knowyourself wrote:and even on the date, prep to score.

knowyourself wrote:and even on the date, prep to score.
Nah, but I'm just...different. (I know that sounds trite. I apologize.)WaltGrace83 wrote:REALLY impressed that you even got WL'd with a 161. You are wayyyyyy below median with that score. Did you cure cancer?
Because it was a year ago and this past year has been pretty crazy, I don't remember my exact process. But I explained some of it a few posts above, what I can remember.WaltGrace83 wrote: (4) What was your process the first time? We want details.
(5) What is your score breakdown? For example: LR -5, LG -4, RC - 10.
(6) At a 161, you are solid on fundamentals. Work mostly on weaknesses. If you don't know what those are, find out!
(7) The key is review. By that, I mean "blind review."
Totes ma goats.Straw_Mandible wrote:Agreed. Unless the date involves flowers, a movie, and dinner at an expensive restaurant.WaltGrace83 wrote: Prep to a SCORE, not a DATE.
Nothing to be worried about, man. It's all about the end result.Louis1127 wrote:Thank God you posted this, Walt. I feel like I am way behind for 3 and 1/3 months studying, but I feel like even though I have improved alot, I still have potential to improve significantly.WaltGrace83 wrote: I thought I would be done drilling by the end of February - it's April and I feel like I haven't even scratched the surface of my true capabilities.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
louierodriguez wrote:No matter what happens I'll know this process of studying has given me something.
It's given me a drive to learn something. It's showed me what the life of a law student will be like and I can honestly say that it's the sort of life that I would like to live.
I may not have as much natural ability as some of you, but I can sit in the library and work just as hard as anybody.
Anyways... no matter what I score... whether its a 150, 160, 170, 180... I'm excited about the future.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhzNSPiqO0M
Congrats on the endurance! I would still recommend slowing down a little though. As others have stated, it is all about quality and not quantity. It is vital that you spend most of your time reviewing, and not simply doing as many questions as you can.louierodriguez wrote:Well, I'm going to be honest guys...
Scored a 153 on the first PT today.
Then scored a 155 on the second PT.
Obviously I'm not thrilled with the results, but I am pretty confident in my stamina. I am pretty exhausted, but I know I could have taken a third if I really wanted.
I remember a few months ago I couldn't get through the first section of a PT without freaking out and having a mental breakdown.
With 60 days I hope to make some significant gains. I'm considering taking an LSAT course with an instructor. It's like $800 and I think I'd feel a lot better in the future knowing I tried everything possible to score higher.
I don't know whats going on with my logic games ability. Today I had -10 in PT 39 and then in PT 40 there was one game that I couldn't even figure out.
Anyways... with my goals a 160-165 is all I really need. I still would love to go to a T14 but UF or UM would be completely fine.
Still after a 180 though!
The LG scores are inexcusable and you need to bring those way down. Are you drilling LG?louierodriguez wrote:PT 39
LG -10
LR -7
LR -9
RC -10
PT40
LR -9
LG -7
LR -11
RC -8
Tomorrow's review should be interesting. I guess I'm struggling equally in all areas.
*goes and hides last PT LG section score*WaltGrace83 wrote: The LG scores are inexcusable
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
To those of you struggling with LG...take it from someone who was in the same boat. After proper reviewing and drilling, I now LOOK FORWARD to this section and pray to god that it's also my experimental. I consider it another break in the exam...it's actually kind of fun! Drill til you fill your...grill...with...skill....tfinndogm wrote:*goes and hides last PT LG section score*WaltGrace83 wrote: The LG scores are inexcusable
....
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
How are you reviewing? Honestly if you're still missing that many, I think it's time to ditch PTs for a while and drill drill drill.louierodriguez wrote:PT 39
LG -10
LR -7
LR -9
RC -10
PT40
LR -9
LG -7
LR -11
RC -8
Tomorrow's review should be interesting. I guess I'm struggling equally in all areas.
Are you referring to the website/book? The site has a few schedules (I would use the 8 week one) that reference the book so I assume you need to buy the book as well.santoki wrote: The LSAT Trainer has a plan built in!
Yep I'm referring to that schedule. Of course you have to buy the book! In my opinion Trainer and MLSAT are the most credited and MUST-HAVEs. Actual tests are also built into the Trainer schedule, because it tells you to buy a book of 10 actual LSATs.leigh912198972 wrote:Are you referring to the website/book? The site has a few schedules (I would use the 8 week one) that reference the book so I assume you need to buy the book as well.santoki wrote: The LSAT Trainer has a plan built in!
There's just so many books! Manhattan, LSAT trainer, and then actual tests. I'm confused on what to get and how to plan it out.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Extremely important. Optimal performance on this test depends on so much more than just knowledge of the material/ability to answer question types correctly in isolation.leigh912198972 wrote:How important is it to do 5 sections in one sitting rather than 4? I know the real test is 5, and PT's are 4. I know the idea is to get your brain ready for the additional work that 5 sections takes over 4, but does it really matter?
Anyone have a strong opinion either way?
I don't know why, but I totally pictured the above quote being said by Optimus Prime.Straw_Mandible wrote:This is not just a test of your knowledge. This is a test of your mental discipline. That's why we train this way.
Fun fact: At the risk of outing myself to future adcoms, I am Optimus Prime.leigh912198972 wrote:I don't know why, but I totally pictured the above quote being said by Optimus Prime.Straw_Mandible wrote:This is not just a test of your knowledge. This is a test of your mental discipline. That's why we train this way.
http://youtu.be/bCwZJa35u_Q
For real though, makes sense. Thank you guys.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login