Like in a pick-up game of basketball, would you say something like, "I do, nonetheless, concede that a foul remains a possibility (I may have fouled you), yet the evidence leads us to conclude your scenario as being highly unlikely. If, however, we are mistaken in these deductions (not to be confused with reversals) you have -- at least my own -- heartfelt sympathies, and you are welcome to take the customary two free shots, also known as "free throws."I do, nonetheless, concede that your story remains a possibility (although quite a few things in this world are possible), yet the evidence leads us to conclude your scenario as being highly unlikely.
If, however, we are mistaken in these deductions (not to be confused with reversals) you have -- at least my own -- heartfelt sympathies. If you need legal advice, talk to an attorney -- not to us -- who specializes in LSAC litigation.
February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!) Forum
- Kit Cloudkicker
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:58 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:11 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
Didn't know Maxine Waters was awaiting an LSAT score.LSATDecimator wrote:There can be no peace without justice.
There can be no justice without scores.
There is no peace...
- LSATDecimator
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Kit Cloudkicker wrote:LSATDecimator wrote: Yes, but you said it was already on the news. How could something be on the news and not show up in a Google search. I do, nonetheless, concede that your story remains a possibility (although quite a few things in this world are possible), yet the evidence leads us to conclude your scenario as being highly unlikely.
If, however, we are mistaken in these deductions (not to be confused with reversals) you have -- at least my own -- heartfelt sympathies. If you need legal advice, talk to an attorney -- not to us -- who specializes in LSAC litigation.
Do you talk like this in real life? In everyday conversation?
I always try and cater my speaking and writing to the level of intelligence possessed by the listener/reader. Sorry to have exceeded yours.
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:00 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
Conceited Bastard. @Brenda_TaughtMe Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Thanks!!!! RT @SerieuseBlack: My boo @Brenda_TaughtMe got a 171 on his LSAT! You go boy!
- Kit Cloudkicker
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:58 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
LSATDecimator wrote:Kit Cloudkicker wrote:LSATDecimator wrote: Yes, but you said it was already on the news. How could something be on the news and not show up in a Google search. I do, nonetheless, concede that your story remains a possibility (although quite a few things in this world are possible), yet the evidence leads us to conclude your scenario as being highly unlikely.
If, however, we are mistaken in these deductions (not to be confused with reversals) you have -- at least my own -- heartfelt sympathies. If you need legal advice, talk to an attorney -- not to us -- who specializes in LSAC litigation.
Do you talk like this in real life? In everyday conversation?
I always try and cater my speaking and writing to the level of intelligence possessed by the listener/reader. Sorry to have exceeded yours.
Ahhhh... I see what you did there. Clever.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
Mother of god. What's the time and date on the twat?ampersand5 wrote:Conceited Bastard. @Brenda_TaughtMe Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Thanks!!!! RT @SerieuseBlack: My boo @Brenda_TaughtMe got a 171 on his LSAT! You go boy!
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:00 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
EDIT: go to monitter.com and enter LSATJasmine Fernando @jasferna Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Apparantly i will be getting my LSAT score today.... O_O
(i imagine these people are misinformed but im still curious.
Last edited by ampersand5 on Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
Yeah reading through history now...wtfffampersand5 wrote:Conceited Bastard. @Brenda_TaughtMe Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Thanks!!!! RT @SerieuseBlack: My boo @Brenda_TaughtMe got a 171 on his LSAT! You go boy!
- agcl0913
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:49 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
ampersand, you keep building our hopes up, only for them to be shot down.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
Someone just tweetedFinallyGoing wrote:Yeah reading through history now...wtfffampersand5 wrote:Conceited Bastard. @Brenda_TaughtMe Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Thanks!!!! RT @SerieuseBlack: My boo @Brenda_TaughtMe got a 171 on his LSAT! You go boy!
"killed my first LSAT"
practice test or real thing?
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:11 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
Oh god. Is this real? Is this happening?
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
The people who keep tweeting this:
"We can udnretsnad any msseed up stnecene as lnog as the lsat and frsit leterts of the wdros are in crrcoet plaecs."
...are really annoying
"We can udnretsnad any msseed up stnecene as lnog as the lsat and frsit leterts of the wdros are in crrcoet plaecs."
...are really annoying
- agcl0913
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:49 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
hahahahahahabernaldiaz wrote:The people who keep tweeting this:
"We can udnretsnad any msseed up stnecene as lnog as the lsat and frsit leterts of the wdros are in crrcoet plaecs."
