So -8 is actually a real possibility???? WTFwmbuff wrote:Damn, there's even been a couple -8's.sev wrote:Looks like a few times:Lxwind wrote:Was there ever a -9 before June?
https://www.powerscore.com/lsat/help/co ... rgeted.cfm
-11 Curve, September 2017 Waiter's Thread Forum
-
Lxwind

- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:30 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
-
Barry grandpapy

- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I hope we can solve this tonightLxwind wrote:I had 3 LRs, with 25,25,26 questions, and I'm sure about that...notharveyspecter wrote:I only had 2 LR sections, and I think I had two 26s (see earlier post about questioning two 26 sections vs. transfer error) and I saw someone else post they had two 26 sections too. So, I'm saying there's a chanceLalalsat96 wrote:Rc was so hard! I actually just skimmed the last passahe and guessed answers for the last 5. Thank God for the easy LG. I FINISHED WITH EXTRA TIMEand that barely happens.
Wait so i had 3 LR sections. One was 25 and two were 26. Is there any chance the experimental was the 25 question one?
-
saf18hornet

- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Is that honestly really necessary? Are you just concerned of the implications of your decision on others in the future?merdblah wrote:"Honestly judging if I need to cancel"creed wrote:we need a good thread nickname like June had
-
dm1683

- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Sooooo....how did it go, and how drunk are you all getting tonight? 
-
Barry grandpapy

- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Was "investment in science and a healthy economy" real or experimental? I can solve the LR(25) LG LR( 25) LR(26) RC combo if someone knows
Am I allowed to say what number this was?
Am I allowed to say what number this was?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
merdblah

- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:53 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Should probably perform some calculations and see how it weighs out.saf18hornet wrote:Is that honestly really necessary? Are you just concerned of the implications of your decision on others in the future?merdblah wrote:"Honestly judging if I need to cancel"creed wrote:we need a good thread nickname like June had
-
Barry grandpapy

- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
About this drunkdm1683 wrote:Sooooo....how did it go, and how drunk are you all getting tonight?
-
ddavise

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2017 2:46 am
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
CottonHarvest wrote:100Walliums wrote:Who feels personally victimized by the judges passage?
-
greenmusic97

- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 8:41 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Idk the answer, but i think you can say the number.Barry grandpapy wrote:Was "investment in science and a healthy economy" real or experimental? I can solve the LR(25) LG LR( 25) LR(26) RC combo if someone knows
Am I allowed to say what number this was?
-
dm1683

- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I wish I could join you all in spirit but I'm resting my liver for the packer game tomorrow night.Barry grandpapy wrote:About this drunkdm1683 wrote:Sooooo....how did it go, and how drunk are you all getting tonight?
-
mxhenry

- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2017 4:57 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Who's in Brooklyn??? I need to vent 
-
Lalalsat96

- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:35 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
For those with LR(25) LG LR(26) LR (26) RC like me its its probably LR 25 (my section 1) and 26 (section 4) or at least im hoping bc i skipped a question on section 3 and usually i have a minute or two to spare in LR but section 3 was pretty hard so hoping it was my experimental.
- creed

- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:08 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Is there consensus on Marx/Freud?
I thought it was extremely easy but I'm seeing otherwise on r/LSAT. I think I finished it in 4 minutes or so. Wondering if I overlooked some stuff. But I can see how Judges may have made it feel rough.
I thought it was extremely easy but I'm seeing otherwise on r/LSAT. I think I finished it in 4 minutes or so. Wondering if I overlooked some stuff. But I can see how Judges may have made it feel rough.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Lxwind

- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:30 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
It was easy for me as well..took me about 6~7 minutes thoughcreed wrote:Is there consensus on Marx/Freud?
I thought it was extremely easy but I'm seeing otherwise on r/LSAT. I think I finished it in 4 minutes or so. Wondering if I overlooked some stuff. But I can see how Judges may have made it feel rough.
-
merdblah

- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:53 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I feel like it would have been easy if I didn't waste so much time on judges. Had to skim and rush the questions. Should have done that one first.Lxwind wrote:It was easy for me as well..took me about 6~7 minutes thoughcreed wrote:Is there consensus on Marx/Freud?
I thought it was extremely easy but I'm seeing otherwise on r/LSAT. I think I finished it in 4 minutes or so. Wondering if I overlooked some stuff. But I can see how Judges may have made it feel rough.
- Walliums

- Posts: 626
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I just need to have done better than June, but oh god that doesn't feel feasible right now. Fucking judges, man
- abujabal

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:32 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
What a roller coaster of a test.
Walked out of it feeling great after that cake LG and managing to make it through judges etc, but now y'all got me stressed. 3 LRs though, which of course is my worst possible experimental outcome.
I don't know that I'd want to do a retake, barring a disaster of a score - that was an obnoxious process. Not sure how confident I feel about the test anymore, but that thing just DRAINS the hell out of you
Walked out of it feeling great after that cake LG and managing to make it through judges etc, but now y'all got me stressed. 3 LRs though, which of course is my worst possible experimental outcome.
I don't know that I'd want to do a retake, barring a disaster of a score - that was an obnoxious process. Not sure how confident I feel about the test anymore, but that thing just DRAINS the hell out of you
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
person123456

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:27 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I had LG - LR - LG - RC - LR
Are we sure that the first LG was experimental?
I can't really remember the topics but I can remember some details of how the games were set up.
Are we sure that the first LG was experimental?
I can't really remember the topics but I can remember some details of how the games were set up.
- abujabal

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:32 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
We doing a title pun or nah?Barry grandpapy wrote:.
Don't mind the hackneyed "tagging" system
- Impressionist

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 10:24 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Well i guess this is good news overall. Means there is a chance the 2nd LR I did and which I felt was easiest might be real and the one I struggled most with (section 1) may be an experimental. Could be a huge point difference for me depending on the outcome.greenmusic97 wrote:My take: two test forms today with that order, one with exp 1 and the other with exp 3. Check topics here: forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic…
Guys... From Jon Denning (powerscore)
So if your order was LR, LG, LR, LR, RC, some people's LR exp was 1, some 3. This is a first and I'm so annoyed. I don't think we're ever gonna figure this out. I'm gonna be in pain until scores are released.
-
Barry grandpapy

- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Let's do it. 1st four suggestions get on the pollabujabal wrote:We doing a title pun or nah?Barry grandpapy wrote:.
Don't mind the hackneyed "tagging" system
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
greenmusic97

- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 8:41 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
The first q was flaw about drinking on campus. Can anyone confirm if it was real or not? Bc if so, i have figured out the exp.
- abujabal

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:32 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
"Divebombing the Judges Passage"Barry grandpapy wrote:Let's do it. 1st four suggestions get on the pollabujabal wrote:We doing a title pun or nah?Barry grandpapy wrote:.
Don't mind the hackneyed "tagging" system
or some variation thereof
- creed

- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:08 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Title idea: unified theory of gazpacho
- jjdude14

- Posts: 122
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2017 1:24 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I walked out of the testing center and my friend greeted me with a rum and coke. Haven't stopped since.dm1683 wrote:Sooooo....how did it go, and how drunk are you all getting tonight?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login