RC: -3

Now watch me go -8 on the next RC section I do. So volatile...
It's not all about LSAT score but it still helps... GPA difference might have something to do with it too but that is just me speculating. Regardless soliciting waivers can also have good results.BitterSplitter wrote:I dont think its about his score. I got an email, a few waiver, and a packet in the mail (today actually) from U Minn with a 166. Did you ever check any box on any test or form asking not to disclose your results to anyone? That may be it.finnandjake2 wrote:
I bet you'd be getting them if you had a 167 instead of a 166. Just saying. There is a huge difference between the 25% and median at Minnesota and there 75% isn't much higher. 158/167/168 or something along those lines.
+1finnandjake2 wrote:It's not all about LSAT score but it still helps... GPA difference might have something to do with it too but that is just me speculating. Regardless soliciting waivers can also have good results.BitterSplitter wrote:I dont think its about his score. I got an email, a few waiver, and a packet in the mail (today actually) from U Minn with a 166. Did you ever check any box on any test or form asking not to disclose your results to anyone? That may be it.finnandjake2 wrote:
I bet you'd be getting them if you had a 167 instead of a 166. Just saying. There is a huge difference between the 25% and median at Minnesota and there 75% isn't much higher. 158/167/168 or something along those lines.
I am getting Charlotte School of Law . . .HawkeyeGirl wrote:The fee waivers are reallllly weird. People with the same numbers definitely do not always get the same stuff. Minnesota specifically sent me information about their JD/MBA program, probably because I had a Finance degree and 2-4 years WE. I think UG major and WE are actually big factors in determining who gets a waiver or not (obviously along with the stats)BitterSplitter wrote:I dont think its about his score. I got an email, a few waiver, and a packet in the mail (today actually) from U Minn with a 166. Did you ever check any box on any test or form asking not to disclose your results to anyone? That may be it.finnandjake2 wrote:
I bet you'd be getting them if you had a 167 instead of a 166. Just saying. There is a huge difference between the 25% and median at Minnesota and there 75% isn't much higher. 158/167/168 or something along those lines.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
I'm getting lots of talk from MN but no fee waiving. Which I suppose is smart of them because I'll probably apply anyway. Gabe I'm 3.66 164 with 5 years WE and getting mostly garbage TTTT emails. Good school emails have tended to not have fee waivers in them.HawkeyeGirl wrote:The fee waivers are reallllly weird. People with the same numbers definitely do not always get the same stuff. Minnesota specifically sent me information about their JD/MBA program, probably because I had a Finance degree and 2-4 years WE. I think UG major and WE are actually big factors in determining who gets a waiver or not (obviously along with the stats)BitterSplitter wrote:I dont think its about his score. I got an email, a few waiver, and a packet in the mail (today actually) from U Minn with a 166. Did you ever check any box on any test or form asking not to disclose your results to anyone? That may be it.finnandjake2 wrote:
I bet you'd be getting them if you had a 167 instead of a 166. Just saying. There is a huge difference between the 25% and median at Minnesota and there 75% isn't much higher. 158/167/168 or something along those lines.
I'm ditching the old PTs too. They suck.Wormfather wrote:Dear PTs older than 40:
Why have you been so mean to me? Your games are cruel, your LR is ambiguous and filled with EXCEPT questions. Everything about you is stank. I dont take you, I survive you. Its like going from Carlo from The Godfather, to Ike Turner to Chris Brown.
No, bafangool, you!
I'm getting married to PT68 in less than two weeks and you're making me question my love for it. I realize now that I'm into the newer more vibrant PTs, yeah they still play games but there's none of this unbalanced, undefined, in and out stuff. More of a one grouping, one ordering and then two of "something else for fun" types.
So you see, I'm walking away now, you're ruining my confidence. You make me beg for subzones. Seeing as how PT68 will be my final shot at making this work, this is goodbye forever. Best of luck.
Your's Truly,
Worm
The modern PT's are so much "tighter," which is nice.Wormfather wrote:Now I understand how you could get into Harvard with a 165 back then.Alorain wrote:I'm ditching the old PTs too. They suck.Wormfather wrote:Dear PTs older than 40:
Why have you been so mean to me? Your games are cruel, your LR is ambiguous and filled with EXCEPT questions. Everything about you is stank. I dont take you, I survive you. Its like going from Carlo from The Godfather, to Ike Turner to Chris Brown.
No, bafangool, you!
I'm getting married to PT68 in less than two weeks and you're making me question my love for it. I realize now that I'm into the newer more vibrant PTs, yeah they still play games but there's none of this unbalanced, undefined, in and out stuff. More of a one grouping, one ordering and then two of "something else for fun" types.
So you see, I'm walking away now, you're ruining my confidence. You make me beg for subzones. Seeing as how PT68 will be my final shot at making this work, this is goodbye forever. Best of luck.
Your's Truly,
Worm
Are all of you guys following his guide?GabeQuixote wrote:Noodley's Guide was quite clear. 1-39 were good for drills. PT 40 - 67 were good for timed practice and full tests.
C'mon nao.
He got a 179. That's sufficient for me to follow his guide, albeit on a compressed timeline.Lenahan3 wrote:Are all of you guys following his guide?GabeQuixote wrote:Noodley's Guide was quite clear. 1-39 were good for drills. PT 40 - 67 were good for timed practice and full tests.
C'mon nao.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
I can honestly say that guide has helped me tremendously!Lenahan3 wrote:Are all of you guys following his guide?GabeQuixote wrote:Noodley's Guide was quite clear. 1-39 were good for drills. PT 40 - 67 were good for timed practice and full tests.
C'mon nao.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
+1, good way of putting itPickledPanda wrote:Sometimes things happen during the day that really make the LSAT feel less important.
I know most of you know this already, but I think keeping the right perspective on the LSAT can really bring clarity. In turn, that clarity can help you focus and let go of some of the stress from studying.
Hope everyone is having a nice day!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I would buy you some food!gguuueessttt wrote:I'm hungry as fuck and have no food and less than a dollar on me right now. Sooo excited for Thanksgiving.
Double thank you!PickledPanda wrote:I would buy you some food!gguuueessttt wrote:I'm hungry as fuck and have no food and less than a dollar on me right now. Sooo excited for Thanksgiving.
Edit nice post number!
"So shines a good deed in a weary world."BitterSplitter wrote:Your future blessing (URM status app cycle) is your current burden (lack of fee waivers). Don't worry about it, you'll be getting accepted tomorrow by at least one of the schools you're upset at for not giving you a fee waiver today.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login