...are really annoying
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Kit Cloudkicker
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:58 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
LSATDecimator wrote:Kit Cloudkicker wrote:LSATDecimator wrote: Yes, but you said it was already on the news. How could something be on the news and not show up in a Google search. I do, nonetheless, concede that your story remains a possibility (although quite a few things in this world are possible), yet the evidence leads us to conclude your scenario as being highly unlikely.
If, however, we are mistaken in these deductions (not to be confused with reversals) you have -- at least my own -- heartfelt sympathies. If you need legal advice, talk to an attorney -- not to us -- who specializes in LSAC litigation.
Do you talk like this in real life? In everyday conversation?
I always try and cater my speaking and writing to the level of intelligence possessed by the listener/reader. Sorry to have exceeded yours.
Btw... I never said I didn't understand what you wrote. I was just curious as to why you choose to talk like a pretentious douchebag.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
If you read his post history, it's pretty interesting hahaKit Cloudkicker wrote:
Btw... I never said I didn't understand what you wrote. I was just curious as to why you choose to talk like a pretentious douchebag.
- Skunky Bumps
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:24 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Jesus Christ. What is it about this website that turns everyone into bickering assholes? If it's not this, it's some snotty comment about anticipated scores. I mean I realize the internet is SRS BSNS, but it's just nonstop with this inane bullshit.Kit Cloudkicker wrote:LSATDecimator wrote:Kit Cloudkicker wrote:LSATDecimator wrote: Yes, but you said it was already on the news. How could something be on the news and not show up in a Google search. I do, nonetheless, concede that your story remains a possibility (although quite a few things in this world are possible), yet the evidence leads us to conclude your scenario as being highly unlikely.
If, however, we are mistaken in these deductions (not to be confused with reversals) you have -- at least my own -- heartfelt sympathies. If you need legal advice, talk to an attorney -- not to us -- who specializes in LSAC litigation.
Do you talk like this in real life? In everyday conversation?
I always try and cater my speaking and writing to the level of intelligence possessed by the listener/reader. Sorry to have exceeded yours.
Btw... I never said I didn't understand what you wrote. I was just curious as to why you choose to talk like a pretentious douchebag.
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:52 pm
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:11 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
False alarm. Look at the tweets underneath:bernaldiaz wrote:Someone just tweetedFinallyGoing wrote:Yeah reading through history now...wtfffampersand5 wrote:Conceited Bastard. @Brenda_TaughtMe Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Thanks!!!! RT @SerieuseBlack: My boo @Brenda_TaughtMe got a 171 on his LSAT! You go boy!
"killed my first LSAT"
practice test or real thing?
--ImageRemoved--
We still can't be sure, but given the context, it definitely looks like he's referring to his first practice test.
- Skunky Bumps
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:24 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
"I got my LSAT scores back next week!!!!!"FinallyGoing wrote:http://twitter.com/#!/search/lsat%20fro ... a_TaughtMe
I think this guy is a liar.
Me thinks he also can't conjugate.
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
Pssh, I'm sure he will done just fine.Skunky Bumps wrote:"I got my LSAT scores back next week!!!!!"FinallyGoing wrote:http://twitter.com/#!/search/lsat%20fro ... a_TaughtMe
I think this guy is a liar.
Me thinks he also can't conjugate.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
Yeah I think the twats are false alarms. Surely SOMEONE from TLS will hear in the first wave. The odds that a wave of emails going out without one of us having actual proof is slim to none.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:11 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
Barring any problems springing from the alleged Tampa incident, I think it'll come out Monday as all of us expected.bernaldiaz wrote:Yeah I think the twats are false alarms. Surely SOMEONE from TLS will hear in the first wave. The odds that a wave of emails going out without one of us having actual proof is slim to none.
- wakka!
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:23 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
ross1004 wrote: Barring any problems springing from the alleged Tampa incident, I think it'll come out Monday as all of us expected.
Actually speak for yourself, my dreams gave me a premonition leading me to believe that we won't get the scores back until Wednesday.
- wakka!
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:23 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
bernaldiaz wrote:Yeah I think the twats are false alarms. Surely SOMEONE from TLS will hear in the first wave. The odds that a wave of emails going out without one of us having actual proof is slim to none.
The real poll should be "When will we get our scores back?
-Saturday
-Sunday-
-Monday
-Tuesday
-Wednesday
-Later than Wednesday due to Tampa Incident???"
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:11 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!)
+1wakka! wrote:bernaldiaz wrote:Yeah I think the twats are false alarms. Surely SOMEONE from TLS will hear in the first wave. The odds that a wave of emails going out without one of us having actual proof is slim to none.
The real poll should be "When will we get our scores back?
-Saturday
-Sunday-
-Monday
-Tuesday
-Wednesday
-Later than Wednesday due to Tampa Incident???"
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login