So -8 is actually a real possibility???? WTFwmbuff wrote:Damn, there's even been a couple -8's.sev wrote:Looks like a few times:Lxwind wrote:Was there ever a -9 before June?
https://www.powerscore.com/lsat/help/co ... rgeted.cfm

So -8 is actually a real possibility???? WTFwmbuff wrote:Damn, there's even been a couple -8's.sev wrote:Looks like a few times:Lxwind wrote:Was there ever a -9 before June?
https://www.powerscore.com/lsat/help/co ... rgeted.cfm
I hope we can solve this tonightLxwind wrote:I had 3 LRs, with 25,25,26 questions, and I'm sure about that...notharveyspecter wrote:I only had 2 LR sections, and I think I had two 26s (see earlier post about questioning two 26 sections vs. transfer error) and I saw someone else post they had two 26 sections too. So, I'm saying there's a chanceLalalsat96 wrote:Rc was so hard! I actually just skimmed the last passahe and guessed answers for the last 5. Thank God for the easy LG. I FINISHED WITH EXTRA TIMEand that barely happens.
Wait so i had 3 LR sections. One was 25 and two were 26. Is there any chance the experimental was the 25 question one?
Is that honestly really necessary? Are you just concerned of the implications of your decision on others in the future?merdblah wrote:"Honestly judging if I need to cancel"creed wrote:we need a good thread nickname like June had
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Should probably perform some calculations and see how it weighs out.saf18hornet wrote:Is that honestly really necessary? Are you just concerned of the implications of your decision on others in the future?merdblah wrote:"Honestly judging if I need to cancel"creed wrote:we need a good thread nickname like June had
About this drunkdm1683 wrote:Sooooo....how did it go, and how drunk are you all getting tonight?
CottonHarvest wrote:100Walliums wrote:Who feels personally victimized by the judges passage?
Idk the answer, but i think you can say the number.Barry grandpapy wrote:Was "investment in science and a healthy economy" real or experimental? I can solve the LR(25) LG LR( 25) LR(26) RC combo if someone knows
Am I allowed to say what number this was?
I wish I could join you all in spirit but I'm resting my liver for the packer game tomorrow night.Barry grandpapy wrote:About this drunkdm1683 wrote:Sooooo....how did it go, and how drunk are you all getting tonight?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
It was easy for me as well..took me about 6~7 minutes thoughcreed wrote:Is there consensus on Marx/Freud?
I thought it was extremely easy but I'm seeing otherwise on r/LSAT. I think I finished it in 4 minutes or so. Wondering if I overlooked some stuff. But I can see how Judges may have made it feel rough.
I feel like it would have been easy if I didn't waste so much time on judges. Had to skim and rush the questions. Should have done that one first.Lxwind wrote:It was easy for me as well..took me about 6~7 minutes thoughcreed wrote:Is there consensus on Marx/Freud?
I thought it was extremely easy but I'm seeing otherwise on r/LSAT. I think I finished it in 4 minutes or so. Wondering if I overlooked some stuff. But I can see how Judges may have made it feel rough.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
We doing a title pun or nah?Barry grandpapy wrote:.
Well i guess this is good news overall. Means there is a chance the 2nd LR I did and which I felt was easiest might be real and the one I struggled most with (section 1) may be an experimental. Could be a huge point difference for me depending on the outcome.greenmusic97 wrote:My take: two test forms today with that order, one with exp 1 and the other with exp 3. Check topics here: forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic…
Guys... From Jon Denning (powerscore)
So if your order was LR, LG, LR, LR, RC, some people's LR exp was 1, some 3. This is a first and I'm so annoyed. I don't think we're ever gonna figure this out. I'm gonna be in pain until scores are released.
Let's do it. 1st four suggestions get on the pollabujabal wrote:We doing a title pun or nah?Barry grandpapy wrote:.
Don't mind the hackneyed "tagging" system
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
"Divebombing the Judges Passage"Barry grandpapy wrote:Let's do it. 1st four suggestions get on the pollabujabal wrote:We doing a title pun or nah?Barry grandpapy wrote:.
Don't mind the hackneyed "tagging" system
I walked out of the testing center and my friend greeted me with a rum and coke. Haven't stopped since.dm1683 wrote:Sooooo....how did it go, and how drunk are you all getting tonight?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login