNit!Curry wrote:DAMMIT not damNit
-
Curry
Re: June 2011 Study Log
153 > my lsat abilities so credited. also, you want me to link straw's fb spelling thing here?crumpetsandtea wrote:153 for entirely average/mediocre insult. also, lsat doesn't test spelling, obviously.Curry wrote:check yo lsat scores before you call me TTT lawl 171 <3crumpetsandtea wrote:Uhhhh get yo TTT spelling the fuck out of my thread, damNit!Curry wrote:DAMMIT not damNit
-
crumpetsantea

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:10 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
Seriously, no.Curry wrote:DAMMIT not damNit
- Dany

- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
crumpetsantea wrote:Seriously, no.Curry wrote:DAMMIT not damNit
- crumpetsandtea

- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
Dany wrote:crumpetsantea wrote:Seriously, no.Curry wrote:DAMMIT not damNit
-
d34d9823

- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
crumpetsandtea wrote:Dany wrote:crumpetsantea wrote:Seriously, no.Curry wrote:DAMMIT not damNit
-
crumpetsantea

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:10 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
Curry wrote:--ImageRemoved--

-
crumpetsantea

- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:10 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
--ImageRemoved--Curry wrote:... I hate you all
- incompetentia

- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
I never thought I'd say this...
but I'm with Curry on this one
but I'm with Curry on this one
- crumpetsandtea

- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
....WUT.incompetentia wrote:I never thought I'd say this...
but I'm with Curry on this one
--ImageRemoved--
- incompetentia

- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
All I see is Gatriel.
This place has broken my spirit
This place has broken my spirit
- crumpetsandtea

- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
incompetentia wrote:All I see is Gatriel.
This place has broken my spirit
my face as i realized that i'm just as tls-addicted as you are...
- incompetentia

- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
To be fair, that's really a pretty subpar show so I'm not too choked up about it
- crumpetsandtea

- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
49 -- 04/30/11 ----- LR: -3/5 ; RC: -1 ; LG: -2 ------------ 92/172
This was a 5 section PT -- easing myself back into those now that I won't be taking any PTs after work. I used the LG section from PT 46 and got -1.
Timing--I actually ran out of time in the 30 min for LR section 1, and I gave myself an extra 3 minutes. LG I had 3 min left, RC about 1 min, and the last LR about 5.5 minutes (all out of 30 min sections). The breakdown was
1) LG (-2)
2) LR (-3)
3) RC (-1)
4) Exp LG (-1)
5) LR (-5)
I am REALLY LSKFJWEKLFJWE UGH FRUSTRATED by my LR score this time. If I had performed normally, I would definitely have gotten above a 175...but nope. Sighhh. A lot (all) of the questions I missed, I had been choosing between TCR and chose wrong in the end.
Very, very frustrating. Boooo. But I AM glad the curve was forgiving, so I still scored above a 170. Also, my RC was pretty good this time! I think maybe this marks the shift into easier RC/harder LR tests? We'll see. The LG mistakes were both stupid mistakes (forgot a rule & mis-circled an answer).
Now off to go drink away my upset-ness XD
This was a 5 section PT -- easing myself back into those now that I won't be taking any PTs after work. I used the LG section from PT 46 and got -1.
Timing--I actually ran out of time in the 30 min for LR section 1, and I gave myself an extra 3 minutes. LG I had 3 min left, RC about 1 min, and the last LR about 5.5 minutes (all out of 30 min sections). The breakdown was
1) LG (-2)
2) LR (-3)
3) RC (-1)
4) Exp LG (-1)
5) LR (-5)
I am REALLY LSKFJWEKLFJWE UGH FRUSTRATED by my LR score this time. If I had performed normally, I would definitely have gotten above a 175...but nope. Sighhh. A lot (all) of the questions I missed, I had been choosing between TCR and chose wrong in the end.
Very, very frustrating. Boooo. But I AM glad the curve was forgiving, so I still scored above a 170. Also, my RC was pretty good this time! I think maybe this marks the shift into easier RC/harder LR tests? We'll see. The LG mistakes were both stupid mistakes (forgot a rule & mis-circled an answer).
Now off to go drink away my upset-ness XD
- mickeyD

- Posts: 357
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:43 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
...you're getting 172 with 30 minute sections? You, sir, are gonna be one happy camper around the end of June.
- incompetentia

- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
Don't the RC get more difficult as you transition into the newer tests?
Maybe I'm just weird.
Maybe I'm just weird.
-
Curry
Re: June 2011 Study Log
Everything gets harder the later you get but the curves become more generous (with the exception of LR I guess but even that gets harder)incompetentia wrote:Don't the RC get more difficult as you transition into the newer tests?
Maybe I'm just weird.
- crumpetsandtea

- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
Hahahaha d'awwwwmickeyD wrote:...you're getting 172 with 30 minute sections? You, sir, are gonna be one happy camper around the end of June.
I thought RC didnt get harder until the late 50s? I'm not sure though...either way, generous curves are what saved me. I reeeeaaallly hope my LR average doesn't drop :\Curry wrote:Everything gets harder the later you get but the curves become more generous (with the exception of LR I guess but even that gets harder)incompetentia wrote:Don't the RC get more difficult as you transition into the newer tests? Maybe I'm just weird.
-
Curry
Re: June 2011 Study Log
You're right. I believe games get easy from 50-55 and you have -9 curves for a while. 55-61 = hard(er) RC, games like the 30's, and harder than average LR.
- crumpetsandtea

- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
50 -- 05/04/11 ----- LR: -1/2 ; RC: -4 ; LG: -0 ------------ 93/173
and
51 -- 05/08/11 ----- LR: -2/2 ; RC: -4 ; LG: -0 ------------ 91/172
I seem to be stuck in this weird fucking spot of 170-173.
I am not pleased with this. If I experience any dips from my PT average on the day of, I could end up below 170 again, in which case I'd have to commit seppuku....and I really don't want to commit seppuku. 
My clear weakness is RC, but I just CAN'T SEEM TO FUCKING CHANGE MY SCORE. In PT 50, i missed 3 questions from the same passage, and in PT 51, they were all over the lace. I just don't know what to do. I think maybe I'll try to pick up the Manhattan RC guide, or Atlas RC, or whatever, at Borders if I can after work tomorrow. I seem to be doing decently on LG now with the -0s, and LR is sorta/kinda consistent :\ It's just that damn RC!!!! Though if I could get down to -0 on a LR, that'd be nice. I just don't know what to do.
and
51 -- 05/08/11 ----- LR: -2/2 ; RC: -4 ; LG: -0 ------------ 91/172
I seem to be stuck in this weird fucking spot of 170-173.
My clear weakness is RC, but I just CAN'T SEEM TO FUCKING CHANGE MY SCORE. In PT 50, i missed 3 questions from the same passage, and in PT 51, they were all over the lace. I just don't know what to do. I think maybe I'll try to pick up the Manhattan RC guide, or Atlas RC, or whatever, at Borders if I can after work tomorrow. I seem to be doing decently on LG now with the -0s, and LR is sorta/kinda consistent :\ It's just that damn RC!!!! Though if I could get down to -0 on a LR, that'd be nice. I just don't know what to do.
- crumpetsandtea

- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
53 -- 05/08/11 ----- LR: -1/2 ; RC: -4 ; LG: -0 ------------ 93/174 ----- 5 sect @ 1. Waiting to get my RC guide!
Soooo not much change in terms of my scores. -0 LG as usual, a -3 total on both LR sections, a -4 on RC. I'm eagerly awaiting my Manhattan RC guide in the hopes that I can pound it out in the next week and see at least a liiiittle improvement on RC.
Definitely feeling those nerves! >_< One thing I'm glad about from today is that I woke up early, worked out, showered, ate something, listened to music...generally got a chance to set a little bit of a schedule. Hopefully I can maintain this schedule format until the day of the test!! (:
Soooo not much change in terms of my scores. -0 LG as usual, a -3 total on both LR sections, a -4 on RC. I'm eagerly awaiting my Manhattan RC guide in the hopes that I can pound it out in the next week and see at least a liiiittle improvement on RC.
Definitely feeling those nerves! >_< One thing I'm glad about from today is that I woke up early, worked out, showered, ate something, listened to music...generally got a chance to set a little bit of a schedule. Hopefully I can maintain this schedule format until the day of the test!! (:
- crumpetsandtea

- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: June 2011 Study Log
53 -- 05/14/11 ----- LR: -3/3 ; RC: -4 ; LG: -0 ------------ 91/170 ----- Sigh. Guessed right on @ least 2 RC qs...so kinda lucky
Could have been worse, I guess. This time around, the LR is what dragged my score down. I'm happy that I can be consistent with LG at least, but I really want to stop slipping below -2 for LR. Stiiiilll waiting on my Manhattan RC Guide. Should be here by this Wednesday, then I can power through it in the next week or so.
Haven't taken a close look at the questions I missed yet, but will update with that information.
Could have been worse, I guess. This time around, the LR is what dragged my score down. I'm happy that I can be consistent with LG at least, but I really want to stop slipping below -2 for LR. Stiiiilll waiting on my Manhattan RC Guide. Should be here by this Wednesday, then I can power through it in the next week or so.
Haven't taken a close look at the questions I missed yet, but will update with that information.